SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Legal Framework Guidelines for Effective Coalition Management and Risk Mitigation

blithe avatar
blithe
8 diapositives · 230 Views · Jul 10, 2014

This document outlines best practices for when to seek legal counsel in coalition management. It emphasizes that legal issues aren’t always necessary and suggests that simple Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) may suffice. Key deliverables include accessible samples and a guide for bilateral hosting in ten steps. The working group aims to ensure legal language aligns with coalition values while addressing risks, accountability, and intellectual property concerns among members. The importance of a flexible legal framework that supports trust-based culture and encourages responsible risk management is highlighted.

#legal framework guidelines for effective coalition management and risk mitigation #legal framework guidelines for effective coalition management and risk mitigation ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Legal Framework Guidelines for Effective Coalition Management and Risk Mitigation - slide 1
01 / 8Legal Framework Guidelines for Effective Coalition Management and Risk Mitigation
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Legal Framework Guidelines for Effective Coalition Management and Risk Mitigation
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Shared IT Services - Legal issues CSG 5/14/09

  2. When to use legal? • Not always appropriate • In some cases simple MOUs can provide all that is need • Samples collected and will be made available (Deliverable 1) • Your bilateral hosting in 10 easy steps (Deliverable 2) • OK if not everyone can follow the steps • Need to assure legal language is supporting our values

  3. NACUA next steps • Working group believes that our lawyers can represent our values and assure our needs are represented • May be not be applicable with external counsels • Working group to provide NACUA with charter and work with NACUA task force (Deliverable 3) • Legal framework to provide structure for conso • Outline our principles/values and trust based culture • Draft created in the working group

  4. Issues to address with NACUA • Liability and risk • Early risk assessment • Avoid strict liability, in favor of accountability for negligence for coalition members while pushing for strict liability from Providers unless the Providers are coalition members. How do we shift focus from liability to negligence among members? • No risk transfer from institution to institution  • Consortium can take on more risk. Aggregating risk where there are no assets is  a good thing. • Intellectual property • Design narrow scope to HE peers, member agreements may be preferable • Whose Laws? Arbitration?

  5. Risk matrix • No risk transferred from one Institution to another • It is OK for the consortium to take more risk (aggregation of risk) • Corporations with strict liability

  6. Covenant • Coalition model • NYSER net • Careful not to have consortia that server consortia has to follow the members (should be starving and easily started and stopped) • Designated negotiator • P2P • With disposable service (student e-mail) neither is needed

  7. Coalitions of the willing • Lightweight coalitions perhaps in Educause or other umbrella organization • Owns assets of the child consortia • Provides framework • Amazon z-store model • Add hoc aggregations • Not geographically aligned • Time and issue • Built on common foundational principles

  8. Foundational principles • Trust-rich • Ad-Hoc alliances, Temporal nature • Not to sustain itself, its mission driven by needs of members, fiduciary responsibility secondary • Coalitions have to be ready to dissolve themselves • Metrics for success • Sunset date – strongly encouraged