1 / 23

VMS harmonisation in the Netherlands

VMS harmonisation in the Netherlands. Hans Remeijn. VIKING VMS workshop Copenhagen, 16-05-2006. Harmonisation of VMS. Signs; standardisation of sign types Harmonisation of messages Standardisation of Control Systems. Standardisation of Sign types. Motorway (lane control) signs

chassidy
Télécharger la présentation

VMS harmonisation in the Netherlands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VMS harmonisation in the Netherlands Hans Remeijn VIKING VMS workshop Copenhagen, 16-05-2006

  2. Harmonisation of VMS • Signs; standardisation of sign types • Harmonisation of messages • Standardisation of Control Systems

  3. Standardisation of Sign types • Motorway (lane control) signs • DRIPs (Dynamic Route Information Panels) • bermDRIPs (new full matrix panels) • Text carts (VMS on a trailer) • VMS panels on pickup’s • (GRIP = Graphical Route Information Panel)

  4. Standardisation of Sign types Motorway (lane control) signs • All existing signs: fibre optic • Various “generations”, but same layout • Since 2005 new specification for LED signs (using new EN12966) • Fixed set of messages: 50, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, X, , , ,  • First pilots are being done • Cooperation with SNRA on MTM system

  5. Standardisation of Sign types Dynamic Route Information Panels • 1 standard specification • New spec, based on LED and EN12966 • Text only, 3 lines, 10 metres wide • White or Yellow

  6. Standardisation of Sign types BermDRIPs • New signs, based on English MS4 • Graphic, 192x128 pixels, red/white • Combination of pictograms and text • Specification, based on EN12966

  7. Standardisation of Sign types Text carts • No uniform technical specification • Big variety • Often rented • Hardly good/uniform optical requirements • Starting to work on a common specification (using EN 12966 classes)

  8. Standardisation of Sign types VMS panels on pickup’s • New specification, using EN 12966 classes • 2 colours (white and red) • 80 pixels wide, min. 32 high • Hydraulic lift • Horizontal adjustment • Controlled with PDA • Monitoring in TMC

  9. Standardisation of Sign types GRIPs • Prototypes tested end of 2002 • Results promising • No pilot (yet) on the “real road”

  10. Harmonisation of VMS messages Traffic Management Agreements • Prepared by RWS – AVV • Agreed on by all (regional) Traffic Managers • Decided on by Direction team RWS • Then made “public” on RWS intranet site • Mostly guidelines

  11. Harmonisation of VMS messages Dynamic Route Information Panels • Guideline for texts on DRIPs • Two possibilities for Route Information • Traffic situation on the two alternative routes leading to the same point (Intersection name), or • Traffic situation on 2 or 3 not alternative routes • Always mentioning the Range ( to .. ) • Standard as x km Queue, and use of arrows • Use of “via” and Road numbers

  12. Harmonisation of VMS messages Dynamic Route Information Panels

  13. Harmonisation of VMS messages Dynamic Route Information Panels • Experiments with Travel Time (calculation) • Next change: use of pictograms in the text

  14. Harmonisation of VMS messages BermDRIPs • Guideline being prepared (2nd half 2006) • Rules on layout, text and pictograms • Also here: use of small pictograms in the text • First signs on the road: end of June, 2006 • Basis: UK layouts (on road trial: M4)

  15. Harmonisation of VMS messages BermDRIPs; layout ideas in NL

  16. Harmonisation of VMS messages Text carts • Agreed list of texts to be used on text panels • Distributed in the districts • Still lots of “specials”

  17. Harmonisation of VMS messages VMS panels on pickup’s (autoDRIP) • Guideline for texts exits • Change necessary because of change in panel specs (and possibilities)

  18. Harmonisation of VMS messages GRIPs • First use near Amsterdam as a pilot • On the “bermDRIPs” • No guideline yet

  19. Harmonisation of VMS messages Further plans: • Making 1 guideline out of many: • Text strategy for (standard) DRIPs • Display strategy for bermDRIPs • Agreed texts for text carts • Display strategy for pickup signs • Solving problems and handling requests via “editorial group for texts on dynamic panels” • Use of the agreement procedure, ending in publication on intranet

  20. Standardisation of control systems • Now 5 control systems for DRIPs • bermDRIPs will be added to this • Functionally (almost) the same • Systems soon probably the same via “consolidation action” within RWS • From 3  2  1 ? • Slow convergence towards 5 identical systems with the same functionality

  21. But: we still have some exotic signs…

  22. Future …? • In car info will gradually make traffic information on VMS less important • But: warning, control and guidance are getting more important • So: need for newer types of VMS (with graphics) • bermDRIPs are a first step in this direction • Using results from Mare Nostrum

  23. Any Questions ?

More Related