1 / 14

Surface Water Quantity Model Development

Surface Water Quantity Model Development. Connely Baldwin USU. Overview. Do the first checkpoint Summarize management options relating to water quantity. Identify higher priority/more implementable management options

billy
Télécharger la présentation

Surface Water Quantity Model Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surface Water Quantity Model Development Connely Baldwin USU

  2. Overview • Do the first checkpoint • Summarize management options relating to water quantity. • Identify higher priority/more implementable management options • Assign processes, parameters, and geographic locations to each management option to be incorporated in the surface water quantity model. • Describe TOPNET in more detail • Present plan for early prototype

  3. Phase III • Develop the model…and NOW – compress 12 months of work into 4 • Components: • Rainfall-runoff transformation • Evapotranspiration calculation • Water use calculation • Ecological flow and water rights accounting • Diversion/storage accounting • Integration with ground water model

  4. Phase III cont’d • Integration of these parts: Note: The number in parentheses is the item number from the previous slide

  5. Management option check point • Generic rainfall-runoff transformation model design • Determining which processes are needed in which drainages (snow melt, glacier dynamics, drainage modifications, etc.) • Design of the required processes • Evapotranspiration component design • Water use component design • Ecological flow and water rights accounting • Diversion/storage accounting • Integration of ground water model components • Land-use and land cover modifier (user-interface component) • Diversion/inter-basin transfer locator (user-interface component) • Storage locator, including ASR, on-stream reservoir, and off-stream reservoir (user-interface component) Phase III Milestones/Checkpoints “To facilitate communication with the water quantity Technical Team, several milestones are identified that represent significant points at which agreement on the approach will be obtained through regular conference calls.”

  6. Management Options Check Point and Prioritization • B - [Trans-drainage] diversions, storage (any type) • A- Water use changes (add new uses, change SW to GW) • A - Land use changes (development, irrigation eff.) • A - Water use rate changes [per unit area based on land use] • A - GW augmentation of surface water flows in low-flow period • C - Water rights enforcement • A - Examine sensitivity of system to exempt well water use • C - Tile Drains

  7. Generic Rainfall-runoff Transformation Model Design • TOPMODEL (Beven and Kirkby, 1979 and later) applied to each upland drainage. • Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration. • Vegetation interception component. • Soil zone • Adjust ET soil moisture availability in root zone • Infiltration excess runoff generation capabiity • Unsaturated zone storage and drainage • Parameters averaged over each drainage. • Kinematic wave routing of stream flow through channel network. • Various changes to stream flow (use, rights limitations, diversions to other drainages)

  8. Hydraulic conductivity decreasing with depth TOPNET – Upland Drainages Precipitation Derived from existing daily stations and PRISM surface Potential ET demand Penman-Monteith Pre-built subroutine Snow, glacier (Utah Energy Balance) Mass and Energy Balance Model Interception Store Wind Disaggregated from Recent data Canopy Capacity CC (m) =x1 weighted in subbasins Canopy Storage CV (m) =S Throughfall Infiltration Excess Runoff Saturation Excess Runoff Soil Store SR(m) =Soil Zone water content Parameters Zr=depth from root zone info, Dq1,,Dq2, K0 , f , Implicit Param. Variables SOILCr= zr*(Dq1-Dq2), If z < zr SR enhanced locally to Zr Z Recharge Saturated lateral flow driven by topographic gradient Saturated Soil Storedistribution of wetness index Baseflow

  9. Precipitation, Temperature Derived from daily data and PRISM surface TOPNET – Lowland Drainages Wind Disaggregated from Recent data Potential ET demand Penman-Monteith Pre-built subroutine Snow, glacier (Utah Energy Balance) Mass and Energy Balance Model Interception Store Canopy Capacity CC (m) =x1 weighted in subbasins Canopy Storage CV (m) =S Infiltration Excess Runoff Throughfall Saturation Excess Runoff Soil Store SR(m) =Soil Zone water content Parameters Zr=depth from root zone info, Dq1,,Dq2, K0 , f , Implicit Param. Variables SOILCr= zr*(Dq1-Dq2), If z < zr SR enhanced locally to Hydraulic conductivity decreasing with depth Zr Z Recharge Lumped Parameter GW Store Model 7 drainages – Model parameters from available data Other – extrapolated from available data MODFLOW 3 drainages – more work to link to TOPNET Baseflow

  10. Evapotranspiration • Pre-built Penman-Monteith subroutine to calculate daily reference ET (see Handbook of Hydrology, 2d edition (1996), Ch 4 for gory details) • Adjusted to actual ET using daily Kc values based on land cover (lookup tables)

  11. Water Use • Based on WRIA 1 Water Accounting Model (WWAM) as possible (use their rates as defaults, codify the setup as tables in database) • Differences: Reference ET calculated daily, use effective precipitation to estimate agricultural water use • Possible extensions: • Account for PUD water use by source location (Cherry Point) – generalized or aggregated as needed • Allow estimates of exempt well water use (sensitivity) • Changes from surface water to ground water withdrawal

  12. Ecological Flow and Water Rights Accounting • Priority-based enforcement • Starting point for data: WRIA 1 GIS layer/Water rights and applications database • Grouping of water rights by drainage (report reliability at drainage level) • Buying senior water rights (devote to ecological flow) • IRPP flows

  13. Diversion/Storage Accounting • Diversions: Simple… take water from one drainage, put it in another • Storage: Almost as simple … take water from one drainage, hold it for a while, put it back.

  14. Integration with Ground Water Model Transient Lumped Parameter Model – replaces the Topmodel saturated zone component – relatively simple MODFLOW – recharge disaggregation (develop a general procedure, use GIS layers) Water use issues – agricultural and rural residential water use returns to ground water add to soil store, municipal use returns to a surface water body (to be quantified). Visualization – differentiate between ground water modeling areas and extrapolated areas.

More Related