Download
1 / 1
10 likes | 120 Vues
This analysis explores the outcomes of land conservation efforts, particularly comparing the effectiveness of doubling the amount of protected land versus preventing ecological collapse into an island state. By assessing answers to critical questions about species population (spp) changes, we analyze the implications of these strategies over time. The results indicate that while doubling protected land can provide immediate benefits, failing to prevent collapse leads to long-term detrimental effects on biodiversity and species survival. The examination of these tactics reveals crucial insights for conservation planning.
E N D
Land protected original percent given doubled amount Yes, prevented (exp = 0.15) Answer to #1 Answer to #2 collapse to an island state Need to determine this for question #4 Answer to #3 No, not prevented (exp =0.35) comparing ans #1 to #3 shows the spp gain by preventing island state collapse only comparing ans #1 to #2 shows the spp gained by doubling amount of land However, if you do not prevent the collapse to an island state, spp # will change over time from your ans to #2 to the answer needed in box #4 in the lower right. Hence the comparison you need to make is between box #1 (prevent island state, but original land) and box #4 (double the land, but did not prevent collapse.
