1 / 22

EGEP European GNSS Evolution Programme

EGEP European GNSS Evolution Programme. J.B. Zieliński Zespół Ekspertów KBKiS PAN Posiedzenia – 21.11.2012. Galileo governance structure. EC. Money Policy Ownership. Framework agreement. EP resolution. ESA. GSA. Operation FP7 PRS, Commercial. Product System development.

azize
Télécharger la présentation

EGEP European GNSS Evolution Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EGEPEuropean GNSS Evolution Programme J.B. Zieliński Zespół Ekspertów KBKiS PAN Posiedzenia– 21.11.2012

  2. Galileo governancestructure EC Money Policy Ownership Framework agreement EP resolution ESA GSA Operation FP7 PRS, Commercial Product System development

  3. Programy ESA Mandatory – finansowane ze składek Optional – finansowane przez zainteresowane kraje Contracted – zlecane przez inne organizacje - przykład: budowa systemu Galileo na zlecenie Komisji Europejskiej

  4. EGEP Original Programme Objectives ESA Optional Programme initiated 2007 funded by 18 ESA MS (except one) and Canada. Programme objectives: Enable technical readiness for upgrades and evolution of EGNOS and Galileo caused by mission evolution, operability improvements and/or technology obsolescence Maintain technical European know how, competences and infrastructures at par internationally Sustain competitiveness and innovation capabilities Financial envelope 2007-12 109 M€ c.e.c. The activities were focusing on infrastructure technology R&D, and system development activities covering Phase A/B

  5. Optionalprogramme EGEP 2007-2012Total cost 105 M € • Austria 2 623 • Czech Rep 480 • Denmark 2 800 • Belgium 4 120 • Finland 613 • France 22 862 • Germany 16 378 • Greece 653 • Ireland 630 • Italy 15 037 • Luxemburg 0 • Netherlands 1 763 • Norway 4 858 • Portugal 1 940 • Spain 9 750 • Sweden 2 050 • Swiss 5 820 • UK 5 852 • Canada 1 601 in k €

  6. OverviewGalileo System Evolution Directions Horizontal 1. *** Cost Efficiency / Cost benefit of Galileo System Space Segment • *** Increase platform & launcher flexibility • *** Guarantee the availability of diversified and independent European GNSS technologies • * Optimize Satellite Constellation with Alternative Orbits Ground System • *** Increase Ground Segment (GS) Robustness Frequencies, Signals and Services • *** Increase Robustness and/or Compatibility of Galileo Public Regulated Service (PRS) • ** Mitigate Vulnerability of Galileo (and GNSS) Signals to Interference • ** Increase Competitive Service Performance in Comparison to other GNSS • ** Increase Operational Capabilities of PRS • * Increase Utilization of Galileo with Respect to Integrity Applications • ** Improve Protection of Ground-to-Space Links for all Phases of Operations *** High Priority ** Medium Priority * Low Priority

  7. Someexamples of theresultsof EGEP Phase 1 • EGNOS v. 3 • New RIMS equipment design • New PassiveHydrogen Maser design • Cs spaceclock development • Ground Cs clock development • SPEED platform • Receiverdevelopments • Ionosphere Monitoring Facility • Test-Bed activity Total 61 tasks

  8. Zadanie polskiej strony • Nakreślić zakres tematyczny • Zaproponować wymiar (envelope) wkładu finansowego • Podpisanie „Declaration on EGEP” • Udział polskich jednostek w konkursach

  9. Propozycje do współpracy z EGEP • EGNOS v.3 • System study • Ionosphere • Non-aviation EGNOS applications •  Galileo 2G • ISL study • PRS • Time scale and synchronization • Alternativeorbits • Test beds • Interferences • Sevice performance • Integrity • Other • Laser ranging

  10. Baza danych o firmach zainteresowanych GNSS • Alcatel Polska S.A. • Andra Sp. z o. o. • Astri Polska • AutoGuard Insurance Sp. z o. o. • BUMAR • BUMAR – RADWAR • Center of Management – Active Geodetic Network “ASG – PL” • Czerski Trade Polska Sp. z o. o. • Economics and Spatial Information • ECORYS Polska • Elproma Elektronika Sp. z o. o. • Geodeta Sp. z o. o. • Geofizyka Toruń Sp. z o. o. • Geosystems Polska Sp. z o.o. • Geotronics Kraków Sp. z o.o. • Hertz-Systems • Infotron Sp. z o. o. • Intertop Sp. z o. o. • KPG Sp. z o. o. • Macropol Sp. z o. o. • Noma 2 Sp. z o. o. • Polkomtel S.A. • Polish Aeroclub • "Polish Airports" State Enterprise • Polish Air Navigation Services Agency • PikTime • Polish State Railways • Polspace Sp. z o. o. • PZL Świdnik • Railway Scientific and Technical Centre • WB Electronics

  11. Instytucje naukowe • Instytut Łączności – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy • Politechnika Warszawska, • Centrum Badań Kosmicznych • UniwersytetWarmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, • Akademia Marynarki Wojennej im. Bohaterów Westerplatte, • Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Sił Powietrznych • Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna • Politechnika Gdańska • Wojskowy Instytut Łączności • Instytut Geodezji i Kartografii • I inne

  12. ISTOTNE PYTANIE • Czy działamy w rozproszeniu czy w sposób zorganizowany ?

  13. Dziękuję za uwagę

More Related