1 / 12

PA 512 Capstone Case Analysis

PA 512 Capstone Case Analysis. City of Washougal Effective Utility Management Assessment By Trevor Evers Public Works Director for the City of Washougal Presented to: PSU Faculty and EMPA Cohort, June 15, 2013. Problem Statement.

conner
Télécharger la présentation

PA 512 Capstone Case Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PA512 Capstone Case Analysis City of Washougal Effective Utility Management Assessment By Trevor Evers Public Works Director for the City of Washougal Presented to: PSU Faculty and EMPA Cohort, June 15, 2013

  2. Problem Statement • Washougal has a utility rate issue and a significant misalignment between management and utility staffpriorities • Public-Private-Partnership initiative further strained an already contentious relationship between management & utility staff • Escalating utility rates have put additional pressure on efficiency & effectiveness of utility programs

  3. Literature Review/Pre-Research Findings (two groups of information): • Case study analysis provided by effective utility management consortium (EUM)www.watereum.org • Priority alignment research instrument (primer survey) • Association of Washington Cities (AWC) 2012 Trends Report; Municipal Landscape Critical Shifts • Critical review of utility rate report and PPP feasibility report provided to Washougal • Utility rate analysis report from FCS Group (2010) • Efficiency recommendations by PPP consultant (SAIC)

  4. Purpose & Significance of Research • Main objective of this research study: • Prepare a recommended plan of action to address escalating utility rates and align utility management and staff on priorities after recently failed initiatives • The significance of the report: • Is to identify a long term strategy to address utility rates and identify immediate efficiency improvements within the operation and maintenance of the utilities

  5. Research Questions • What are the current conditions of the 10 attributes ranked by utility staff, management, and utility billing staff? • How do department employees rank the importance of each of the 10 attributes identified in the consortium effort? • How well does the existing management structures and processes support the core attributes assessed by utility department staff

  6. Research Methods • Used primary and secondary research • Primary – 9 staff memberscompleted a primer survey to prioritize utility attributes • Secondary – Literature Review of AWC, FCS Group utility report, SAIC public-private-partnership feasibility report • Purposely selected utility attributes that are high priority to survey participants, but not meeting achievement expectations • Averaged scores of participants equally (not weighted)

  7. Research Findings – “The Yellow Box”Water Utility Attribute Overall Ranking Financial Viability (FV) Infrastructure Stability (IS)

  8. Research Findings – “The Yellow Box”Wastewater Utility Attribute Overall Ranking Stakeholder Under standing & Support (SS) Infrastructure Stability (IS) Financial Viability (FV)

  9. Recommended Action Plan Step 1: Develop Cost-of-Service scope of work for advertisement (FV) Step 2: Develop business case for technoloy upgrades to enhance efficiencies within utility operations (IS) Step 3: Scour utility service programs to identify additional efficiency opportunites(IS)

  10. Recommended Action Plan Step 4: Develop civic engagement campaign to further inform the community of utility rate initiatives (SS) Step 5: Critical review of organizational chart in utilities, redeployment options to enhance efficiency and stability (IS) Step 6: Link action plan initiatives to recently adopted strategic plan priority pillars (SS,IS,FV)

  11. Conclusion • All six steps need to be considered in a phased approach to address the utility attributes identified by staff as important but not meeting agency expectations • The primer survey should be revisited to identify attributes that are misaligned between customers, electeds, and utility staff. • PSU’s EMPA program preparation to lead • Long Term Solutions, short term strategies

  12. Acknowledgements A huge thank you to: • My advisor, Professor Morgan and all of the EMPA program Professors, staff and volunteers • Cohort team members, especially Ted Ebora • My family, especially my wife, Jody and two boys Oliver and Samuel • My supervisor, David Scott and Mayor Sean Guard • The City of Washougal

More Related