Feb 4, 2013 Arch Committee Mtg - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

candra
feb 4 2013 arch committee mtg n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Feb 4, 2013 Arch Committee Mtg PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Feb 4, 2013 Arch Committee Mtg

play fullscreen
1 / 7
Download Presentation
Feb 4, 2013 Arch Committee Mtg
106 Views
Download Presentation

Feb 4, 2013 Arch Committee Mtg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Feb 4, 2013 Arch Committee Mtg • Agenda: • - Status of DoDAF White Paper • - Feb 13 F2F • - INCOSE MBSE Working Group Mtg Report Out • http://www.omgwiki.org/MBSE/doku.php?id=mbse:incose_mbse_iw_2013 • - 2013 Activities • 1. Metrics • 2. Delivery of the paper • 3. Survey

  2. Feb 13 F2F • Location: General Dynamics, 1201 M St SE (Maritime Plaza) • Time: 1:30 – 3:30 pm ET • Agenda: • - 2013 Tasking • - Completion of DoDAF paper • - SE Effectiveness Survey discussion • - ask Al Brown to attend

  3. Architecture Committee - 2013 Task Plan • Proposed 2013 Tasks: • Complete DoDAF Recommendations Report • Validation of recommended metrics • Investigate an addendum to SE Effectiveness Survey on architecture subjects (both DoDAF and metrics) • Possibilities: • How to use arch earlier in trade space? • Encourage papers in area of Model-based for X and arch for soldiers • UAF awareness • SoS Pain Points • Deliverables/Products • DoDAF Recommendations Final Report • Survey Results (if pursued) • Schedule / Resources • Continue bi-weekly virtual meetings • Face-to-face meetings, aligned with SE Division meetings • Architecture Track at SE Conference • Complete DoDAF Report by mid 2013 • Issues / Concerns: • Time availability of contributing committee members

  4. Architecture Metrics • Appeal to Architecture WG 12/18/2013 – no responses to date • “Please consider helping us validate [proposed architecture measures] by providing feedback as follows: • “Are you already using any of them (please identify)? How do they help your programs make decisions specifically about the architecture, and more generally about the program? • “For any that you use, please provide feedback regarding: • Difficulty in using (level of effort, ease/difficulty in using, clarity, consistency) • Perceived benefit as lagging or leading indicator • Perceived benefit for near-term and long-term decision making. • “What architecture-related measures are you using that are not included in this table, how are they used, and how do they provide benefit?”

  5. Summary of Proposed Architecture Measures and Means* *Carson and Kohl draft paper for INCOSE

  6. System Development Performance Measurement Working Group • From Al Brown (Chair): “The work of the System Development Performance Measurement Working Group is completed with the publication of their final report with no  specific indicator recommendation at this time for Architecture.”

  7. INCOSE Model-Based SE Workshop • Presentations at http://www.omgwiki.org/MBSE/doku.php?id=mbse:incose_mbse_iw_2013 • Emphasis on open services lifecycle collaboration (OSLC) for managing model data in federated architectures throughout the lifecycle • Recognition that SysML isn’t the only modeling language • Need for tools that interface among databases (e.g., SLIM) • Implementation of STEP standards for data exchanges (AP233 (ISO10303 Part 433)) • Consideration of PLM tools for variant management