1 / 12

Innovative Roller Coaster Design: From Concept to Final Testing

This report details the comprehensive design process of a revolutionary roller coaster by the Roller Coaster Design Group, featuring key members James Tomashot, Alex Styborski, Roberto Samaniego, and Peter Schaaf. The design includes exciting features such as double vertical loops, upward and downward horizontals, and bumps. We outline the brainstorming phases, initial and final design calculations, and testing results, achieving an impressive score of 103/100. Challenges like speed loss and horizontal loops were addressed, ensuring a thrilling ride experience.

conroy
Télécharger la présentation

Innovative Roller Coaster Design: From Concept to Final Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Roller Coaster Design Group C: James Tomashot, Alex Styborski, Roberto Samaniego, Peter Schaaf

  2. Overview • Brainstorming ideas • Initial paper design • Final design • Final test • Design problems and solutions

  3. Brainstorming ideas • Double vertical loop • Upward horizontal that went through the double vertical loop • Downward horizontal • Bump • Straight away

  4. Initial design feature list • Double vertical loop • Double horizontal downward • Turn in each direction • Bump • Straight Away • These features were all kept for the final design

  5. Final design feature list • Double vertical loop • Double horizontal loop • Turns in both directions • Bump • Two straight away

  6. Initial paper design calculations • (Insert table from IPD)

  7. Initial paper design other calculations • Minimum velocity at the top of vertical loop #1: V = (gr)1/2 = (9.8*0.06m)1/2 = 0.7668 (m/s) • Actual velocity at the top of vertical loop #1: 2.1445 (m/s) • Minimum velocity at the top of vertical loop #2: V = (gr)1/2= (9.8*0.06m)1/2 = 0.7668 (m/s) • Actual velocity at the top of vertical loop #2: 1.138 (m/s) • Maximum velocity over the bump so no separation with track occurs: V = (gr)1/2 = (9.8*0.0508m)1/2

  8. Final design calculations • (Insert table: in progress)

  9. Final design other calculations • (in progress)

  10. Final test • We received a 103/100 • All three test runs • The last two yielded the same results

  11. Design Problems • Losing to much speed • Horizontal loops

  12. Summary

More Related