1 / 11

A5-M1 Link Road (DNB) The Highways Agency has published these two route options for consultation:

A5-M1 Link Road (DNB) The Highways Agency has published these two route options for consultation:. Manouchehr Nahvi. The Two Bypass Options. Southern Route : Safeguarded Route in South Beds Local Plan Northern Route:

arvid
Télécharger la présentation

A5-M1 Link Road (DNB) The Highways Agency has published these two route options for consultation:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A5-M1 Link Road (DNB)The Highways Agency has published these two route options for consultation: Manouchehr Nahvi

  2. The Two Bypass Options • Southern Route: • Safeguarded Route in South Beds Local Plan • Northern Route: • An alignment further north designed to create more potential for development

  3. Development issues • The GVA Grimley study commissioned by the HA to assist evaluation of the effect of potential development of the Bypass proposal, considered 3 development options for 2 different bypass alignments

  4. The Three development Options • Development south of the Southern Route • Development both sides of the Southern Route • Development south of the Northern Route

  5. The GVA Grimley Study estimated the following scale of housing that might be accommodated: • Development both sides of the Southern Route • Up to 17000 units • Development south of the Northern Route • Up to 16000 units • Development south of the Southern Route • Up to 11000 units

  6. The SBDC perspective:Key Issues • The primary purpose of the route should be strategic, and with the aim of maximising traffic relief for Dunstable • Need to ensure that the Bypass design can fully accommodate both strategic A5/M1 traffic and: • connections to the proposed Luton Bypass and the A505; • access to proposed new development area • a new link road to connect to the central Dunstable and Houghton Regis employment area; • The Northern Route could provide more flexibility in respect of the above points • SBDC to continue ‘In principle’ support for the scheme

  7. Environmental implications • Both bypass routes are predicted to: • reduce HGV traffic through Dunstable • slightly reduce traffic congestion in central Dunstable • help improve air quality in the urban area • However, they also have: • some adverse ecological and landscape impact • potentially significant archaeological impact • significant impact on the rights of way network

  8. Land use • Land take is similar for both options, with nearly 40% associated with the proposed junction with the M1 . • Both routes require the same number of properties to be demolished at the eastern end of the Bypass • The Southern Route will have further impact, taking approximately 38% of the Rugby Football Club.

  9. Visual and landscape impact • The most significant visual and landform effect will be from junction 11A • Northern Route will have greater landscape impact than Southern Route

  10. Indicative Scheme Programme • Public Consultation • Sept to Dec. 2005 • Preferred Route announcement • Late Spring 2005 • Draft Order publication: 2007 • Public Inquiry: 2008 • Start of Works: 2009 • Open to traffic: 2010/11

  11. Conclusion • It is recommended that the Council responds to the HA consultation in the terms listed under paragraph 2.0 of the report.

More Related