1 / 10

Low latitude production and its high latitude nutrient sources

Low latitude production and its high latitude nutrient sources. (Interannual variability in SAMW nutrients). Jennifer Ayers 1,2 and Peter Strutton 1,2 1 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Sciences.

archie
Télécharger la présentation

Low latitude production and its high latitude nutrient sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low latitude production and its high latitude nutrient sources (Interannual variability in SAMW nutrients) Jennifer Ayers1,2 and Peter Strutton1,2 1Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania 2ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Sciences Liège, 17 May 2013

  2. Low latitude production: fueled by Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) nutrients • SAMWs primary source of nutrients to the global thermocline [Sarmiento et al., 2004] • 33-75% of tropical export production supported by SAMW nutrients [Palter et al. 2010] , SAMW Image: dimes.ucsd.edu • Research questions: • Variability in SAMW nutrients? • Forcing? • Implications for downstream productivity Fraction of thermocline nutrients from preformed SAMW pool Palter et al., Biogeosci. 2010

  3. Observed nutrient variability range/mean = % Pacific: 3.1/21.5 = 14% SR03+P11A: 2.6/16.1 = 16% range/mean = % Pacific: 4.4/8.7 = 50% SR03+P11A: 1.3/4.8 = 27% range/mean = % Pacific: 0.25/1.5 = 16% SR03+P11A: 0.27/1.1 = 25% range mean Pacific: 2.0°C 6.5°C SR03+P11A: 0.6°C 8.7°C Pacific sector Australian sector Indian sector

  4. SAM, MOC as drivers of variability Mean MOC ΔMOC, +SAM ΔNutrients, +SAM MLD Motivated by Sarmiento et al. (2004) and Lovenduskiand Gruber (2005) • Other potential drivers of variability not considered: • Variation in max winter mixed layer depth (vertical entrainment) • Upstream lateral induction

  5. Pacific sector SAMW nutrient response to MOC ΔSAMW nutrients (%) per 1 std. dev. change in -WSC ΔSAMW temp (°C) per 1 std. dev. change in -WSC 0.41 < R2 < 0.59 Increased upwelling Increased SAMW nuts (t=1yr) Increased upwelling Increased SAMW nuts (t<1yr) Increased downwelling Increased SAMW nuts (t<<1yr) * Correlations significant at p < 0.05. * indicates significance only at p < 0.10. * * Climatological Ekman transport time: 1.2 yrs • Support for: • Increase in SAMW nutrients with increase in Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) • Decreasing lag times with increasing proximity to formation region • Insufficient biological response to consume extra nutrients • Greater change in SAMW Si relative to N &P * Ayers and Strutton (2013, submitted)

  6. Australian sector SAMW nutrient response to ENSO El Niño  stronger EAC  decreased SAMW nutrients Lag time: 1 year 0.34 < R2 < 0.56 Correlations significant at p < 0.05. El Niño (+MEI Index) associated with decreased SAMW nutrients Ayers and Strutton (2013, submitted) Ridgway and Hill, 2009

  7. Why the greatest change in Si? Mean conditions • 1 stdevΔWSC: • ΔSi:15% • ΔN,P: 5% Biological Nutrient Uptake Fe-limited conditions: Si:N uptake is ~5:1* Fe-limitation eases a little … nutrient replete conditions (which they still aren’t) Si:N uptake ~1:1* Nutrient export in SAMWs High N, P, Low Si N, P + 5%, Si + 15% Nutrient Supply (Fe + macronutrients) When the MOC increases, nutrient supply increases Diatoms could decouple Si from N and P *Brzezinski, 1985 & 2003

  8. Impact on low latitude productivity Dunne et. al, 2007 Global Export Production ~10±3 PgC/yr Tropical Export Production is about 1/3 of that ~3.3±1 PgC/yr 1 stdev change in WSC Δ Tropical export fueled by SAMW nuts N,P: Δ(55 - 250) TgC/yr Si: Δ(165– 375) TgC/yr 33-75% of tropical export fueled by SAMW nuts [Palter et al., 2010] ~1.1-2.5 PgC/yr ΔSAMW nutrient concentrations: ~5-10% N,P ~15% Si ≈ Global C emissions [CDIAC] 2.58 PgC in 2011 > Equatorial Pacific export production (15°N-15°S) 1.09 PgC/yr ≈ 6-13% of mean tropical C export ≈ 1/2 China’s C emissions (1/2)x 677TgC in 2011 Dunne et. al, 2007

  9. In sum: 40-60% of Pacific Sector variability driven by strength of MOC Significant interannual variability in SAMW nutrients(16-50% of the mean) Australian Sector variability correlated with ENSO, attributed to its impact on East Australian Current Consequences for low-latitude productivity (1 std. dev. ΔWSC impacts annual tropical C export by 6-13%) Ayers and Strutton (2013, submitted)

  10. Thank You

More Related