1 / 16

Update: b-jet cross section(s) (w/ Andreas & Greg)

Rob Snihur – McGill University CDF Canada mtg., Sept. 04, 2007. Update: b-jet cross section(s) (w/ Andreas & Greg). Matching Tests Jet pT corrections. Matching Tests. Use matching for Tagging efficiency (requires a ~pure sample of MC b-jets) B-fraction (tagged jets matched to MC b-jets)

cheri
Télécharger la présentation

Update: b-jet cross section(s) (w/ Andreas & Greg)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rob Snihur – McGill University CDF Canada mtg., Sept. 04, 2007 Update: b-jet cross section(s)(w/ Andreas & Greg) Matching Tests Jet pT corrections

  2. Matching Tests • Use matching for • Tagging efficiency (requires a ~pure sample of MC b-jets) • B-fraction (tagged jets matched to MC b-jets) • Absolute pt-jet corrections (cal jets to hadron jets) • Matching details matter! • Metric: use delta-r • Pt ordering • All jets or selected jets • Kinematic cuts • Tag = +-1? • Parton ID = uds, c, b, g • Direction of matching

  3. Cartoons • h CalHad 11 22 3 CalHad 11 22 3 x y x y 3 1 2 2 1 z

  4. Delta R Plots: cal vs had • Top: me (old) • Bottom: Greg (new)

  5. Deriving jet pT corrections • On a jet-by-jet basis, correct the measured pT(cal)  pT(hadron) • Absolute • Relative • Offset (due to UE, MI, etc.) • Must also be consistent with unfolding corrections • Corrects the shape of pT spectrum due to resolution effects • Follow kT, demonstrate 2 methods • Bin in pT of calorimeter jets • Bin in pT(mean) = (pT(cal) + pT(had)) / 2

  6. Absolute jet pT correction • Match cal jets to hadron jets • Plot • pT(had) - pT(cal) • pT(had) / pT(cal) • Versus pT(cal) & pT(mean) • Extract mean y-values and x-values • Plot & fit it

  7. pT(had) in bins of pT(cal) • h

  8. pT(had)-pT(cal) in bins of pT(cal) • h

  9. pT(had)/pT(cal) in bins of pT(cal)

  10. pT(had) in bins of pT(mean)

  11. pT(cal) in bins of pT(mean)

  12. pT(had)-pT(cal) in bins of pT(mean)

  13. pT(had)/pT(cal) in bins of pT(mean)

  14. Immediate next steps • From the previous plots, extact mean values. For the following plots • pT(had)-pT(cal) vs pt(cal) in bins of pT(cal) • pT(had)/pT(cal) vs pt(mean) in bins of pT(mean) • Fit these with a polynomial

  15. Plans and next steps • Analyze new MC • Unfolding correction • Reweighting • To match the data pT spectrum • Theory

  16. Taggable Efficiency? • Only “taggable” jets get a tag value • Taggable def’n: Not only pt and eta/y cuts • See y vs. pt plots of JetClu and SecVtx • Number of tracks?

More Related