1 / 28

Design Improvement of a U-Profile Extrusion Die Using Inverse CFD Simulation

2005 CFD Summit The Meeting of the Minds in Flow Modeling June 7-9, 2005 Dearborn, Michigan. Design Improvement of a U-Profile Extrusion Die Using Inverse CFD Simulation. M. Kostic , Northern Illinois University Srinivasa Rao Vaddiraju , Northern Illinois University

brent
Télécharger la présentation

Design Improvement of a U-Profile Extrusion Die Using Inverse CFD Simulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2005 CFD SummitThe Meeting of the Minds in Flow ModelingJune 7-9, 2005Dearborn, Michigan Design Improvement of a U-Profile Extrusion Die Using Inverse CFD Simulation M. Kostic, Northern Illinois University Srinivasa Rao Vaddiraju, Northern Illinois University Louis G. Reifschneider, Illinois State University

  2. Motivation and Objectives • To design and fabricate a U-profile die for testing using a laboratory extruder • To assess the role of CFD simulation for extrusion die design • (1) die swell • (2) mass flow balance, and • (3) optimum die profile-shape • How the simulation results compare to actual experimental results • To assess the role of the calibrator in shaping the final profile of the extrudate • Cooling simulation in the calibrator using the experimental data

  3. The flow is steady and incompressible Polyflow Inverse Extrusion SimulationGeneral Assumptions : Body forces and Inertia effects are negligible in comparison with viscous and pressure forces. Specific heat at constant pressure, Cp, andthermal conductivity, k, are assumed constant

  4. 27.94 mm 25.4 mm (2.54 mm thick) Required Extrudate Profile

  5. h ( T ) & h g = 0 ( T , ) , where - 1 n & h g æ ö ( T ) + 1 0 ç ÷ t * è ø é ù - A ( T D ) h = - 1 2 ( T ) D exp ê ú 0 1 + - A ( T D ) ë û 2 2 Viscosity Model: Cross-WLF HIPS: DOW Styron 478 (MFI=6) BASF 496N (MFI=2.8) Pseudoplacticity included Viscoelastic effects neglected.

  6. Extruder Die Mounting Plate Extruder U-Profile Adapter Plate Transition Plate Exploded View of Die Assembly Melt Flow direction Simulation determines Pre-Land & Die Land plates Pre-Land Die Land

  7. MESH 16,592 hex. elem. 19,530 nodes. Solution Windows PC, 1 GB RAM, @ 2.39 GHz, Isothermal analysis required 552 minutes CPU. Finite Element Mesh

  8. Pre-land inlet geometry fixed Die land: uniform passage Free surface exit matches target extrudate: fixed Boundary Conditions (symmetry) No slip at die surface Inlet: fully developed flow Free Surface: Zero traction & No normal velocity Symmetry Plane Exit: Zero normal stress & Plug flow

  9. Profile of the inlet to the pre-land plate was determined by a series of trial and error extrusion simulations to insure a balanced mass flow exiting the die. Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Outlet 3 Outlet 4 Outlet 5 Outlet 7 Outlet 6 Flow simulation only within the die

  10. Pressure (Pa) Velocity Magnitude (m/s) Representative Pressure and Velocity Results

  11. Die Land Pre-land Inlet Pre-land Inlet Die Land Inverse Extrusion simulation results with Pre-land and Die Land Contours Extrudate Free Surface (Target Profile) Symmetry Plane (Target Profile)

  12. Direct Extrusion simulation result with Styron 478 and Styron 496 478 direct extrusion extrudate profile 496 direct extrusion extrudate profile Target extrudate profile As expected the free surface outlet profile from the results of direct extrusion with Styron 478 is very close to the target profile we used in inverse extrusion CFD simulation.

  13. Photograph of U-Profile Die Stack

  14. Vacuum Lines Extrudate Passage Cooling Lines Stacked Plate Design: Passage matches target profile, no taper along flow direction. Vacuum Lines Vacuum Calibrator Design

  15. Cut Off Cooling Tank Schematic of U-Profile Extrusion Line with Data Acquisition Inlet IR Upper T/C Upper Exit IR Upper Calibrator Puller U-Profile Die Lower Calibrator Puller Lower Exit IR Lower T/C Product

  16. Calibrator Set-up (opened) Inlet IR Exit Top IR Die Exit Bottom IR Cooling Tank

  17. Closed Calibrator

  18. CalibratorExit Inlet Die Exit Bottom IR

  19. Corner pulling away Side wall shrinkage: 3% – 6% Air gap = shrinkage Product Shrinkage at Calibrator Exit

  20. Calibrated mass balance E G C A I Calibration rearranges mass balance Air cushion mass balance P@3 kg/hr (most uniform thickness) is 6% thinner than target: draw down and shrinkage affects.

  21. Fredette Order of magnitude difference: can testing results be generalized? HeatTransferData Temperature data input to transient 1-D simulation to iterate for effective heat transfer between extrudate and calibrator.

  22. Boundary Conditions for Extrudate Cooling Simulation Free Surface L = 50 mm + h h = h conv tot rad Tinlet = 505 K = 10 W/m2K + 15 W/m2K T = 295 K  Calibrator L = 95 mm 2 = 303 K h = 175 W/m K, T  upper 2 h = 225 W/m K, T = 297 K  lower h upper h low er V = 6.3 mm/s Adiabatic Adiabatic

  23. Evolution of Temperature Contours as Extrudate Passes Through Calibrator 150 - 200 • Temperature History Plot Points • Upper • Middle • Lower 200+ 150 - 200 100 - 150 100 - 150 50 - 100 Black area solidified Inlet Outline of full profile shown Midway < 50 Exit

  24. Center-line Temperature History at Three Critical Points

  25. Conclusions • Inverse extrusion simulation predicts profile die shape • Custom tuning of profile dies still required. • Total product design requires coupled design of the die and the calibrator, however… • Calibration design difficult due to coupled heat transfer and product deformation • difficult to gather general empirical data, • difficult to simulate due to contact element boundary conditions.

  26. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Dr. M. Kostic and S. R. Vaddiraju thank: • NICADD (Northern Illinois Centre for Accelerator and Detector Development), NIU • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL • NIU’s College of Engineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering • Dr. L. Reifschneider thanks: • College of Applied Science and Technology at Illinois State University for financial support to conduct the die design research.

  27. QUESTIONS ?

  28. Contact Information: mailto: kostic@niu.edu www.kostic.niu.edu mailto: vaddirajs@yahoo.com www.vaddiraju.com mailto: lgreifs@ilstu.edu

More Related