1 / 12

Non-Suicidal Self Injury and Social Media

Non-Suicidal Self Injury and Social Media. Kealagh Robinson & A/Prof Marc Wilson . Social Media Usage among Teenagers. 95% of all teenagers are online 81% use some kind of social media A third of teenagers exchange messages daily on social network sites. Function of the Internet.

april
Télécharger la présentation

Non-Suicidal Self Injury and Social Media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-Suicidal Self Injury and Social Media Kealagh Robinson & A/Prof Marc Wilson

  2. Social Media Usage among Teenagers • 95% of all teenagers are online • 81% use some kind of social media • A third of teenagers exchange messages daily on social network sites

  3. Function of the Internet Identity and Connection: Online communication creates place for personal bonding and anonymous disclosure. (Bargh, Mckenna & Fitzsimons, 2002) Teenagers who self-injure say that online they - Obtain support - Express themselves freely - Feel safe to do so due to anonymity and privacy. (Murray & Fox, 2006).

  4. Engaging Online: Photographic Sites (Baker & Lewis, 2013) • Positive Perspective: • Show bad it can get • Creates a place of support • Looking at the photos can reduce the impulse ..”Seeing these pictures gives me a release and sense of calm: it curbs my urges to cut. Also, knowing that I’m not alone in this is comforting…”

  5. Engaging Online: Photographic Sites (Baker & Lewis, 2013) • Negative Perspective: • Social irresponsible • Triggers viewers • Creates a competition • Normalises self injury • Glamorises self injury ..” It seems as though people are trying to make art out of it and deepening a connection with it.. . . Aren’t you concerned people will fall into the romance of it?

  6. Engaging Online: Videos (Lewis, Heath, Denis & Nobel,2011) Analyzed the most popular 50 character videos & 50 non-character videos. 80% accessible to general audiences. Explicit representation of self-injury - 90% of non-character videos had graphic photographs - 28% of character videos had in-action self-injury

  7. Reception of Videos (Lewis & Baker, 2011) Examined the comments on the 100 most popular self-injury videos. Global comments: 38% self-disclosed a personal history of self-injury 17% admired the message 15% admired the uploader 11% offered encouragement Recovery themed comments: Very few positive comments. 43% did not mention recovery and 34% indicated that they were still self-injuring.

  8. Informal and Professional Support Websites (Duggan, Heath, Lewis & Baxter 2012) • Professional Websites: • Don’t post graphic images • Separate NSSI and suicidality • Themes of recovery and support • Informal Websites: • Range of triggering content • Accessed more often • Often hosted by Facebook & other social media websites • Themes of hopelessness, desperation and encouragement

  9. Issue of Contagion • Individual differences in susceptibility • (Aral & Walker, 2012) Self reports of hearing about self injury (Hodgson, 2004) Some evidence in certain samples (Hodgson, 2004)

  10. Response of Social Media “prohibit [posts promoting self-harm], as a statement against the very ideas of self-harm that they are advancing” “Online dialogue about these acts and conditions is incredibly important; this prohibition is intended to reach only those blogs that cross the line into active promotion or glorification”

  11. Discussion….

More Related