1 / 45

California Emergency Management Agency Matthew Bettenhausen, Secretary

California Emergency Management Agency Matthew Bettenhausen, Secretary. Grants Management Branch. Brendan Murphy Director. Deputy Director Larry Davis. OT Keri Nunez 322-2785. Gina Buccieri-Harrington Assistant Director. Kris Whitty Branch Chief. SESC EMPG Yvonne Cantrell

bien
Télécharger la présentation

California Emergency Management Agency Matthew Bettenhausen, Secretary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. California Emergency Management Agency Matthew Bettenhausen, Secretary

  2. Grants Management Branch Brendan Murphy Director Deputy Director Larry Davis OT Keri Nunez 322-2785 Gina Buccieri-Harrington Assistant Director Kris Whitty Branch Chief SESC EMPG Yvonne Cantrell 845-8139 SSM I HSGS Ursula Harelson 322-1956 SSM I IPGS Renee Jackson 324-6118 SSM I TSGU Cindy Barrett 322-2756 SSM I TSGS Cindy Barrett 322-2756 OT Samantha Roybal 322-2734 AGPA Amber Lane 322-1901 SSA Darlene Arambula 322-9228 SSA Cameron Bardwell 322-8740 AGPA Peter Town 322-1503 OA Sourideth S. 322-2734 AGPA Scott Sano 324-6119 AGPA John Thomas 322-9235 SSA Casey Granados 322-2643 SSA Joseph Anderson 322-9067 AGPA Jason Peery 324-5947 SSA Jason Peery 324-5947 AGPA Janet Kellam 324-7179 AGPA Alice Cedillo AGPA Rakesh Sharma 322-2737 AGPA Rachel Magana 324-9314 AGPA Maybel Garing 324-9312 AGPA Aaron Wayne 322-2680 AGPA Vacant AGPA Leo LaMattina 324-6347 OA Vacant

  3. The mission of the Grants Management Branch is to enhance and improve overall customer service to our subgrantees while ensuring all grant expenditures are in compliance with state and federal requirements. Our goal is to successfully assist all California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) subgrantees with their day-to-day grant management activities. Grants Management Branch Mission

  4. The Homeland Security Grant Section (HSGS) is responsible for the overall grant management of California's State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP), Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI), Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS), and Citizen Corps Program (CCP). The HSGS conducts workshops throughout the state on grants management and grant application activities.  The HSGS is also responsible for the annual Investment Justification Planning Workshop and coordinating the development and submission of California's applications for various homeland security grant funds. Program Staff for the Homeland Security Grant Section (HSGS) include: Ursula Harelson, Section Chief (916) 322-1956 ursula.harelson@calema.ca.gov Casey Granados, Program Representative (916) 322-2643 casey.granados@calema.ca.gov Leo LaMattina, Program Representative (916) 324-6347 leo.lamattina@calema.ca.gov Maybel Garing-Espilla, Program Representative (916) 324-9312 maybel.garing@calema.ca.gov Rachel Magana, Program Representative (916) 324-9314 rachel.magana@calema.ca.gov Cameron Bardwell, Program Representative (916) 322-8740 cameron.bardwell@calema.ca.gov Joseph Anderson, Program Representative (916) 322-9067 joseph.anderson@calema.ca.gov Darlene Arambula, EHP Coordinator (916) 322-9228 darlene.arambula@calema.ca.gov Homeland Security Grant Section (HSGS)

  5. Funds used for planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercises Decisions made by “Body of Five” County Health Officer, County Sheriff, County Fire Chief, Major City Police Chief and Major City Fire Chief Homeland SecurityGrant Programs State Homeland Security Program$107,498,340 statewide FY2010

  6. Funds used for planning, training, exercises and equipment California Cities designated as Urban Areas: San Diego, Anaheim/Santa Ana, Long Beach/Los Angeles, Sacramento, Bay Area, Riverside, Oxnard, Bakersfield Requires local Urban Area Working Group (UAWG) for decision making Distribution amounts are chosen by FEMA and allocated through FEMA formula Homeland SecurityGrant Programs Urban Areas Security Initiative$154,487,517 statewide FY2010

  7. A pass-through grant to the California Volunteers who runs the program A national network of state, local, and tribal Citizen Corps Councils These Councils build on community strengths to implement the Citizen Corps programs and will carry out a local strategy to have every American participate Homeland SecurityGrant Programs Citizen Corps Program$986,002 statewide FY2010

  8. 18 California cities receive this funding Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose, Long Beach, Oakland, Sacramento, Fresno, Santa Ana, Anaheim, Riverside, Glendale, Huntington Beach, Stockton, Bakersfield, Fremont, Modesto and San Bernardino. Increase response capability to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, & Explosive (CBRNE) incidents MMRS Steering Committee and local jurisdictions establish funding criteria Homeland SecurityGrant Programs Metropolitan Medical Response System Grant$5,713,542 statewide FY2010

  9. Eligible Applicants for Homeland Security funding: Operational Areas (OA) Includes the Metropolitan Medical Response Systems (MMRS) Native American Tribes – represented by a single coordinating group Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Jurisdictions (8 federally designated jurisdictions in California) State Agencies (SA), Departments, Commissions, Boards, etc. who have, or can obtain, appropriate state Department of Finance (DOF) budget authority for awarded funds Includes the Citizen Corps Program (CCP) awarded to the California Volunteers Homeland Security Grant Section (HSGS)

  10. Homeland Security Funding for California FY 2010: SHSGP $107,498,340 UASI $154,487,517 MMRS $ 5,713,542 CCP $ 986,002 Total $268,685,401 Homeland Security Grant Section (HSGS)

  11. The Infrastructure Protection Grant Section (IPGS) is responsible for the overall grant management of the Non Profit Security Grant Program (NSGP), Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP),Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Program (PSIC), Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP),Buffer Zone Protection Grant Program (BZPP), Chemical Buffer Zone Protection Program (ChemBZPP), Border Interoperability Demonstration Pilot Program (BIDP), West Coast Maritime Pilot Program (WCMP), Operation Stonegarden (OPSG), California Port and Maritime Security Grant Program (CPMSGP) funded from Proposition 1B funds. Program Staff for the IPGS include: Renee A. Mota-Jackson, Section Chief (916) 322-2614 renee.jackson@calema.ca.gov Scott Sano, Program Representative (916) 324-6119 scott.sano@calema.ca.gov Peter Town, Program Representative (916) 322-1503 peter.town@calema.ca.gov Rakesh Sharma, Program Representative (916) 322-2737 rakesh.sharma@calema.ca.gov Alice Cedillo, Program Representative (916) 322-2743 alice.cedillo@calema.ca.gov Infrastructure Protection Grant Section(IPGS)

  12. Background: Each Nonprofit must apply through their State Administrative Agency (SAA) for up to a $75,000 award. The California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) is the SAA for the NSGP grant. Grant program is designed to promote coordination and collaboration of emergency preparedness activities between public and private community representatives, state and local government agencies, and Citizen Corps Councils. Eligible Applicants: Nonprofit organizations that are at high-risk of terrorist attack and located within one of the eligible Urban Areas nationwide. Criteria for determining eligible applicants who are at high-risk of terrorist attack includes, but is not limited to: Identification and substantiation (e.g. police reports or insurance claims) of prior threats or attacks (within or outside the U.S.) by a terrorist organization, network, or cell against the nonprofit organization Symbolic value of the site(s) as a highly recognized national or historical institution that renders the site a possible target of terrorism UASI Non-Profit Security Grant (NSGP)

  13. NSGP Funding for California: FY 2007 $3,386,118 56 subgrantees FY 2008 $4,089,001 60 subgrantees FY 2009 $1,836,562 26 subgrantees FY 2010 $3,348,668 46 subgrantees UASI Non-Profit Security Grant (NSGP)

  14. Background: The RCPGP is intended to enhance regional catastrophic preparedness and continuity of operations efforts, with the aim of strengthening the Nation against risks associated with catastrophic events. Eligible Applicants: Nationally - Eligible applicants for the RCPGP include the 11 pre-designated high-risk, high-consequence urban areas within the 10 RCPGP sites.  California - In California, the Los Angeles Urban Area and Bay Area Urban Area are eligible to apply. Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP)

  15. RCPGP Funding for California: FY 2007-2008 Bay Area Site: Non Competitive $6,000,000 Competitive $1,500,000 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside Site Non Competitive $6,000,000 FY 2009 Bay Area Site: Non Competitive $3,617,000 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside Site: Non Competitive $3,617,000 FY 2010 Bay Area Site: Non Competitive $3,570,000 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside Site: Non Competitive $3,570,000 Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP)

  16. Background: The PSIC grant program is a one-time formula based, matching grant program intended to enhance interoperable communications with respect to voice, data and/or video signals. The match required was a 20% cost share that could be met through cash match or in-kind donation of equipment or services. The PSIC provides public safety agencies with the opportunity to achieve meaningful and measureable improvements to the state of public safety communications interoperability through the full and efficient use of all telecommunications resources. Eligible Applicants: The Governor of each state and territory has designated a State Administrative Agency (SAA) which can apply for and administer the funds under the PSIC grant program.  The SAA is responsible for obligating PSIC funds to eligible pass-through recipients, which is statutorily defined as a public safety agency that is a State, local, or tribal government entity or nongovernmental organization authorized by such entity, whose sole or principal purpose is to protect safety of life, health, or property. Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Program (PSIC)

  17. PSIC Funding for California: FY 2007 $94,034,510 28 subgrantees Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Program (PSIC)

  18. Background: The IECGP grant program provides funding to improve local, tribal, regional, statewide, and national interoperable emergency communications, including communications in collective response to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters. The IECGP funding is provided to states, territories, local and tribal governments to support achievement of the goals, objectives, and/or initiatives of the Statewide Communication Interoperability Plans and to ensure achievement of the goals and milestones of the National Emergency Communications Plan. Eligible Applicants: The Governor of each State and territory has designated a State Administrative Agency (SAA), which can apply for and administer the funds under IECGP. The SAA is the only agency eligible to apply for IECGP funds. In California, IECGP funds are awarded to eligible Urban Areas in each of the four California Statewide Interoperability Executive Committee (CALSIEC) Planning Areas; Northern, Central, Capital/Bay, and Southern. Where a Planning Area does not have an eligible Urban Area, subgrantees will consist of any Operational Area or tribe selected by the Planning Area committee. Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP)

  19. IECGP Funding for California: FY 2008 $6,107,351 10 subgrantees FY 2009 $6,089,369 8 subgrantees FY 2010 $5,480,000 # of subgrantees pending Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP)

  20. Background: The BZPP provides funding to states to secure critical infrastructure including chemical facilities, financial institutions, nuclear and electric power plants, dams, stadiums, and other high-risk/high consequence facilities. The State Administrative Agency (SAA) is the only entity eligible formally to apply for BZPP funds. Eligible Applicants: Specific BZPP sites within 45 states have been selected based on their level of risk and criticality. Each state with a BZPP site is eligible to submit applications for its local communities to participate in and receive funding under the program. Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP)

  21. BZPP Funding for California: FY 2007 $4,695,000 10 subgrantees FY 2008 $7,379,000 9 subgrantees FY 2009 $5,200,000 # of subgrantees pending FY 2010 $5,200,000 # of subgrantees pending Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP)

  22. Background: This one-year program provides funds to support the implementation of a Regional Buffer Zone Plan in a region and outside the perimeters of identified chemical sector critical infrastructure/key resource sites. Eligible Applicants: Specific BZPP sites within 51 States and territories have been selected based on their level of risk and criticality. Each State with a BZPP site is eligible to submit applications for its local communities to participate in and receive funding under the FY 2006 BZPP. BZPP funding allocated to any given State or territory is a function of the number, type, and character of the pre-identified sites within that State or territory. ChemBZPP funding is specifically focused on enhancing the protection of those Critical Infrastructure/Key Resources that, if attacked, could cause WMD-like effects – e.g., chemical storage and manufacturing facilities, refineries, etc. Chemical Buffer Zone Protection Program (ChemBZPP)

  23. ChemBZPP Funding for California: FY 2006 $6,597,100 1 subgrantee Chemical Buffer Zone Protection Program (ChemBZPP)

  24. Background: The purpose of the BIDP is to explore innovative and effective models of interoperable emergency communications systems and approaches that improve emergency communications along and across the U.S. border; and that can be shared with and adapted to other U.S. border communities. Eligible Applicants: Any local and tribal governments and emergency response providers operating within a county or other jurisdiction contiguous to an international border with Canada or Mexico are eligible to apply for this grant. Border Interoperability Demonstration Project (BIDP)

  25. BIDP Funding for California: One applicant, the City of San Diego. Award amount to be determined. Border Interoperability Demonstration Project (BIDP)

  26. Background: The United States Department of Homeland Security Domestic Nuclear Detection Office established the FY 10 West Coast Maritime Pilot to develop and assess preventive radiological/nuclear detection capability to address the risk of such materials entering our Nation's waterways on small vessels Eligible Applicants: The state is the only eligible applicant. The Department of Homeland Security has chosen City of San Diego and the California Department of Fish and Game to participate in the pilot program. West Coast Maritime Pilot (WCMP)

  27. WCMP Funding for California: FY 2010 City of San Diego $459,756 Department of Fish and Game $ 32,063 West Coast Maritime Pilot (WCMP)

  28. Background: Operation Stonegarden Grant Program provides funding to designated localities to enhance cooperation between federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies in a joint mission to secure the US borders along routes of ingress from international borders, including states bordering Mexico and Canada, as well as territories near international borders. Eligible Applicants: Local units of government at the county level and federally-recognized tribal governments in the states bordering Canada(including Alaska), southern states bordering Mexico, and  states and territories with international water borders.   Operation Stonegarden Grant Program (OPSG)

  29. OPSG Funding for California: FY 2008 San Diego County Sheriff $5,580,000 Imperial County Sheriff $2,070,000 FY 2009 San Diego County Sheriff $8,844,033 Imperial County Sheriff $3,075,307 FY 2009 Supplemental San Diego County Sheriff $8,844.033 Imperial County Sheriff $3,075,307 FY 2010 San Diego County Sheriff $8,844,033 Imperial County Sheriff $2,926,239 Riverside County Sheriff $ 400,030 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program (OPSG)

  30. Background: As a result of voter-approved Proposition 1B in November 2006 (“Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act”), the California Ports and Maritime Security Grant Program was created. The purpose of the program is to provide funding to enhance security amongst the eleven publically-owned ports throughout California. Eligible Applicants: Port of Los Angeles Port of Long Beach Port of Hueneme Oxnard Harbor District Port of San Francisco Port of Oakland Port of Redwood City Port of Richmond Stockton Unified Port District Port of West Sacramento Port of Humboldt Bay Harbor Recreation and Conservation District California Ports and Maritime Security Grant Program (CPMSGP)

  31. CPMSGP Funding for California: $97,000,000 was appropriated and split between two fiscal years. FY 2007 $40,000,000 FY 2008 $57,000,000 California Ports and Maritime Security Grant Program (CPMSGP)

  32. The Transit Security Grant Section (TSGS) is responsible for the overall grant management of the Transit Security Grant Program , Transit Security Grant - Ferry, Transit Security Grant Program - Supplemental and Proposition 1B Transit related programs.  Program Staff for the TSGS include: Cindy Barrett, Section Chief (916) 322-2756 cynthia.barrett@calema.ca.gov Jason Peery, Program Representative (916) 324-5947 jason.peery@calema.ca.gov Janet Kellam, Program Representative (916) 324-7179 janet.kellam@calema.ca.gov Amber Lane, Program Representative (916) 322-1905 amber.lane@calema.ca.gov Aaron Wayne, Program Representative (916) 322-2680 aaron.wayne@calema.ca.gov Samantha Roybal, Office Technician (916) 322-2734 samantha.roybal@calema.ca.gov Transit Security Grant Section(TSGS)

  33. Background: On October 18, 2004 , the President signed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Appropriations Act of 2005. The Transit Security Grants were first created under the Act to provide funds to surface transportation owners and operators for projects designed to protect the traveling public from threats such as terrorist acts or natural disasters. Under the program, the California Emergency Management Agency’s Transit Security Grant Section manages DHS’s Infrastructure Protection Program, Transit Security Grant Program awards for fiscal years 2005 through 2008. Grant activities are coordinated through four Regional Transit Security Working Groups (RTSWG): RTSWG 1 – Los Angeles Area RTSWG 2 – San Francisco Bay Area RTSWG 3 – Sacramento Area RTSWG 4 – San Diego Area Eligible Recipients: Under the program, seventeen California transit agencies have been awarded grants totaling $112,339,603. Recipients include intracity bus, commuter bus, ferries and passenger rail systems. Eligibility is based on a number of factors such as ridership or vulnerability of key assets with local and region wide significance. Transit Security Grant Section(TSGS)

  34. TSGP Funding for California FY 2005 TSGP TIER I: Los Angeles Region (4 subgrantees) $6,418,810 San Francisco Bay Area Region ( 7 subgrantees) $9,602,710 TIER II: San Diego Region ( 2 subgrantees) $2,570,500 Sacramento Region ( 1 subgrantee) $606,220 FY 2006 TSGP TIER I: Los Angeles Region ( 4 subgrantees) $6,212,000 San Francisco Bay Area Region ( 8 subgrantees) $10,903,000 TIER II: San Diego Region ( 2 subgrantees $1,245,500 Sacramento Region ( 1 subgrantee) $476,897 Transit Security Grant Section(TSGS)

  35. Transit Security Grant Section(TSGS) TSGP Funding for California: FY 2007 TSGP (Base) TIER I: Los Angeles Region ( 4 subgrantees) $6,847,264 San Francisco Bay Area Region ( 8 subgrantees) $13,401,865 TIER II: San Diego Region ( 1 subgrantee) $55,071 FY 2007 TSGP (Supplemental) TIER I: Los Angeles Region ( 6 subgrantees) $4,171,000 San Francisco Bay Area Region ( 8 subgrantees) $8,148,000 TIER II: San Diego Region ( 1 subgrantee) $1,200,000 Sacramento Region ( 1 subgrantee) $739,639

  36. Transit Security Grant Section(TSGS) TSGP Funding for California: FY 2007 TSGP (Ferry) TIER I: Los Angeles Region ( 1 subgrantee) $122,581 San Francisco Bay Area Region ( 2 subgrantees) $586,714 FY 2008 TSGP TIER I: Los Angeles Region ( 5 subgrantees) $13,106,074 San Francisco Bay Area Region( 7 subgrantees) $24,655,391 TIER II: San Diego Region ( 2 subgrantees) $2,348,338 Sacramento Region ( 1 subgrantee) $467,300

  37. California Transit Security Grant Program Intercity Passenger Rail/Commuter Rail Systems(CTSGP-IPCR) Background: The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, approved by the voters as Proposition 1B at the November 07, 2006 general election, authorizes the issuance of nineteen billion nine hundred twenty five million dollars ($19,925,000,000) in general obligation bonds for specified purposes, including grants for transit system safety, security and disaster response projects. Eligible Applicants: The eligible recipients for these funds are set forth in Section 14035 and the commuter rail systems operated by the entities specified in Section 14072 and in Section 99314.1 of the Public Utilities Code. Funding for California: 15%- $15,000,000 awarded annually pending bond sales.

  38. California Transit Security Grant Program Regional Public Waterborne Transit(CTSGP-RPWT) Background: The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, approved by the voters as Proposition 1B at the November 07, 2006 general election, authorizes the issuance of nineteen billion nine hundred twenty five million dollars ($19,925,000,000) in general obligation bonds for specified purposes, including grants for transit system safety, security and disaster response projects. Eligible Applicants: Pursuant to section 66540.8 set forth in SB 976 the Water Emergency Transit Authority (WETA) shall have the power to apply for, receive and expend funds for public transportation ferries and related facilities and services, and emergency water transportation for disaster recovery within the bay area region. WETA shall be entitled to receive and shall be disbursed funds under subdivision (b) of Section 8879.57 that would have been allocated to any other waterborne transit agency that, as of the effective date of that section would not be or have been eligible to receive State Transit Assistance Funds but for the effect of this act. WETA may further allocate funds received from Cal EMA pursuant to this program to other public entities for eligible capital expenditures as outlined below. Funding for California: 25% - $25,000,000 awarded annually pending bond sales.

  39. California Transit Security Grant Program California Transit Assistance Fund(CTSGP-CTAF) Background: The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, approved by the voters as Proposition 1B at the November 07, 2006 general election, authorizes the issuance of nineteen billion nine hundred twenty five million dollars ($19,925,000,000) in general obligation bonds for specified purposes, including grants for transit system safety, security and disaster response projects. Eligible Recipients: The Controller shall provide a list of eligible agencies and transit operators, including the amount of funds each is eligible to receive from the account pursuant to subdivision. The amount of funds will be proportional to the share received from the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds, pursuant to Sections 99313 and 99314 of the Public Utilities Code, over fiscal years 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07. All amounts will be reduced for administrative costs and loan interest until the loan is repaid. Funding for California: 60% - $60,000,000 awarded annually pending bond sales.

  40. Yvonne Cantrell, Sr. Emer. Services Coord. (916) 845-8139 yvonne.cantrell@calema.ca.gov John Thomas, Program Representative (916) 322-9235 john.thomas@calema.ca.gov Emergency Management Grants Section (EMGS) The Emergency Management Grants Section is responsible for the administration of the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) and the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant. Both grants are offered on a yearly basis. The Emergency Management Grants Section is responsible for coordinating the development of the applications and the local guidance documents for each of the grant programs. Application workshops are held for the grant recipients. Program staff provide guidance and technical assistance to grant recipients, agency staff and other interested parties as needed. Program Staff for the Emergency Management Grants Section include:

  41. Background: The Emergency Management Performance Grant has been in existence for decades. The purpose of this grant is to ensure state, local and tribal governmental entities maintain a comprehensive emergency management program compatible with the federal government. It encourages the maintenance and improvement of mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery capabilities for all hazards through planning, training and exercise activities. Eligible Recipients: Emergency management organizations and programs of state, local and tribal governments. Emergency Management Grants Section (EMGS) Emergency Management Performance Grant

  42. Funding: 2010 - $26,044,455 statewide $12,044,455 State portion $14,000,000 Local portion Funding Allocation: A portion of the grant is kept at the state level and the remainder is subgranted to the 58 Operational Areas and Tribal Nations on a base plus population basis. The Tribal portion is allocated on a competitive basis. Emergency Management Grants Section (EMGS) Emergency Management Performance Grant

  43. Background: This grant has been in existence since 2008 and is awarded on a yearly basis. The purpose of the grant is to construct or renovate a state, local or tribal jurisdiction’s principal emergency operations center. This grant is a nationwide, competitive grant. Emergency Management Grant Section (EMGS) Emergency Operations Center Grant

  44. Eligible Recipients: Recipients vary from year to year. Recipients in 2010 are: City of Brawley City of Monterey Park City of Commerce City of Moreno Valley City of Cupertino City of Whittier City of Elk Grove San Francisco Department of Emergency Management City of La Habra Trinity County Funding: $4,996,659 statewide in 2010 Emergency Management Grant Section (EMGS) Emergency Operations Center Grant

  45. On Behalf of the Homeland Security, Prop 1B, and Emergency Management Branch, Thank You For Your Continued Cooperation and Support.

More Related