1 / 25

What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada

What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department of Education. 2012 Status Check. SFSF Requirements. Report on Teacher and Principal Evaluations Match Teachers to Students

asabi
Télécharger la présentation

What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department of Education

  2. 2012 Status Check

  3. SFSF Requirements • Report on Teacher and Principal Evaluations • Match Teachers to Students • Student-level Transcript Information • Students Enrolling in Postsecondary • Students Earning Credits in Postsecondary

  4. SFSF Requirements • Report on Teacher and Principal Evaluations • Match Teachers to Students • Student-level Transcript Information • Students Enrolling in Postsecondary • Students Earning Credits in Postsecondary

  5. Legislation HB 96ER Delays the Accreditation benchmarks slated for 2012-2013 to 2013-14 (passed House and Senate)

  6. Legislation HB 367 Requires DOE to publish disciplinary offense and outcome data disaggregated by race/ethnicity and gender (passed House and Senate) SB514/HB642 Requires the Board of Education to add three points to the Graduation and Completion Index for every student who earns a diploma and a Board-approved industry certification, pathway certification, state licensure, or an occupational competency credential (signed by Governor)

  7. Legislation HB 1189 School boards may develop a standard form to obtain parental consent for the release of data. The form shall be used by Community Policy and Management Teams, and the Departments of Health, Social Services, Correctional Education, Juvenile Justice, and Behavioral Health and Developmental Services (passed House and Senate)

  8. Legislation SB 489/HB 1061 Beginning with the 9th grade class of 2013-2014, students must earn a career and technical education credential to earn a standard diploma. Standard or advanced diplomas require successful completion of one virtual course. The modified standard diploma is eliminated and the GAD program is folded into the Adult High School Diploma and requires a career and technical credential. ISAEP would require the student to earn a career and technical education credential and to pass a course in economics and finance. (passed House and Senate)

  9. Legislation HB 424 Changes the Code regarding providing a minor’s school records from a custody proceeding to any proceeding (passed House and Senate) HB1215 Directs the Board of Education to develop standards for accrediting virtual schools (signed by the Governor)

  10. Workplace Readiness NOCTI Assessments Your CTE data here Industry Certifications State Licensures

  11. CTE Credentials • Annual increases in the percent of students earning credentials are worth a bonus point in the VIP calculation • Will help increase the Graduation and Completion Index (HB642/SB514) • Will be required to earn a standard diploma, GAD, or ISAEP (HB 1061/SB 489) • Will be added to the school report cards • Part of the proposed ESEA Waiver (more on this later) to determine if a school meets performance expectations.

  12. Virginia’s ESEA Waiver • Approved by the Board on February 23 • Submitted to USED on February 28 • Is NOT yet approved • We don’t know when it will be approved • There may be negotiated changes http://www.doe.virginia.gov/federal_programs/esea/va_esea_flexibility_application_2-28-12.pdf

  13. AYP Here Lies AYP 2003 - 2011 Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  14. Proposed School Designations • Reward Schools • Virginia Index of Performance • Title I Distinguished schools • Priority Schools • Focus Schools • No more “Made/Did Not Make AYP” Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  15. Performance and Participation Expectations • Meet SOA minimums in English, math, science, and history for all students, including the Graduation and Completion Index (in other words, Accreditation as we know it today) • Test participation rate >= 95% for reading and math • Public reporting of proficiency gaps for proficiency gap groups Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  16. Gap Groups Gap Group 1: Students with disabilities, English Language Learners, and economically disadvantaged students (unduplicated). Gap Group 2: Black students, not of Hispanic origin, not already in Gap Group 1 Gap Group 3: Hispanic students, of one or more races, not already included in Gap Group 1 DOE will continue to disaggregate by the traditional subgroups for public reporting. Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  17. Proficiency Gap Group Expectations for Elementary and Middle Schools Each Gap Group must: • Meet the 95% participation rate in reading and math; AND • Meet SOA Targets in reading and math; OR • A majority of the students who failed reading and math must show moderate growth; OR • Reduce the failure rate by 10 percent SGP’s 1 to 34 Low 35 to 65 Moderate 66 to 99 High Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  18. Proficiency Gap Group Expectations for High Schools* Each Gap Group must: • Meet the 95% participation rate in reading and math; AND • Meet SOA Targets in reading and math; OR • Meet a state goal of 48% of graduates earning a college-or-career-ready credential (CCRC); OR • Increase the percent of graduates earning a CCRC by 10 percent * Schools with a graduating class Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  19. Division Accountability • The same participation and performance expectations as schools • Meet Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for limited English proficient student performance Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  20. Priority Schools • At least 5 percent of Virginia’s Title I schools (about 36 schools) • A Tier I or II SIG School • A Title I School that is: • A high school with an FGI of 60% or lower for the past two years • Accreditation denied, or Conditionally-Reconstituted due to English or math performance • Accredited with warning for English or math performance Schools will be rank ordered based on the sum of the differences between reading and math performance and the SOA targets. Schools with the largest gaps will be included, up to 36 schools. Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  21. Before we talk about Focus Schools • We need to learn about “Proficiency Gap Points” • Calculate the difference between each Gap Group’s performance in Reading and/or Math and the SOA target for the subject • Exclude groups that meet or exceed the target • Sum the differences and divide by the number of gap groups • You now have the school’s Average Proficiency Gap Points! Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  22. Proficiency Gap Calculation NI – the group is not included because it met or exceeded the SOA target

  23. Focus Schools • At least 10 percent of Virginia’s Title I schools (about 72 schools) • Not a Priority School • One or more Gap Groups have missed the SOA proficiency target in reading and/or math • The 72 schools with the highest proficiency gap points are Focus Schools Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  24. What have we learned? • Three Proficiency Gap Groups • A hybrid of Accreditation and AYP • Accreditation calculations do not change • Incorporates Student Growth in Elementary and Middle • Includes College and Career Ready measures for High Schools • Reward, Priority, and Focus school designations Based on DOE’s unapproved flexibility request

  25. Questions?

More Related