html5-img
1 / 1

Transfemoral vs. Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement

Transfemoral vs. Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement. TRANSFEMORAL Surgeon not required Anesthesiology presence preferred, even if sedation 83–100 % successful implementation (6 papers, N = 181)

chaim-olson
Télécharger la présentation

Transfemoral vs. Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transfemoral vs. Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement TRANSFEMORAL • Surgeon not required • Anesthesiology presence preferred, even if sedation • 83–100% successful implementation (6 papers, N = 181) • Good early success, higher stroke rate (2.5–10%, 4 papers, N = 249) • Probably shorter hospitalization TRANSAPICAL • Surgeon required • Anesthesiologist definitely required, possible double-lumen tube • 100% successful implementation (5 papers, N = 116) • Lower stroke rate (0–4%, 4 papers, N = 109) • Shorter hospitalization than partial sternotomy?

More Related