1 / 15

Statistical Inference for Frequency Data

Statistical Inference for Frequency Data. Chapter 16. Chapter Topics. Applications of Pearson’s Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Computations Practical Significance Independence Computations Practical Significance Testing equality of 2 or more proportions Computations Test Extensions

carrington
Télécharger la présentation

Statistical Inference for Frequency Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statistical Inference for Frequency Data Chapter 16

  2. Chapter Topics • Applications of Pearson’s Chi-Square • Goodness of Fit • Computations • Practical Significance • Independence • Computations • Practical Significance • Testing equality of 2 or more proportions • Computations • Test Extensions • JMP Procedures

  3. Pearson’s Chi-Square Statistic • Statistic developed by Karl Pearson to test hypotheses about frequency data • Do not confuse with the chi-square distribution, which was derived by Helmert • Used for three purposes • Testing goodness of fit • Did our sample really come from that distribution? • Testing independence • Are gender and alcohol consumption really independent? • Testing equality of proportions • Is the proportion of residents who are college grads the same in every state?

  4. Testing Goodness of Fit • Did our sample really come from that population? • Null Hypothesis • States that the sample did come from that population • Alternative Hypothesis • States that the sample did not come from that population • The test statistic is given by: • Degrees of freedom: k-1 • Involves a value for each observation as well as a value for what the observation should have been if the sample really did come from that population

  5. Testing Goodness of Fit (continued) • The Chi-Square Distribution • We reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic computed on the previous page is greater than the critical value. df=1 df=5 df=9 df=2 χ2

  6. Testing Goodness of Fit • Did the following data come from a binomial population with 25% graduate students? • If the null hypothesis were true, then we would expect to have 75% undergraduates (150) and 25% graduates (50). • The critical value is 3.841 (α=.05,ν=1); therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. There is evidence the sample did not come from that population. • Note: the degrees of freedom are k-1

  7. Testing Goodness of Fit • Cohen developed the following measure of effect size • is the observed proportion • is the expected proportion • Guidelines are interpreted as follows: • 0.1 – small effect • 0.3 – medium effect • 0.5 – large effect

  8. Testing Goodness of Fit • Assumptions • Every sample observation must fall in one and only one category • The observations must be independent • The sample n must be large • Rules of thumb: • When we have one degree of freedom, the expected value of all cells should be at least ten • When we have two or more degrees of freedom, the expected value of all cells should be at least five • Yates’ Correction for Continuity • Apply this correction when we have one degree of freedom and the expected value of one or some cells is not appreciably greater than ten

  9. Testing Independence • Are gender and classification independent? • Null Hypothesis • States that the variables are independent • Alternative Hypothesis • States that the variables are not independent • The test statistic is given by: • Degrees of freedom: (r-1)(c-1) • Involves a value for each observation as well as a value for what the observation should have been if the variables were independent

  10. Testing Independence • Determining the Expected Value • If the variables were independent, the probability of begin a male undergraduate would be the probability of being a male times the probability of being an undergraduate • This product gives a probability. To determine the number, simply multiply that probability by the sample size • Computational Example

  11. Testing Independence • Put into a contingency table & compute expected values • Expected Values: • The Test Statistic:

  12. Testing Independence • Cramér developed the following measure of association • When the variables are independent, the numerator is 0 • When there is a perfect association, the numerator is (s-1) • Cohen’s measure of effect size is the same, and the values are interpreted the same: • 0.1 – small effect • 0.3 – medium effect • 0.5 – large effect

  13. Testing Equality of c≥2 Proportions • Null Hypothesis • States that all proportions are equal • Alternative Hypothesis • States that some proportions are not equal • The test statistic is given by: • Degrees of freedom: c-1 • Involves a value for each observation as well as a value for what the observation should have been if the proportions are equal

  14. JMP Procedures • Independence • Three columns: Two nominal and one continuous • First column: Gender • Second column: Classification • Third column: Count • Analyze | Fit Y by X | Y – Gender | X – Classification | Freq – Count | OK |

  15. Chapter Review • Applications of Pearson’s Chi-Square • Goodness of Fit • Computations • Practical Significance • Independence • Computations • Practical Significance • Testing equality of 2 or more proportions • Computations • Test Extensions • JMP Procedures

More Related