1 / 90

Pediatric Ankle & Foot Fractures

Pediatric Ankle & Foot Fractures. Steven Frick, MD Original Authors: Laura Phieffer, MD and Steven Frick, MD; March 2004 New Author: Steven Frick, MD; Revised August 2006. Pediatric Ankle Fractures. 2nd most common site of physeal fractures in children Most occur between ages 10 - 15 y.o.

colm
Télécharger la présentation

Pediatric Ankle & Foot Fractures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pediatric Ankle & Foot Fractures Steven Frick, MD Original Authors: Laura Phieffer, MD and Steven Frick, MD; March 2004 New Author: Steven Frick, MD; Revised August 2006

  2. Pediatric Ankle Fractures • 2nd most common site of physeal fractures in children • Most occur between ages 10 - 15 y.o. • boys > girls • direct and indirect mechanisms

  3. Ankle Anatomy • all ligamentous structures attach distal to the physis • ligaments are stronger than physis • physeal injury more common

  4. Ankle Anatomy • distal tibial ossification center appears between 6 - 24 months • distal fibular ossification center appears between 9 - 24 months • medial malleolar extension begins ~ 7 y.o. completes ~ 10 y.o.

  5. Physeal Closure • distal tibial physis closes ~15 y.o. girls ~17 y.o. boys • asymmetric closure over ~18 months • closure distal fibular physis follows distal tibial physeal closure by ~12-24 months

  6. Distal Tibial Physeal Closure

  7. Age / Fracture Pattern • Spiegel et al JBJS 1978

  8. Classification - Ankle Fractures • Anatomic: Salter-Harris • high interobserver correlation • correlated with outcomes

  9. Classification - Ankle Fractures • Mechanism of injury: Dias and Tachdjian

  10. Diagnosis - Ankle Fractures • direct/indirect mechanisms • acute/subacute • subtle exam findings • Differentiate sprain from nondisplaced fracture by location of tenderness

  11. Diagnosis - Ankle Fractures • Radiographs - AP, LAT, Mortise • know normal anatomic variants • Stress radiographs • CT scan – to assess articular involvement • MRI – role not yet well defined in acute injuries

  12. Accessory Ossification Centers – Smooth Borders

  13. Treatment Considerations • Location of fracture • Mechanism of injury • Degree of displacement • Age of child (how much growth remains)

  14. Salter-Harris Type I fxs • Typically occurs in younger pts • seen with all mechanisms (SI, SPF, SER, PEER) • Often missed initially (dx “sprain”) • Xrays – acute – often normal except for soft tissue swelling over physis • Xrays- subacute - reveal widening of physis- healing

  15. Salter-Harris Type II fxs • most common distal tibia fx type • seen with all mechanisms (SI, SPF, SER, PEER) • mechanism deduced by direction of dist tibial epiphysis, type assoc fib fx, location of metaphyseal spike

  16. Salter II Distal Tibia Fracture

  17. Salter-Harris Type I & II fxs • non-displaced fxs • LLC x 3-4 wks => SLWC x 3wks (SH I fxs can be treated with SLWC x 3-4wks) • displaced fxs • Avoid repeated attempts at CR • LLC x 3wks => SLC x 3wks => SLWC • Open reduction infrequently indicated • Follow for growth arrest

  18. Healed Distal Tibial Physeal Fracture -2 things make physes wider - healing fractures and rickets

  19. Salter-Harris Type I & II fxs • If CR is incomplete, how much residual displacement is acceptable? • Caruthers and Crenshaw AJS 1955 • “accurate reposition of the displaced epiphysis at the expense of forced or repeated manipulation or operative intervention is not indicated”

  20. Salter-Harris Type I & II fxs • If CR is incomplete, how much residual displacement is acceptable? • Spiegel et al JBJS 1978 • correlated SH classification with risk of shortening, angular deformity and joint incongruity • recommend “precise anatomical reduction”

  21. Salter-Harris Type I & II fxs • Differing opinions regarding indication for open reduction for interposition of periosteum => widening with minimal angulation • Kling et al 1984 • Phieffer, Wattenbarger et al 2000- animal model • Mubarak et al 2005 believe interposed periosteum leads to growth disturbance

  22. Closed reduction with incomplete reduction because of interposed soft tissues – removed at ORIF

  23. Salter-Harris Type I & II fxs • displaced subacute (>7-10 days out) fxs • Residual displacement probably best accepted • If growth does not sufficiently correct malunion, corrective osteotomy performed

  24. Salter-Harris Type III & IV fxs • Mechanism of injury similar for both fx patterns (typically supination-inversion) • Usually produced by medial corner of talus being driven into the junction of distal tibial articular surface and the medial malleolus • Can see central and lateral fx patterns

  25. Kling et.al., JBJS ‘84 • 33 fractures of the distal tibial physis • Most SH types III and IV • 19 tx with ORIF • 9 treated with closed methods • 0 bone bridges in ORIF group • 5 of 9 closed tx formed physeal bars • Recommended anatomic reduction of physis

  26. Salter-Harris Type III & IV fxs • Treatment and prognosis are similar • Medial pattern appears to be at higher risk for developing partial growth arrest => varus deformity • Spiegel et al JBJS 1978 • Kling et al JBJS 1984 • Caterini et al Foot & Ankle 1991

  27. Salter-Harris Type III & IV fxs • non-displaced fxs (<1 mm) • LLC x 3-4 wks => SLWC x 3wks • CT after cast placement to assess displacement • Weekly xrays in cast for first 3 weeks to assure no displacement • Percutaneous fixation also option • Follow for growth arrest

  28. Salter III Injury- CRIF

  29. Salter-Harris Type III & IV fxs • displaced fxs (>2 mm) • Anatomical reduction • CR under GA if continued > 2 mm displacement => open reduction • Open reduction, epiphyseal fixation parallel to growth plate if much growth remaining • Postop LLC x 3-4 wks => SLWC x 3wks

  30. Salter IV Distal Tibia Fracture Fixation avoids physis

  31. Salter-Harris Type III & IV fxs • subacute displaced fxs • Accept up to 2 mm displacement • >2mm displacement => recommend reduction regardless of time from injury with debridement and interposition graft if necessary (goal to restore joint congruity)

  32. Delayed diagnosis Salter IV medial malleolus fracture in 6 yo multitrauma patient • initial radiographs 15 days out from injury

  33. Anterior Approach • ORIF 16 days after injury

  34. Note growth slowdown line parallels physis and increased distance between markers – normal growth • nine months post-operative

  35. Salter-Harris Type V fxs • Crush injury to physis • No associated displacement • Diagnosis made with follow-up xrays revealing premature physeal closure • treatment directed primarily at sequelae of growth arrest

  36. High Energy Injuries to Distal Tibia • Uncommon • Severe injury to distal tibial articular surface – poor prognosis • Restore articular surface if possible • Length and alignment – bridging external fixation can be helpful

  37. High energy distal tibia fracture/subluxation in 11 year old female in MVC

  38. C T scan demonstrates significantly comminuted articular surface and anterior subluxation of talus

  39. Intraop views – bridging external fixation and ORIF with pin fixation

  40. One Year Follow Up

  41. 12 Year Old – High Velocity GSW – loss of tibial epiphysis/anterior soft tissues/tendons - bridging ex fix-latissimus free flap – ankle fusion

  42. “Transitional” Fractures • fxs occurring during asymmetric closure of distal tibial physis • Triplane fx • 2,3 or 4-part fxs • lateral more common • Juvenile Tillaux fx

  43. “Transitional” Fractures • Triplane fx • tend to be seen in younger pts than pts with Juvenile Tillaux fx • more displacement/swelling more severe • Treatment decisions usually based on articular displacement

  44. “Transitional” Fractures • Triplane fx - results • overall results are good following adequate reduction • VonLaer JBJS 1985 • Clement and Warlock JBJS 1987 • good early results • Erlt et al JBJS 1988 • decline in results over time

  45. “Transitional” Fractures • non-displaced Triplane fxs • LLC, knee flexed 30, foot IR x3wks => SLWC x3-4wks • CT after cast placement to assure no displacement • Weekly xrays in cast for first 3 weeks to assure no displacement in cast • FU xrays obtained every 6 months for 2 to 3 yrs

  46. “Transitional” Fractures • displaced fxs Triplane (>2 mm) • Anatomical reduction • CR achieved => LLC, 30KF, foot IR • CR unsuccessful => OR • Reduction/internal fixation done in step-wise fashion with small frag or 4.0 cannulated screws • Postop - SLC x 3-4wks => SLWC x 3wks

  47. “Transitional” Fractures • Juvenile Tillaux fxs • tend to be older than pts with triplane fx • Fibula prevents marked displacement/swelling may be subtle • Local tenderness at ant-lat joint line • Mortise view essential • Although literature based on small pt series, excellent results with anatomic reduction noted

  48. “Transitional” Fractures • non-displaced Tillaux fxs • LLC, knee flexed 30, foot IR x3wks => SLWC x3-4wks • CT scan after cast placement to assure no displacement • Weekly radiographs in cast for first 3 weeks to assure no displacement in cast • FU xrays obtained every 6 months for 2 to 3 yrs

  49. “Transitional” Fractures • displaced (>2mm) Tillaux fxs • Anatomical reduction • CR achieved => LLC, 30KF, foot IR • CR unsuccessful => OR for CR, unsuccessful => k-wires to joystick Tillaux fragment (percutaneously or open) • Fixation with small frag or 4.0 cannulated screw, can cross physis • Postop - SLC x3-4wks => SLWC x3wks

  50. Juvenile Tilleaux Fracture-ORIF

More Related