1 / 27

European GNSS Programmes EGNOS and Galileo

European GNSS Programmes EGNOS and Galileo. Paul Verhoef Programme Manager EU satellite navigation programmes European Commission. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Presentation content. EGNOS 2. Galileo 3. EU-USA. Presentation content. EGNOS 2. Galileo 3. EU-USA. EGNOS: GPS augmentation service.

Télécharger la présentation

European GNSS Programmes EGNOS and Galileo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. European GNSS ProgrammesEGNOS and Galileo Paul Verhoef Programme Manager EU satellite navigation programmes European Commission EUROPEANCOMMISSION

  2. Presentation content EGNOS2. Galileo3. EU-USA

  3. Presentation content EGNOS2. Galileo3. EU-USA

  4. EGNOS: GPS augmentation service EGNOSService Area EGNOS Satellite Footprints INMARSAT AOR-E (15.5°W), ARTEMIS (21.3°E), INMARSAT IOR-W (25°E)

  5. 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 EGNOS TimelineRegional Infrastructure & Services EGNOS Programme Phases Operational Phase (Long Term Operations, Extensions, Replenishments) Deployment Phase Definition Phase IOP … Initial Operations

  6. EGNOS Performance (January 2009) Source: Service Management Report ESSP for January 2009 The deployment of additional RIMS in Northern Europe, Southern Europe, and Northern Africa will increase the coverage area of APV-1 Availability. APV … Approach with vertical guidance

  7. Accumulative Signal in Space (SIS) Availability 100,00% 90,00% 80,00% 70,00% 60,00% % SIS of last 28 days 50,00% 40,00% 30,00% 20,00% 10,00% 0,00% 24/07/2007 14/08/2007 08/01/2008 05/08/2008 04/09/2007 06/11/2007 19/02/2008 15/07/2008 26/08/2008 03/07/2007 25/09/2007 16/10/2007 27/11/2007 18/12/2007 29/01/2008 11/03/2008 03/06/2008 24/06/2008 13/05/2008 22/05/2007 12/06/2007 01/04/2008 22/04/2008 20/03/2007 10/04/2007 01/05/2007 Date EGNOS Performance (March 2007 – August 2008) EGNOS is already broadcasting signals of excellent quality.Signal in Space availability has been continuous since January 2008*. * with exception of 28 December 2008

  8. EGNOS Programme Status • EGNOS is already broadcasting signals of excellent quality • 2009: • Assets have been transferred from ESA to the European Community in April 2009 • First EGNOS operator contract as of 1st April 2009 • New OS ICD release planned for autumn 2009 • Lease completed of an EGNOS transponder to replace ARTEMIS as of 2011 • Procurement action ongoing for replacement of a 2nd EGNOS transponder • Geographical service extension is under study • 2010: • SOL declaration of "entry into service" planned for mid-2010 (after certification milestone)

  9. EGNOS potential extensions Eastern Europe Middle-East MEDA Depending on the extension area, technical implementation may vary from: • Homogeneous extension with deployment of additional RIMS • Regional infrastructure including additional processing capabilities

  10. EGNOS Service Evolutions • Service Provision Improvements►short/medium term • Coverage Evolution • Eastern Europe, MEDA, Middle East/ACAC ►medium term • Africa ►medium/long term • Frequency Evolution • Extension to the E5a/E5b frequency decided on ARTEMIS replacement • Evolution of Standards ►long term • Standardisation of E5a and E5b, L1 CBOC on-going • Augmentation of new GNSS • Additional Services • LPV200 service level ►medium term (2011) EGNOS capability to meet this service level currently under technical evaluation • EGNOS time service ►medium term • Possible critical communication message

  11. EGNOS Value Added Size of circles indicates importance of each attribute of EGNOS to the market,(large = very important) The extent to which EGNOS meets these attributes is identified by the colour: green … meets requirements red … does not meet Integrity may be useful to Road applications, primarily RUC, but there little awareness of the value or potential role or need for it. Precision agriculture in OS includes crop spraying, yield management and field / plot measurement EGNOS Value Added (versus GPS) EGNOS EGNOS Performance & Value Add appls Accuracy Integrity Availability Continuity Markets E112 n/a LBS Non Reg LBS n/a eCall n/a n/a Truck Telematics Road n/a n/a Pay as you drive n/a n/a Dangerous Freight goods - multimodality perishables HGV - Livestock - Specialist tracking City Logistics APV Aviation A-SMGCS (Aircraft Gnd n/a n/a Vehicles) Shunting n/a n/a Rail Other High Precision n/a professional Precision n/a agriculture (OS) Farming Precision n/a agriculture (HPP) Traffic Inland management & n/a waterways surveillance

  12. Presentation content EGNOS2. Galileo3. EU-USA

  13. 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Galileo TimelineGlobal Infrastructure & Services Exploitation Phase Galileo Programme Phases Deployment Phase Development / IOV Phase Definition Phase

  14. Galileo Implementation Plan Full Operational Capability 27 (+3) Galileo satellites 2013 In-Orbit Validation 4 IOV satellites plusground segment 2010 Galileo System Testbed v2 2 initial test satellites 2005 Galileo System Testbed v1 Validation of critical algorithms 2003

  15. Galileo Test Satellites • Giove-A launched on 28 December 2005 • Secured Galileo frequencies • Giove-B launched on 27 April 2008 • First Passive Hydrogen Maseratomic clock ever flown • Implementation of CBOC signal • Working as expected 15 |

  16. Galileo IOV vs FOC IOV (In Orbit Validation), FOC (Full Operational Capability)

  17. IOV Ground Segment Sites Svalbard ULS/GSS Alaska GSS Kiruna TTC Redu GSS Urumchi GSS Fucino GSS Washington GSS S. Korea GSS Riyadh GSS Hawaii GSS Kourou TTC/ULS/GSS New Caledonia ULS/GSS Reunion ULS/GSS Papeete ULS/GSS Easter Island GSS Perth GSS Cordoba GSS South Africa GSS Sensor Stations Up-Link stations TT&C stations Control Centres Troll GSS

  18. Galileo FOC Procurement • Contract notice: 1 July 2008 • Infrastructure procurement in 6 work packages • Operational Capability in 2013

  19. Galileo ProcurementRetained Candidates

  20. Updated Governance

  21. Presentation content EGNOS2. Galileo3. EU-USA

  22. EU-USA • Common approach with regard to an overall GNSS strategy • Solving the compatibility issues and enhancing interoperability • Developing a common GNSS standard for Safety of Life • Coordinating inputs to UN ICG/Providers’ Forum

  23. EU-USA • Galileo and GPS are compatible and interoperable • Thanks to detailed and lengthy bilateral discussions through Working Groups, established by the EU US 2004 Agreement and following close monitoring by the senior levels chaired by US DoS and EC • Excellent results to-date • MBOC common modulation • National Security Compatibility Compliance • GGTO implemented on IOV and tested on GIOVE • But, many more joint efforts are needed to ensure C&I for all GNSS

  24. GNSS Compatibility & Interoperability E5 L1 E5a E5b E6 L1 L5 L3 L5 L1 LEX (E6) E6 E5b L1 COMPASS IRNSS

  25. EU-USA • Other issues • Trade working-group • Further definition of « non-discriminatory approach to trade in GNSS goods and services (WTO) • Discussion on IPR aspects of Galileo R&D • Galileo spectrum in U.S. National Table of Frequency Allocations • Joint outreach (GPS-Galileo fact sheet etc) • Procurement of GPS and Galileo • Security • Sofar: Export controls, technology control • Next: Endorsement of new legal basis for exchange of classified information • Protection/hosting of ground stations • Security roles and responsibilities

  26. EU-USA • Safety of Life Service: common GNSS standard • 1st generation SBAS (WAAS EGNOS MSAS GAGAN) has reached a good level of maturity, but are based on GPS only • Galileo has designed a SoL standard • Integrity concepts likely to evolve with increasing number of constellations • Other constellations are interested in developing built-in integrity • Users need a single interface, single standard • Need common vision for the future

  27. Thank you for your attention.  SOURCE

More Related