1 / 20

A mathematics support program for first year engineering students

A mathematics support program for first year engineering students . School of Mathematics and Physics The U niversity of Queensland 23 June 2014 . Email from student. I am taking MATH1051 this term ( Sem 1 2013). I attempted it last term ( Sem 2 2012), but dropped the course…

ansel
Télécharger la présentation

A mathematics support program for first year engineering students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A mathematics support program for first year engineering students School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland 23 June 2014

  2. Email from student I am taking MATH1051 this term (Sem 1 2013). I attempted it last term (Sem 2 2012), but dropped the course… I found the course material dense, and the lecture structure complex; learning bits and pieces from Algebra, and Calc throughout the week, rather than following a linear learning progression through the texts. I took MATH1050 Semester 1 2012, and achieved at 4.

  3. Sem 2 2013…. “ It took me 14 hours to do question one of the assignment - I stayed up all night. …. And spending 14h working through simple algebra seems a waste of time for assessment.”

  4. Target Group • Engineering students • Repeating the course • Low pass in Foundation Mathematics (FM)

  5. Quantitative Data MATH1051: Calculus & Linear Algebra, Sem. 2 2011 • Failure rate: 42% (251 out of 602 students) • 106 (42%) were students with FM1-4 (Foundation Maths grades 1-4, i.e. borderline pass or fail) • 82 (33%) were repeat students (RPT) Composition of Failures,

  6. Performance of FM1-4 students

  7. Performance of Repeat Students

  8. AIMS of SLT • Address poor background skills • Provide support in MATH1051 content • Provide support for examination preparation

  9. Pedagogy • Structured Lessons • Continual assessment • Drill & Practice • Depth rather than breadth • Doing by example • Concrete explanations • Spiral approach

  10. Background Skills • Online Diagnostic tests • Review Resources • Mathcentre: Algebra Refresher and Calculus Refresher Booklets • One-on-one consultation with students • Background skills addressed throughout the semester.

  11. 2. MATH1051 Content • SLT scheme of work closely aligned with the timing and delivery of course content. • Focus on Calculus • Extra time for (3-4 sessions) difficult topics e.g. Series and Power Series. • Additional worked examples to support lecture material. • Assistance with learning how to learn maths.

  12. 3. Exam Preparation • Early exposure to examination material • Worked examples mostly from past exams • Exam Preparation from Week 9 of term • Revision exercises, in incremental amounts from Weeks 9 onwards • Mock Exam during swotvac • Intensive revision classes during swotvac.

  13. Evaluation • Course results • Pass Rates • Quality of Passes • Performance in final examination • Student Evaluation

  14. Statistics Number in brackets are the percentages for the whole cohort

  15. Performance in Exam, 2012/2 Linear Algebra Calculus

  16. Performance in Exam, 2013/2 Linear Algebra Calculus

  17. What students liked • Extra resources e.g. revision material, worksheets. • Additional worked examples • Help with background skills • Classroom teaching • Being in a class with other students who have similar goals

  18. Areas for improvement • Too much time spent on background skills • Insufficient time • Cover linear algebra as well.

  19. Conclusion • Regularly supported students benefited from the SLT. • Extent of the contribution of SLT is difficult to determine. • SLT resources were well utilised by non-SLT students. • Response rate not great. Majority of high risk students are not coming forward for help.

  20. THE END

More Related