1 / 12

VDM Scan in Lead-Lead (Scan-III) … VERY preliminary

VDM Scan in Lead-Lead (Scan-III) … VERY preliminary. ALICE TM. Pb+Pb van der Meer Scan. and with multi BX condition. Remember: 114 colliding bunch pairs With 1 BX, intensity is too low to measure Luminosity at head-on bunch intensity of Beam-1 bunch intensity of Beam-2

bing
Télécharger la présentation

VDM Scan in Lead-Lead (Scan-III) … VERY preliminary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VDM Scan in Lead-Lead(Scan-III) … VERY preliminary K. Oyama, Heidelberg ALICE TM

  2. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Pb+Pb van der Meer Scan

  3. K. Oyama, Heidelberg and with multi BX condition • Remember: 114 colliding bunch pairs • With 1 BX, intensity is too low to measure • Luminosity at head-on • bunch intensity of Beam-1 • bunch intensity of Beam-2 • choose all colliding bunch combinations • vdM scan shape factor (height divided by area ) • No distinguishing possible for shape factor among BXs (assumption needed) • Cross Section

  4. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Intensity • Intensities distribute in factor 2 • Stable during the scan time within <2.7% • Bunch product of:6085.8x1018 [charges2]is used as

  5. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Reduced BCMask • Colliding bunches … 114 • BCMaks set only for 30 (SPD phase to be constant) • Scaling and proper calculation of beam current required  to be done • Currently, all C* triggers should be scaled by factor 114/30=3.8 for the rate (cross section) • ZDC triggers are all without BCMask, no correction needed

  6. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Pileup and Emittance Corrections 1ZSD • Highest rate observed • 1ZSD reached 6000 Hz • Negligibly small • No further consideration about pileup • Emittance is significantly decreasedduring the scan (few %) • Normal straight line fit (gray line inthe right plot) and correction applied • Later, decoupling Emittance correction and beam intensity is in plan

  7. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Some Anomaly in Data (I) • Strange peak seen in • C0OM3 • C0SMH • C0TVX • CVBAND • Including AC/E masks • Little or invisible inZDC and Muon C0OM3

  8. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Some Anomaly in Data (II) • C0TSC is not possible to analyze because of missing data • To be checked

  9. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Scan Shapes • Almost perfect Gaussian with baselinefor most of triggers D [mm]

  10. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Background • 121 bunches in, and 114 collisions • Background may scales with (114*2) / (7*2) = factor 16 • Data shows factor 8/0.8~10 … more/less OK

  11. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Cross Sections (VERY PRELIMINARY) ! Scaled with factor 3.8 for BCMask correction * Errors are all partial statistical (not fully considered) * Up to 5 to 10% statistical error are there for width

  12. K. Oyama, Heidelberg Summary • Preliminary result of Pb+Pb van der Meer scan shown • 1ZED: 362 barn … comparable to estimation by Nora, Chiara et.al., • PWG2 on Mar.15, 2011: =185 b, =5.9 b, =7.8 b • TM on Nov.05, 2010: 2x185 - 5.9 + 7.8 = 372 barn • CVBAND: 10.6 barn … comparable to =8b with 8 fmPb radius • EM events cross section to be added • C0SMH: 6 barn … pure nuclear interactions, consistency check with Glauber possible? • However, please consider central value may significantly move • To be done: • Satellite bunch and ghost charge analysis (to/from BCNWG) • Background study • Precise bunch intensity with proper selection of BX for C* triggers • Cross checks … Which process? Inter-experiments?

More Related