350 likes | 497 Vues
Tide Energy Technologies. San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2008. Tidal Dams. Tidal Dam. The dam creates a difference of potential energy between the tide pond and the open sea. Δ z. Power Generation. For the chosen control volume, the system is in steady state, then:.
E N D
Tide EnergyTechnologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2008
Tidal Dam • The dam creates a difference of potential energy between the tide pond and the open sea Δz
Power Generation For the chosen control volume, the system is in steady state, then: • Incompressible fluid:
Power Generation With: τ: tidal period η: Turbine conversion rate AT: Area of the turbine R : Range of the tide Apool: Area of the tidal pool
Basin Management • To optimize power generation the flow gates are kept closed some time after high and low tides
La Rance Tidal Power Plant • Tide mean range: 8.4m • Tide basin area: 22 km2 10 m 9 m 8 m 7m 6m 5m 4m 3m
La Rance Tidal Power Plant • 24 Units of 10 MW each built between 1961 and 1967 • 700 m dam • 480 GWh/y • CF=23%
The Severn Barrage (UK) • Capacity: 8,640 MW, 17 TWh, CF= 23%, Length=15.9 km
The Severn Barrage (UK) • In the Bristol Channel • Range 8.2 m, Basin Area: 480 km2
The Severn Barrage (UK) • Economics
Tidal Streams • There are generated by the difference of water levels
Model Ocean Basin z1 z2 R C z1 has the same period as z2 and a phase-shift Current has the same period as z2 and is in quadrature with z1
Current Power • The power of the current is similar to the power of the wind Available energy is proportional to the cube of the current velocity
The Golden Gate Site • Golden Gate maximum depth = 377 feet
Turbine main components • General concept is similar to wind turbines Gearbox • Increase rotational speed of shaft from turbine • 80-95% efficient Generator and Power Conditioning • Generate electricity • Condition electricity for grid interconnection • Turns at high RPM • 95-98% efficient Rotor • Extracts power from flow • Turns at low RPM 10-30 rpm • Efficiency varies with flow velocity (45% max) Foundation • Secure turbine to seabed • Resist drag on support structure and thrust on rotor Source: Brian Polagye Tidal In-Stream Energy Overview March 6, 2007
Turbines η is the conversion rate of the turbine, typically 25% to 35% • Marine Current Technologies 1 MW, 20m twin rotor prototype currently developed by Marine Current Technologies installed in Northern Ireland’s Strangford Lough (2008) 300 kW, 6 m prototype developed by Marine Current Technologies in operation in the Bristol Channel since 2003
Strangford Lough project • Strangford Lough project
Turbines • Verdant Power 35 kW, 5m Diameter turbine developed by Verdant. Prototype installed in New York at Roosevelt Island (2006 2008). Project of 175 kW
Turbines • Lunar Energy 2 MW, 21m 7 blade rotor prototype currently in development Gravity Foundation: concrete slab Power augmentation by convergent-divergent ducting to increase conversion rate Promising since
Turbines • Clean Current • Pile Mounted • 4 bladed, 14 m, 1 MW • A 65 kW prototype has been Tested at Race Rocks from Sep 2006 to May 2007 Race Rock is a marine reserve run by Lester B.Pearson College on Vancouver Island (Canada)
Turbines • Open Hydro Open Center Rotor Diameter 15 m rated at 1.5 MW Operating Conditions: Current speed > 0.7 m/s Prototype under test at European Marine Energy Center (UK) – Dec. 2006 Source: Bruce H. Adee Tidal Power Technology Update August 9, 2007
Gorlov Different mounting Prototype has been tested at Uldomok Strait in Korea in 2002 1 m diameter and 2.5 m high 1.5 kW
Enemar Kobold Moored – surface mounted 3 vertical articulating blades vertical: 5.0 m diameter: 6 m chord: 0.4 m 25 kW @ 2.0 m/s Prototype has been deployed in Straits of Messina 4 years operational experience
Foundation Technologies Monopile Gravity Base Hollow steel pile driven or drilled into seabed Heavy foundation of concrete and low cost aggregate placed on seabed Pros: • Deep water installation feasible Pros: • Small footprint • Established technology used in offshore wind Cons: • Large footprint • Scour problems for some types of seabed • Decommissioning problems Cons: • High cost in deep water • Installation expensive for some types of seabed (10-40m) Chain Anchors Tension Leg Submerged platform held in place by anchored cables under high tension Chains anchored to seabed and turbine Pros: • Small footprint • Deep water installation feasible Pros: • Small footprint • Deep water installation feasible • Problematic in practice • Device must have high natural buoyancy Cons: Cons: • Immature technology now being considered for offshore wind in deep water Source: Brian Polagye Tidal In-Stream Energy Overview March 6, 2007
Florida Current Resource 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.1 Current speed (knots)
Companies to follow • Blue Energy Canada • Clean Current Technology • Marine Current Turbines • GCK (Gorlov) • Lunar Energy • Open Hydro • Enemar Kobold • Verdant Power • Seapower • Tidal Electric • Aquantis Annapolis Tidal Generating Station (USA)