1 / 39

Precision Measurement of the e + e   +   () Cross Section with the ISR Method

Precision Measurement of the e + e   +   () Cross Section with the ISR Method. Michel Davier ( LAL – Orsay) (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration). physics goals analysis steps e + e   +   () e + e  p + p  () discussion.

biana
Télécharger la présentation

Precision Measurement of the e + e   +   () Cross Section with the ISR Method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Precision Measurement of the e+e+() Cross Section with the ISR Method Michel Davier (LAL – Orsay) (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration) • physics goals • analysis steps • e+e+() • e+ep+p() • discussion Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  2. Hadronic Vacuum Polarization and Muon (g–2) Contributions to the Standard Model (SM) Prediction: Dominant uncertainty from lowest order hadronic piece. Cannot be calculated from QCD (“first principles”) – but:we can use experiment Im[ ]  | hadrons |2 had  ”Dispersion relation“  had   ... Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  3. Goals of the Analysis • Measure R=   pt (also RKK) with high accuracy for vacuum polarization calculations, using the ISR method •  channel contributes 73% of ahad • Dominant uncertainty also from  • Also important to increase precision on (MZ2) (EW tests, ILC) • Present systematic precision of ee experiments CMD-2 0.8% SND 1.5% in agreement KLOE (ISR from 1.02 GeV) 1.3% some deviation in shape • Big advantage of ISR: all mass spectrum covered at once, from threshold to 4-5 GeV, with same detector and analysis • Interesting to compare to spectral functions from  decays discrepancy /e+e evaluations (3.0  1.1)%  aim for a measurement with <1% accuracy Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  4. Situation at ICHEP-Tau06 Hadronic HO – ( 9.8 ± 0.1) 10–10 Hadronic LBL + (12.0 ± 3.5) 10–10 Electroweak (15.4 ± 0.2) 10–10 QED (11 658 471.9 ± 0.1) 10–10 inclu-ding: .0 Knecht-Nyffeler,Phys.Rev.Lett. 88 (2002) 071802 Melnikov-Vainshtein, hep-ph/0312226 Davier-Marciano, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sc. (2004) Kinoshita-Nio (2006) BNL E821 (2004): aexp = (11 659 208.0  6.3) 1010 Observed Difference with BNL using e+e: Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  5. The Relevant Processes ISR FSR ISR + add. ISR ISR + add. FSR Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  6. The Measurement • ISR photon at large angle in EMC • 1 (for efficiency) or 2 (for physics) tracks of good quality • identification of the charged particles • separate pp/KK/mm event samples • kinematic fit (not using ISR photon energy) including 1 additional photon • obtain all efficiencies (trigger, filter, tracking, ID, fit) from same data • measure ratio of ppg(g) to mmg(g) cross sections to cancel ee luminosity additional ISR vacuum polarization ISR photon efficiency • still need to correct for |FSR|2 contribution in mmg(g) and additional FSR, both calculated in QED, but also checked in data (ISR-FSR interference, additional detected photons) otherwise 3-4% syst error Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  7. PEP-II is an asymmetric e+ecollider operating at CM energy of (4S). Integrated luminosity = 531 fb-1 BaBar / PEP II BaBar EMC: • 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals, resolution ~1-2 % high E. BaBar IFR: • resistive plate chambers • BaBar DIRC • particle ID up to 4-5 GeV/c • BaBar SVT and DCH • precision tracking Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  8. Analysis Steps 230.8 fb-1 (U(4S) on-peak & off peak) • Geometrical acceptance • Triggers (L1 hardware, L3 software), background-filter efficiencies • Tracking efficiency • Particle ID matrix (ID and mis-ID efficiencies)   K • Kinematic fitting reduce non 2-body backgrounds 2 cut efficiency additional radiation (ISR and FSR) secondary interactions • Unfolding of mass spectra • Consistency checks for  (QED test, ISR luminosity) and  • Unblinding R • Results on  cross section and calculation of dispersion integral Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  9. MC Generators • Acceptance and efficiencies determined initially from simulation, with data/MC corrections applied • Large simulated samples, typically 10  data, using AfkQed generator • AfkQed: lowest-order QED with additional radiation: ISR with structure function method,  assumed collinear to the beams and with limited energy FSR using PHOTOS • Phokhara 4.0: exact second-order QED matrix element, no more radiation • Studies comparing Phokhara and AfkQed at 4-vector level with fast simulation Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  10. Particle-related Efficiency Measurements tag particle (track, ID) γISR candidate (p, , φ) • benefit from pair production for particle ID • kinematically constrained events • efficiency automatically averaged over running periods • measurement in the same environment as for physics, in fact same events! • applied to particle ID with p/K/m samples, tracking, study of secondary interactions… • assumes that efficiencies of the 2 particles are uncorrelated • in practice not true  this is where 95% of the work goes! • study of 2-particle overlap in the detector (trigger,tracking, EMC, IFR) required • a large effort to reach per mil accuracies (hence the duration of the analysis) Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  11. Data/MC Tracking Correction to ppg,mmg cross sections • single track efficiency • correlated loss probability f0 • probability to produce more than 2 tracks f3 and similarly for pp mmm mpp Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  12. Particle Identification * isolated muons Mmm > 2.5 GeV  efficiency maps (p,v1,v2) impurity (1.10.1) 10-3 * correlated efficiencies/close tracks  maps (dv1,dv2) • Particle identification required to separate XX final processes • Define 5 ID classes using cuts and PID selectors (complete and orthogonal set) • Electrons rejected at track definition level (Ecal, dE/dx) • All ID efficiencies measured xI Barrel ZIFR fIFR XIFR • a tighter  ID (h) is used for tagging in efficiency measurements and to further reject background in low cross section regions. YIFR Forward Endcap Backward Endcap Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  13. Data/MC PID corrections to mm and pp cross sections mmg Two running periods with different IFR performance ppg Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  14. PID separation and Global Test All ‘xx’  solve for all xx(0) and compare with no-ID spectrum and estimated syst. error • N(o)ii hist: predicted from PID dots: measured (no ID) mpp(GeV) Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  15. Kinematic Fitting • kinematic fits to X X ISR add • ISR photon defined as highest energy • Add. ISR fit: add assumed along beams • Add. ‘FSR’ if add detected • Each event recorded on 2D plot • Typical regions defined • Loose 2 cut (outside BG region in plot) for  and  in central  region • Tight 2 cut (ln(2+1)<3) for  in  tail region ppg(g) Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  16. Backgrounds • background larger with loose 2 cut used in 0.5-1.0 GeV mass range • q q and multi-hadronic ISR background from MC samples + normalization from data using signals from 0ISR (qq), and  and  (0) • global test in background-rich region near cut boundary BG fractions in 10-3 at mpp values Fitted BG/predicted = 0.9680.037 pp multi-hadrons mpp (GeV) Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  17. Additional ISR mmgg Angular distribution of add. ISR /beams! Energy cut-off for add. ISR in AfkQed ppgg Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  18. Additional FSR Angle between add  and closest track FSR mmgg ISR Large-angle add.ISR in data  AfkQed ppgg Evidence for FSR data  AfkQed Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  19. 2 cut Efficiency Correction loose c2 • depends on simulation of ISR (FSR), resolution effects (mostly ISR  direction) for mm and pp • c2 cut efficiency can be well measured in mm data because of low background • main correction from lack of angular distribution for additional ISR in AfkQed • common correction: 1% for loose c2, 7% for tight c2 • additional loss for pp because of interactions studied with sample of interacting events agreement data/MC mmgg 1.00  0.16 loose c2 1.07  0.11 tight c2 syst error 0.5-1.5 10-3 Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  20. Checking Known Distributions Cosq* in XX CM /g mm flat at threshold 1+cos2q* bm1 pp sin2q*   P>1 GeV track requirement  loss at cos*1 Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  21. QED Test with mmg sample • absolute comparison of mm mass spectra in data and in simulation • simulation corrected for data/MC efficiencies • AfkQed corrected for incorrect NLO using Phokhara • results for different running periods consistent: (7.9 7.5) 10-3 • full statistics J/y excluded (0.2 – 5.0 GeV) BaBar ee luminosity ISR  efficiency 5.2 syst. trig/track/PID 4.0 Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  22. Unfolding Mass Spectrum • measured mass spectrum distorted by resolution effects and FSR (mpp vs. s’) • unfolding uses mass-transfer matrix from simulation • 2 MeV bins in 0.5-1.0 GeV mass range, 10 MeV bins outside • most salient effect in - interference region (little effect on ampp) Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  23. Systematic Uncertainties • mm ISR lumi • fitted w.r.t. • LO formula pp increased to 20. for preliminary results, pending investigations Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  24. BaBar results Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  25. BaBar results in  region Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  26. BaBar vs. other experiments at large mass Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  27. BaBar vs.other ee data (0.5-1.0 GeV) direct relative comparison of cross sections in the corresponding 2-MeV BaBar bins (interpolation with 2 bins) deviation from 1 of ratio w.r.t. BaBar stat + syst errors included CMD-2 SND KLOE Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  28. BaBar vs.other ee data (r-w interference region) • mass calibration of BaBar checked with ISR-produced J/y mm • expect (0.16  0.16) MeV at  peak •  mass can be determined through mass distribution fit (in progress) • Novosibirsk data precisely calibrated using resonant depolarization • comparison BaBar/CMD-2/SND in - interference region shows no evidence for a mass shift CMD-2 SND Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  29. BaBar vs. IB-corrected  data (0.5-1.0 GeV) relative comparison w.r.t. BaBar of isospin-breaking corrected t spectral functions BaBar data averaged in wider t bins and corrected for - interference Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  30. Computing ampp ALEPH-CLEO-OPAL (DEHZ 2006) (DEHZ 2003) (2008) ampp(1010) FSR correction was missing in Belle, new value 523.5  3.0  2.5 Direct comparison 0.630-0.958 GeV BaBar 369.3  0.8  2.2 CMD-2 94-95 362.1  2.4  2.2 CMD-2 98 361.5  1.7  2.9 SND 361.0  1.2  4.7 Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  31. Conclusions • BaBar analysis of pp and mm ISR processes completed • Precision goal has been achieved: 0.6% in  region (0.6-0.9 GeV) • Absolute mm cross section agrees with NLO QED within 1.2% • Preliminary results available for pp in the range 0.5-3 GeV • Structures observed in pion form factor at large masses • Comparison with results from earlier experiments • discrepancy with CMD-2 and SND mostly below  • large disagreement with KLOE • better agreement with t results, especially Belle • Contribution to am from BaBar agrees better with t results • Deviation between BNL measurement and theory prediction significantly reduced using BaBar pp data a[exp] –a[SM]=(27.5 ±8.4)  10–10  (14.0  8.4)  1010 • Wait for final results and contributions of multi-hadronic modes Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  32. Backup Slides Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  33. PID correction to mm cross section Two running periods with different IFR performance Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  34. Measurement of p-ID efficiencies • ‘’ ID is a set of negative conditions • use  sample from ISR-produced  with h tag: • 0.6<m<0.9 GeV impurity = (3.70.5) 103 • ID and mis-ID efficiencies stored in 2D maps • unlike muons, efficiency sample is not from isolated tracks • biases from tagging and correlated loss studied with MC • 10-3 level Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  35. PID correction to pp cross section Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  36. 2 cut Efficiency Correction: Interactions ppgg loose c2 • secondary interactions mostly from beam pipe (tight doca cut on tracks) • tag events with interactions using displaced vertex with a ‘bad’ track in transverse plane (Rxy) • agreement data/MC 1.00  0.16 loose c2 1.07  0.11 tight c2 syst error 0.5-1.5 10-3 Beam pipe tight c2 Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  37. Mass Calibration Effect of a 1 MeV mass scale shift (calibration with J/y : (0.16  0.16) MeV) mpp (GeV) Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  38. Present BaBar Measurements only statistical errors syst. 5-10% to obtain R in the energy range 1-2 GeV the processes +-30, +-40, K+K-, KSKL, KSKL, KSK+-0 remain to be measured Tau08 22-25/9/2008

  39. BaBar Impact on Multi-Hadronic Modes • Using ISR method the cross sections of e+e +0, 2+2, K+K+, 2K+2Kreactions have been measured from threshold to 4.5 GeV. • These are the most precise measurements to date for c.m. energies greater than 1.4 GeV. • Examples: contributions to ahad (1010) from 2+ 2(0.56 – 1.8 GeV) from all e+ e exp. 14.21  0.87exp  0.23rad from all  data 12.35  0.96exp  0.40SU(2) fromBaBar 12.95  0.64exp  0.13rad from +  0(1.055  1.8 GeV) from all e+ e exp. 2.45  0.26exp  0.03rad fromBaBar 3.31  0.13exp  0.03rad • More modes to come Davier-Eidelman- Hoecker-Zhang 2003 total 696.37.2 Tau08 22-25/9/2008

More Related