1 / 18

Key Questions and Issues in turbulent Transport in Tokamaks

2 nd APTWG at Chengdu, Plenary session, presentation number PL-1. Key Questions and Issues in turbulent Transport in Tokamaks. Some questions along with writing a review on physics behind steady state tokamak research Avalanche dynamics in critical temperature gradient transport

cicily
Télécharger la présentation

Key Questions and Issues in turbulent Transport in Tokamaks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2nd APTWG at Chengdu, Plenary session, presentation number PL-1 Key Questions and Issues in turbulent Transport in Tokamaks • Some questions along with writing a review on physics behind steady state tokamak research • Avalanche dynamics in critical temperature gradient transport • Effect of non-resonant modes, higher order axisymmetric modes on GAM • Termination of ITB through temp curvature (0th order radial force balance) • Mystery of beta dependence of in EM Gyrokinetic , micro tearing? JAEA M. Kikuchi Acknowledgements: P. Diamond, Hahm, Idomura, Miyato, B. Scott, F. Jenko PL-1

  2. [1] Avalanche Dynamics in critical temperature gradient transport Self-organized criticality: power law paradigm P. Bak, Phys. Rev. A38(1988)364 Typical example are, [1] Per Bak’s sand collapse in sand hill [2] Gutenberg-Richter law in Earthquake [3] Solar flare distribution revisited by Shibata Nano flare dN/dE~E-1.75 Shibata told us there is a possibility of super flare with 1000 times of observed largest flare in 1000 years as measured by Kepler satellite. Upper bound of flare was unknown while upper bound of turbulent heat transport is well known, (Krommes Ann Phys. 1987, see Yoshizawa, Itoh, Itoh, IOP, Appendix 14A). Micro flare dN/dE~E-1.53 Largest solar flare Superflare dN/dE~E-1.9 by Kepler Flare energy(Erg) Prof. Shibata Plasma Conf. 2011, to appear Nature

  3. 1.1 Critical temperature gradient transport is now experimentally confirmed for both electron and ion • Electron transport : Hoang PRL2003 • Ion transport :Mantica PRL2011 Mantica PRL2011 Hoang, PRL2003

  4. 1. 2 Streamer and Avalanche Definition of streamer from Yoshizawa-Itoh-Itoh, p278 Convective cell (w~0) Zonal flow : k~(kr,0,0) Streamer : k~(0,kq,0) Third component is k// or kt Note 1: Streamer in toroidal plasma has ballooning character with low k//<<kq but not zero, kt is also not zero Note 2: Streamer in toroidal plasma (ex. ETG streamer simulation by Idomura) do have finite frequency w. His paper says heat transport is caused by quasi-linear effect with finite w. So, there seems no pure “streamer” in toroidal plasma turbulence. Yamada (Nature):The streamer is a poloidally localized, radially elongated global structure (n≤3). Avalanche : radially propagating intermittent flux Idomura NF2005 ETG turbulence simulation

  5. 1.3 Paradigm shift of transport : from random walk to avalanche transport Critical temperature gradient transport Random walk process x Diamond-Hahm, PoP1995 With reference to Hwa’s joint reflection symmetry D 2D mD N! (1/2)N N++N-=N N+-N-=m W= [0.5(N+m)!][0.5(N-m)!] Brokenline: critical temperature P=(4pDt)-1/2exp[-x2/4Dt)] T(r) Starling formula Gauss process void Large dT/dr Step length clump Small dT/dr Large dT/dr r

  6. 1.4 Void : Up-hill avalanche, Bump :Down-hill avalanche T(r) Per Bak,PRL1987 : Self-organized criticality Hwa,PRA1992 : joint reflection symmetry Diamond, Hahm, PoP1995 Large dT/dr Void Bump Small dT/dr Large dT/dr r Idomura Full f Gyrokinetic ES ITG turbulence simulation, NF2009

  7. 1.5 Probability of avalanche • If there is no constraint, probabilities of void and bump are same (symmetric) • Actually, there is asymmetry on probability. • There is a mechanism for symmetry breaking for avalanche propagation distribution.

  8. 1.6 0th order radial force balance holds even in turbulent plasma Idomura Duzi=0 : determined by momentum balance eq. Hole and Bump in P & T -> ?? dEr=(dEr/dr)dr=d(dPi/dr)/eZini – (K1/eZi)ddTi/dr-> dEr/dr~(c1d2Pi/dr2+c2d2Ti/dr2) Er shear is driven by the temperature curvature! Void : d2Ti/dr2 > 0 -> dEr/dr>0 Bump : d2Ti/dr2 < 0 -> dEr/dr<0

  9. 0th order radial force balance equation induces “symmetry breaking”. If background Er’>0, bump is destabilized & hole is stabilized. If background Er’ is negative, hole is destabilized & bump is stabilized.

  10. Key question : Is this explanation correct? JPS meeting : validity of 0th order force balance equation in time scale of fraction of ion-ion collision time . B. Scott : need to check for flat profile (dTi/dr = dTi/dr_c everywhere). Profile is peaked near mid-radius. Key question : What is the role of streamer on avalanche dynamics? Explanation by Idomura : If ITG mode is strongly destabilized somewhere, it will flatten Ti profile. This leads to formation of hole inside and bump outside.

  11. [2] No-resonant mode & higher harmonics axisymmetric modes [1] History of non-resonant mode discussion X. Garbet PoP2002 : Gyro fluid simulation to show intrinsic rotation & ITB formation J. Candy PoP2004 : Importance of non-resonant modes N. Miyato NF2007 : Large mode change by neglecting non-resonant modes Importance of higher harmonic axisymmetric modes Key question : How much we should include non-resonant modes and ax. higher harmonics? 20aTE3

  12. N. Miyato, NF2007 gyro fluid [1] Non-resonant modes can change turbulence, sometimes may produce fake ITB [2] Higher m axisymmetric modes can change GAM through coupling to higher m. With nonresonant modes (n,m)=(0,0), (0,1)—(0,9) Without nonresonant modes (n,m)=0 ,1 With nonresonant modes (n,m)=(0,0), (0,1) All : ri/a=0.005

  13. [3] Termination of ITB through temperature curvature 0th order force balance equation is constraint for turbulence in tokamak. ・[ ] or Positive feedback loop for acceleration of Er shear stabilization through pressure buildup

  14. 3.1 Passing qmin=integer (ex.=4) with steep dP/dr is difficult Y. Sakamoto : NF 2005 (NF top 10) - Avoid disruption when plasma pass qmin=integer. - ITB strength can be controlled by toroidal rotation. Question : How actively control toroidal rotation in reactor Disruption

  15. 3.2 Temperature curvature transition K. Ida, Y. Sakamoto, et al., PRL2008 convex concave

  16. Key question : we should establish control knob for d2T/dr2 Can we actively control direction of intrinsic rotation? -- Diamond paradigm cf. Dueck mechanism for edge IR. Can we actively control NTV offset toroidal rotation? -- may be possible Can local ECH help to control temperature curvature? -- not yet done. Dueck PRL2012

  17. [4] Mystery of beta dependence of in EM Gyrokinetic , micro tearing? Experiments : JT-60 power degradation : Takizuka PPCF2008, Urano NF2006 Gyrokinetics: Pueschel PoP2010 : ITG driven ion heat flux is reduced with beta. Hatch PRL2012: Nonlinear destabilization of stable micro tearing mode enhances electron heat transport. Micro tearing mode has dTe/dr threshold. But Jenko PRL2002 showed dTe_c/dr matches toroidal ETG theory!! Micro tearing mode do not enhance ion transport!! Pueschel PoP2010 Jenko,PRL2002

  18. Summary [1] Critical temperature gradient transport becomes firm basis of tokamak transport. It needs more understanding of detailed physics processes including experimental observation of streamer, relation between streamer and avalanche hole/bump formation and role of 0th order NC relation on hole/bump propagation. [2] Accurate treatment of non-resonant/ high m axisymmetric modes are important for quantitative estimation of GAM/zonal flows. [3] 0th order radial force balance has positive feedback effects on ITB acceleration. Finding control knobs is important. [4] Present gyrokinetic EM simulation is puzzling on beta dependence even including nonlinear destabilization of micro tearing modes.

More Related