1 / 11

Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007)

Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007). Cooling scheme discussion for 300 Tm High Energy Beam Transfer line (HEBT) with large inclination. MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke. Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007). Outline.

cindy
Télécharger la présentation

Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007) Cooling scheme discussion for 300 Tm High Energy Beam Transfer line (HEBT) with large inclination MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke

  2. Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007) Outline • Design constraintsto helium flow in 300 Tm HEBT due to the tunnel with large inclinations; • Simulation results on flow pattern analysis of two-phase helium flow in 300 Tm HEBT as the baseline design in FBTR; • The single phase helium cooling scheme is to be presented together with one of the current feeding concepts; • Conclusions

  3. 300 Tm HEBT layout HERA / UNK type dipole HERA type quadrupole

  4. Constraints given by the inclined tunnel for extraction • One of the major constrains for magnet string design and layout; • Inclination up to 6.6  (11.5%, 115 mrad ) for 300 Tm HEBT from SIS 300 to beam dump and CBM • No such a big slope has ever been considered as constraints in the superconduting magnet baseline design for the existing large machines, e.g., HERA ring (6.3 km) --- 0.5  (1 %, max 10 mrad) LHC ring (27 km) --- 0.8  (1.4 %, 14 mrad) Tevatron (6.0 km), RHIC (3.8 km), Nuclotron (251.5 m) --- nearly horizontal Upper limit for using wheeled-vehicles for magnet installation ---4 % (2.3 , statement from Fermilab, "Design Study for a Staged Very Large Hadron Collider", 2001)

  5. Design constrainsto helium flow in magnet string with large inclinations One-phase and two-phase helium flow arrangement (baseline design in FAIR Baseline Technical Report 2006) One of the design experiences for two-phase helium flow in HERA proton ring: The JT expansion is done at the lowest point of each octant of HERA so that the two-phase flow in HERA magnets is always directed uphill to avoid the capture of bubbles.

  6. Too close to the transition boundary which means high risk of changing into unstable flow pattern We need another concept of cooling scheme! Two-phase helium flow pattern in the inclined part of 300 Tm HEBT from SIS 300 to Beam Dump

  7. Such a study lets people to trace back another study which was done at CERN in earlier 1993 : Studies at CERN in 2006 --- A Possible Upgrade of the LHC Injection Lines (450 GeV) to 900 GeV using HERA Dipoles Injection lines between SPS and LHC are, TI2 (2.9 km with up-hill and down-hill slopes) --- steepest slope is 2.6%; TI8 (2.7 km)--- steepest slope is3.77% One statement of the study, "The lines are characterized by a strong inclination (7.2% max slope) ... The distribution to the magnets of liquid helium in strongly inclined channels and over a distance of several hundred meters represents a considerable cryogenic challenge."

  8. Single phase cooling scheme Alternative two-phase cooling scheme Studies at CERN in 1993 --- Design Criteria of the cryogenic system for the CERN LHC injection lines The authors proposed two cooling schemes for the inclined injection lines: Statements of theStudy at CERN in 1993 : "The single phase cooling scheme adopts a cooling method different from that already operated in HERA. The alternative two-phase cooling scheme offers the possibility of developing a new challenging cooling scheme for SC magnets with two-phase flow over very long distances in strongly inclined channels. However, since it introduces several unknowns and “its feasibility is still doubtful”. Further tests are required before the solution can be seriously pursued." Two single phase streams flow in a thermally insulated pipe inside the existing two channels to prevent possible heat transfer between forward and return streams Only the gaseous stream flows into a pipe thermally insulated from the existing channel

  9. Single phase helium cooling scheme for 300 Tm HEBT

  10. Flow scheme of current feedbox for superconducting links (DFBL) for LHC • If the concept that the current feedboxes are located close to the feeding points of the magnet string (LHC mode) inside the extraction tunnel is not a favourite solution for the power supply requirement at GSI, the recooler has to be integrated in the magnet cryostat design. • No clear picture on this point at GSI up to now because of the uncertainty of cold link design.

  11. Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ 20.09.2007) Conclusions • The numerical simulation shows the baseline of two-phase cooling flow scheme specified in FBTR for the 300 Tm HEBT magnet strings with strong inclinations has high uncertainty. • The single phase cooling scheme which is based on the concept initiated at CERN for LHC injection lines has been presented for the 300 Tm HEBT magnet string. • To start the recooler design, one needs the final decision of current feeding concept.

More Related