1 / 20

NPA-STD 11 JAR FSTD A Explanatory Paper

NPA-STD 11 JAR FSTD A Explanatory Paper. A Presentation of Capt. Manfred von Allmen, Swiss FOCA Member of JAR-STD 2A WG Chairman of JAR-STD 4A WG JAR-FSTD WG Member. Current Status JAR-STD (A). JAR-STD A Status (cont.).

chambray
Télécharger la présentation

NPA-STD 11 JAR FSTD A Explanatory Paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NPA-STD 11 JAR FSTD AExplanatory Paper A Presentation of Capt. Manfred von Allmen, Swiss FOCA Member of JAR-STD 2A WG Chairman of JAR-STD 4A WG JAR-FSTD WG Member

  2. Current Status JAR-STD (A)

  3. JAR-STD A Status (cont.) • The 4 Standards for Aeroplane STDs have been developed and refined over the past 15 Years • Therefore the Membership of the JAR STD WG changed • As a Result, much of administrative and regulatory Process Material has become dissimilar

  4. Consequences • CJAA Operations Division Business Plans 2004 and 2005 authorised the Review of the Standards for Synthetic Training Devices • This ensures the Continuation of the Compliance with JAR 11 • The Regulatory Process for STDs shall be updated with the current best Practice

  5. Options • Update and maintain the 4 different Standards • One combined Document with a common Set of Procedures and 4 Sets of parallel technical Standards

  6. Decision NPA-STD 11

  7. Purpose of this NPA JAR-STD 1A JAR-STD 2A JAR-STD 3A JAR-STD 4A JAR FSTD A

  8. Background of JAR FSTD A • The Standards for the Qualification of the Family of Devices remain unchanged: • Flight Simulators (FFS) • Flight Training Devices (FTD) • Flight and Navigation Procedure Trainers (FNPT) • Basic Instrument Training Devices (BITD) • The Base Document is JAR-STD 1A: • Amendment 3 • 1 July 2003

  9. Background of JAR-STD 1A • A combined WG FAA / JAA revised the ICAO Manual of Criteria for the Qualification of Flight Simulators • Further the FAA and JAA Technical Standards for Flight Simulators will be common • The Result was a revised JAR-STD 1A Amendment 3, in Compliance with JAR 11

  10. JAR-STD 1A Amendment 3 • NPA-STD 8 Amendment 3 incorporated… • QTG tests and tolerances as per revised ICAO • Updated functional and subjective tests • Criteria for extending STD qualifications • Level C visual requirements same as Level D • Field Of View and Daylight requirements • Publication date – Tuesday 1st July 2003

  11. FSTD A Details (1) • The Standards for all Families of Devices remain unchanged • CJAA authorised the Review of the STD Standards to ensure Compliance with JAR 11 • Regulatory Process for Qualifying STDs always realigned with the current best Practise

  12. FSTD A Details (2) • The collective Term STD was replaced by FSTD, Flight Simulation Training Device • The Term Flight Simulator was replaced by FFS, Full Flight Simulator • These new Terms were chosen to align with the FAA/JAA revised Terminology

  13. FSTD A Details (3) • Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 combines the Standards for all Types and Levels into one Table • ACJ 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 combines the Objective / Function and Subjective Testing Rquirements for all Types and Levels into two Tables

  14. FSTD A Details (4) • Limited Changes ensure previous Texts from JAR-STD 1A, 2A, 3A and 4A are now unified • In parallel, the Standards for Helicopter STDs are going to be combined in a JAR-FSTD H Document (NPA-STD 12)

  15. Regulatory Impact Assessment • No Impact on Safety • No Impact on Economic • No environmental or social Impacts • A positive Impact on Harmonisation

  16. Consultation (1) • Throughout the Development regular Consultation has taken place between: • Regulatory Specialists • Industry Representatives, including: • Aircraft Manufacturers • Synthetic Training Device Manufacturers • Training Providers • The Draft Version JAR FSTD A was circulated for Comments

  17. Consultation (2) • The Consultation Process resulted in many constructive Comments • As the Changes are mainly of a procedural and administrative Nature .... • .... no dissenting Comments were received

  18. Final Consultation The final Stage of Consultation prior to the Adoption of this NPA will be the JAA Public Comment Process to which the JAA Regulation Sectorial Team will subject the NPA following agreement.

  19. Summary and Final Assessment JAR-STD 1A JAR-STD 2A JAR-STD 3A JAR-STD 4A • No Impact on Costs • Enhanced Clarity through common Standards JAR FSTDA

  20. Thank You for Attention! Any Questions?

More Related