1 / 42

Division I Advanced Progress Toward Degree

Division I Advanced Progress Toward Degree . Shauna Cobb Jennifer Smith. Overview. Progress-toward-degree principles. Recent legislation. Advanced concepts. Case studies. Best practices. PTD Principles. NCAA Division I Bylaw 14.4. Progress Toward Degree – Fundamental Principles.

arden
Télécharger la présentation

Division I Advanced Progress Toward Degree

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Division I Advanced Progress Toward Degree Shauna Cobb Jennifer Smith

  2. Overview • Progress-toward-degree principles. • Recent legislation. • Advanced concepts. • Case studies. • Best practices.

  3. PTD Principles NCAA Division I Bylaw 14.4

  4. Progress Toward Degree – Fundamental Principles • Appropriate minimal progress during traditional academic year. • Student-athletes (SA) must be “students.” • Progression toward a degree within five years of full-time enrollment. • Transfers should assimilate as quickly as possible.

  5. Full-Time Terms of Enrollment • All terms for which the SA initially enrolled full time must be counted in determining the percentage of degree and grade-point average requirements the SA must meet. • Terms for which a medical absence or international competition waiver was granted do not have to count. Bylaw 14.4.3.6 Staff interpretations [9/14/2005, 12/7/1990]

  6. Recent Legislation

  7. Cooperative Programs • SA may be eligible for competition while enrolled in a cooperative educational work experience program if: • The cooperative educational work experience is a required element of the SA’s degree program; and • SA is considered to be enrolled full time regardless of the credit value of the program. • SA does not have to meet the six-hour requirement. Bylaws 14.1.8.2.5 and 14.4.3.4.9

  8. Cooperative Programs • However; if the program is not required, the SA must be enrolled in a minimum of six credit hours, including the credit for the program. • Regardless, the SA must continue to meet all other progress-toward-degree requirements.

  9. Case Study • Ryan is enrolled in an business administration degree program with a required internship. • Ryan will intern for the 2011 spring term. • Ryan will be considered full time but will not receive credit for the internship. • Does Ryan need a waiver to be eligible to practice and compete?

  10. Case Study • Practice – if the institution considers Ryan full time, he does not need a waiver to practice. • Competition - if the internship meets Bylaw 14.1.8.2.5, Ryan does not need a waiver. • How does this impact Ryan’s eligibility to compete for the 2011 fall term?

  11. Case Study • Six hour rule – Ryan is exempt per the legislation. • Eighteen-hour rule – Ryan must meet this…plan accordingly. • Percentage - Ryan must meet this…plan accordingly. • GPA – Ryan must meet this.

  12. Case Study • What if the internship is NOT required, does Ryan need a waiver to compete? • No, if: • Institution considers Ryan full time; and • Ryan is enrolled in at least six hours. • When would a waiver be necessary? • Why distinguish between required and not required?

  13. Progress toward degree Advanced Concepts

  14. Progress Toward Degree Advanced Concepts • Double major/dual degree. • Advising to meet percentage of degree.

  15. Double Major/ Dual Degree Program • A double major within the same degree program may use credits toward either major to meet credit-hour requirements and/or the percentage-of-degree requirements. Bylaw 14.4.3 Staff Interpretation 02/03/1995

  16. Case Study • Lanie is in her third year of enrollment. • Designated a bachelor’s degree in sociology and psychology (one degree, two majors). • 135 credit hours needed to complete double major. • Lanie has completed 54 hours toward degree at the start of 2010-11.

  17. Case Study • Fall 2010 Lanie passed nine hours of sociology and six hours of electives that are not degree applicable. • Spring 2011 Lanie passed 12 hours of psychology.

  18. Case Study • Can Lanie satisfy credit-hour requirements (six and 18) to be eligible fall 2011? • Can Lanie satisfy percentage-of-degree requirements to be eligible fall 2011?

  19. Case Study-Credit Hours • May use credits earned toward either major to meet: • Credit-hour requirement. • Percentage of degree. • Must be pursuing one degree with two majors. • Spring 2011 – has six hours toward psychology. • 2010 -11: has 21 credits toward sociology/psychology (nine + 12).

  20. Case Study-Percentage • Must adjust denominator to determine number of hours needed to meet percentage. • 135 is the number of credit hours per institutional policy (denominator). • 60% of 135 = 81 credit hours.

  21. Case Study-Percentage • Lanie had 54 completed at the start of 2010-11; completed 21 that can be used. • 54 + 21 = 75. • Lanie will not be meeting percentage at the end of the spring 2011; will have to go to summer school.

  22. Double Major/ Dual Degree Program • SA enrolled in two separate degree programs must meet all credit-hour requirements in one of the two degree programs. Bylaw 14.4.3 04/22/1998 Staff Interpretation

  23. Case Study • Kaleb in his third year of enrollment and pursuing two degree programs (two separate degrees): • BS in Biology. • BS in Business Administration. • 150 credit hours needed to complete the two degrees (assuming double counting as appropriate). • 120 credit hours to complete any one degree.

  24. Case Study • Kaleb has completed 48 credit hours toward business and 36 toward biology if the two programs were considered separately. • Fall 2010 Kaleb passed nine hours of biology and six hours of business courses. • Spring 2011 Kaleb passed 12 hours of business courses.

  25. Case Study • Can Kaleb satisfy credit-hour requirements (six and 18) to be eligible fall 2011? • Can Kaleb satisfy percentage-of-degree requirements to be eligible fall 2011?

  26. Case Study-Credit Hours • Must satisfy all progress-toward-degree requirements in one of the two programs: • May not combine credits to meet progress-toward-degree requirements. • For progress-toward-degree purposes, institution is noting business as primary degree. • Spring 2011 – has six hours toward business. • 2010 -11 – has  18 credits toward business (six + 12).

  27. Case Study-Percentage • Use the number of hours required for the primary degree for the denominator used to calculate percentage of degree. • 120 is the number of credit hours required for the business degree. • 60% of 120 = 72 credit hours in business.

  28. Case Study-Percentage • Kaleb had 48 toward business completed at the start of 2010-11; completed 18 that can be used toward business. • 48 + 18 = 66. • Kaleb will not be meeting percentage in business at the end of the spring 2011; will have to go to summer school.

  29. Advising to Percentage of Degree • SA entering third year of enrollment shall have completed successfully at least 40% of the course requirements in the student's degree program. • SA entering fourth year of enrollment shall have completed successfully at least 60% of the course requirements in the student's degree program. • SA entering fifth year of enrollment shall have completed successfully at least 80% of the course requirements in the student's degree program.  • Bylaw 14.4.3.2

  30. Advising to Percentage of Degree Question: • What is included in the denominator for calculating percentage of degree? Answer: • All courses that fulfill a requirement in that SA's specific degree program. • General education requirements. • Major courses. • Electives (major or free). • Required minor (if included in the total number of credit hours required for the degree).

  31. Advising to Percentage of Degree Questions: • If the progress toward degree calculation results a fraction (e.g., 39.9%), can that be rounded up? • Can the number of credit hours required to meet percentage of degree be rounded (e.g., 40% of 128 = 51.2; can the requirement be met with 51 credit hours)? Answer: • No rounding to meet the requirement. • SA entering third year of enrollment has designated a degree that requires 128 credit hours. • SA has completed 51 credit hours. • 51/128 = 39.8% of degree completed. SA is deficient meeting 40%. • 40% of 128 credit hours is 51.2 credit hours. Unless there is a way for the SA to obtain 2 credit hours, he or she will need 52 credit hours to meet the requirement.

  32. Best Practices Certification of Eligibility and Progress-toward-degree Waivers

  33. Best Practices – Certifying Eligibility • Required to determine eligibility for practice and competition. • Develop procedures for documenting academic eligibility for competition. • Develop procedures for documenting academic eligibility for NCAA Division I Academic Progress Rate. • Earning of “Eligibility” point.

  34. AMA Online • Online waiver portal to file all AMA waivers. • Launched February 2011. • ALL waivers must be filed via online portal, including documentation. • Waivers will not be accepted via the portal until all required documentation is submitted.

  35. AMA Online

  36. AMA Online

  37. Best Practices – PTD Waivers • Complete all required questions within the waiver application. • Input a complete grid. • Number of hours that are degree applicable each term. • Whether the SA competed each term. • Official transcripts are required (copies are OK). • Grades for most recent term completed must be included.

  38. Best Practices – Progress-Toward-Degree Waivers • Include an academic recovery plan that the SA can successfully follow, with references to academic support and any accommodations. • Include an institutional recovery plan in case of misadvisement. • Include documentation to support mitigation (e.g., education-impacting disability documentation). • Submit requests in a timely manner once it is determined a waiver is necessary.

  39. Best Practices – Urgent Cases • Follow directions above. • Clearly indicate when the waiver is needed (next date of competition). • Staff will prioritize the review of waivers based on: • Date of the next contest. • Order in which the case was received. • Date the institution determined a waiver was necessary. • Staff generally needs at least one day to complete a thorough review of the information presented.

  40. Progress-Toward-Degree Waivers – Staff Analysis • How close is the SA to meeting the requirement for which the waiver is requested? • Is the SA still in a position to graduate within five years? • Quality point analysis. • Academic recovery plan. • Appropriate academic support/accommodations. • What has changed for the SA? • Does the SA have a strong overall academic record?

  41. PTD Waivers – Staff Analysis • What documented mitigating circumstances affected the SA’s academic performance. • Has the SA previously received a progress-toward-degree waiver?

  42. Questions? Thank you for attending!

More Related