1 / 5

CAPM Recap

CAPM Recap. The expected return on an asset is written as E(r i ) = R f + Beta i [E(r m ) – R f ] Beta = Cov (R i , R m ) / Var (R m ) The market is mean-variance efficient An asset’s expected return is related to its level of systematic or non-diversifiable risk as represented by Beta

ciara-conrad
Télécharger la présentation

CAPM Recap

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAPM Recap • The expected return on an asset is written as • E(ri) = Rf + Betai [E(rm) – Rf] • Beta = Cov (Ri, Rm) / Var (Rm) • The market is mean-variance efficient • An asset’s expected return is related to its level of systematic or non-diversifiable risk as represented by Beta • The excess return on an asset over and above that predicted by CAPM is the asset’s Alpha • Over time, an assets alpha is expected to be 0 • e, The non-systematic, firm specific variance is also expected to be 0 over time. Intermediate Investments F303

  2. Critiques and Criticisms of CAPM • Roll’s critique • Identifying the market portfolio • Are the arguments surrounding CAPM really circular in nature? • Roll maintains that CAPM is not testable • Does the existence of Alpha indicate a bad model or market inefficiency? • Recall the example of the Franklin Income Fund, the DJIA and Salomon’s High Grade Bond Index • Was the Franklin Funds under-performing alpha the result of a bad model or market inefficiency? Intermediate Investments F303

  3. Stock Return Anomalies • The small firm effect • Small market cap returns • January effect • The liquidity effect • Amihud and Mendelson argue Beta ineffective in predicting the returns of less liquid assets • Calendar effects • January effect (again!) • Day of the week effect Intermediate Investments F303

  4. Stock Return Anomalies (cont) • The Earnings / Price effect The CAPM debate has gone in three stages: • Support • Critique based on Fama and French • A return to support Intermediate Investments F303

  5. The CAPM Debate • Fama and French • Beta not an effective predictor • Prefer firm size and book to market ratios • Black, Scholes and Jensen • Support for a linear relationship, but there was a permanent existence for alpha • Critique of Fama and French • Errors in methods, sample size and sample periods • A survivorship bias • In the end, beta is still an important factor in predicting returns, it is simply not the only one! Intermediate Investments F303

More Related