1 / 43

Condensation in mini- and microchannels

Condensation in mini- and microchannels. Hussein Dhanani Sebastian Schmidt Christian Metzger Assistant: Marcel Christians-Lupi Teacher: Prof. J.R Thome. 20 December 2007. Structure. Introduction to condensation in microchannels Pressure drop Prediction models Friedel (1979;1980)

constance-morse
Télécharger la présentation

Condensation in mini- and microchannels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Condensation in mini- and microchannels Hussein Dhanani Sebastian Schmidt Christian Metzger Assistant: Marcel Christians-Lupi Teacher: Prof. J.R Thome 20 December 2007 Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  2. Structure • Introduction to condensation in microchannels • Pressure drop • Prediction models • Friedel (1979;1980) • Chen (2001) • Cavallini (2001;2002) • Wilson (2003) • Garimella (2005) • Graph analysis Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  3. Structure • Heat transfer • Prediction models • Shah (1979) • Dobson & Chato (1998) • Cavallini (2002) • Bandhauer (2005) • Graph analysis • Questions Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  4. Introduction • Condensation inside horizontal microchannels • Automotive air-conditioning, petrochemical industry • Reduce use of ozone-killing fluids • Increase heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop • Surface tension + Viscosity>>> gravitational forces Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 4

  5. Pressure drop • Common parameters used by several correlations • Liquid Reynolds number • Vapor Reynolds number • Liquid-only Reynolds number • Vapor-only Reynolds number Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  6. Pressure drop • Common parameters used by several correlations • Single-phase friction factor (smooth tube) • Single-phase pressure gradients Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  7. Pressure drop prediction models • Friedel (1979;1980) • Considered Parameters • Liquid only single-phase pressure gradient • Liquid only and vapor only friction factor • Fluid and geometric properties • Range / applicability • D > 1 mm • Adiabatic • μl/μv < 1000 Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  8. Pressure drop prediction models • Friedel (1979;1980) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  9. Pressure drop prediction models • Chen et al. (2001) • Modification of the Friedel correlation by adding two-phase multiplier • Considered Parameters • Two-phase pressure gradient by Friedel • We, Bo, Rev, Relo • Range / applicability • 3.17 < D < 9 mm for R-410A • 5°C < Tsat < 15°C • 50 < G < 600 kg/m2s Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  10. Pressure drop prediction models • Chen et al. (2001) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  11. Pressure drop prediction models • Cavallini et al. (2002) • Modification of the Friedel correlaction for annular flow. • Considered Parameters • Liquid only single-phase pressure gradient • Liquid only and vapor only friction factor • Fluid and geometric properties • Range / applicability • D = 8 mm for R-134a , R-410a and others • 30°C < Tsat < 50°C • 100 < G < 750kg/m2s Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  12. Pressure drop prediction models • Cavallini et al. (2002) Friedel Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  13. Pressure drop prediction models • Cavallini et al. (2002) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory

  14. Pressure drop prediction models • Wilson et al. (2003) • Considered parameters • Single-phase pressure gradients (liquid-only) • Martinelli parameter • Range / applicabilty • Flattened round smooth, axial, and helical microfin tubes. • 1.84 < D < 7.79 mm for R-134a, R-410A • Tsat = 35°C • 75 < G < 400 kg/m2s Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 14

  15. Pressure drop prediction models Model uses liquid-only two-phase multiplier of Jung and Radermacher (1989): Xtt is the Martinelli dimensionless parameter for turbulent flow in the gas and liquid phases. Insert formulation • Wilson et al. (2003) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 15

  16. Pressure drop prediction models Knowing the single-phase pressure gradient, the two-phase pressure grandient is: with Single-phase friction factors are calculated using the Churchill correlation (1977): • Wilson et al. (2003) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 16

  17. Pressure drop prediction models • Garimella et al. (2005) • Considered parameters • Single-phase pressure gradients • Martinelli parameter • Surface tension parameter • Fluid and geometric properties • Range / applicabilty • 0.5 < D < 4.91 mm for R-134a • Tsat ~ 52°C • 150 < G < 750 kg/m2s Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 17

  18. Pressure drop prediction models Void fraction is calculated using the Baroczy (1965) correlation: Liquid and vapor Re values are given by: • Garimella et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 18

  19. Pressure drop prediction models Liquid and vapor friction factors: Therefore, the single-phase pressure gradients are given and the Martinelli parameter is calculated: • Garimella et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 19

  20. Pressure drop prediction models Liquid superficial velocity is given by: This velocity is used to evaluate the surface tension parameter: • Garimella et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 20

  21. Pressure drop prediction models Interfacial friction factor: Laminar region: Turbulent region (Blasius): • Garimella et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 21

  22. Pressure drop prediction models The pressure gradient is determined as follows: • Garimella et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 22

  23. Pressure drop prediction models G = 400 kg/m2s G = 800 kg/m2s Tsat = 40°C , D = 1.4 mm • Graph analysis for R-134a Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 23

  24. Pressure drop prediction models G = 600 kg/m2s G = 1000 kg/m2s Tsat = 40°C , D = 1.4 mm • Graph analysis for R-410A Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 24

  25. Heat transfer • Common parameters used by several correlations • Prandtl number • Reduced pressure • Martinelli parameter Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 25

  26. Heat transfer prediction models • Shah (1979) • Considered parameters • Vapor Velocity • Liquid-only Reynolds number • Liquid Prandtl number • Reduced pressure • Fluid and geometric properties • Range / applicability • 7 < D < 40 mm • Various refrigerants • 11 < G < 211 kg/m2s • 21 < Tsat < 310°C Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 26

  27. Heat transfer prediction models Applicability range: If range is respected, compute liquid-only transfer coefficient: • Shah (1979) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 27

  28. Heat transfer prediction models For heat transfer coefficient, apply multiplier: Widely used for design. Improvement needed for results near critical pressure and vapor quality from 0.85 to 1. • Shah (1979) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 28

  29. Heat transfer prediction models • Dobson and Chato (1998) • Considered parameters • Liquid, vapor-only Reynolds number • Martinelli parameter • Zivi’s (1964) void fraction • Galileo number • Modified Soliman Froude number • Liquid Prandtl number • Range / applicability • D = 7.04 mm • 25 < G < 800 kg /m2s • 35 < Tsat < 60°C Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 29

  30. Heat transfer prediction models Calculate the modified Soliman Froude number: • Dobson and Chato (1998) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 30

  31. Heat transfer prediction models With: • Dobson and Chato (1998) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 31

  32. Heat transfer prediction models For Frso > 20, the annular flow correlation proposed is And the resulting heat transfer coefficient is: • Dobson and Chato (1998) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 32

  33. Heat transfer prediction models • Cavallini et al. (2002) Applicable for annular regime only • Considered Parameters • Pressure drop • Dimensionless film thickness • Dimensionless temperature • Re, Pr • Fluid and geometric properties • Range / applicability • D = 8 mm • R134a and R410a • 100 < G < 750 kg/m2s • 30 < Tsat < 50°C Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 33

  34. Heat transfer prediction models • Calculation of the shear stress • Dimensionless film thickness Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 34

  35. Heat transfer prediction models • Heat transfer coefficient Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory • Dimensionless temperature 35

  36. Heat transfer prediction models • Bandhauer et al. (2005) • Considered parameters • Pressure drop • Dimensionless film thickness • Turbulent dimensionless temperature • Pr • Fluid and geometric properties • Range / applicability • 0.4 < D < 4.9 mm • R134a • 150 < G < 750 kg/m2s Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 36

  37. Heat transfer prediction models Interfacial shear stress: Friction velocity is now calculated: • Bandhauer et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 37

  38. Heat transfer prediction models Film thickness is directly calculated from void fraction: This thickness is used to obtain the dimensionless film thickness: • Bandhauer et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 38

  39. Heat transfer prediction models Turbulent dimensionless temperature is given by: Therefore, the heat transfer coefficient is: • Bandhauer et al. (2005) Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 39

  40. Heat transfer G=175 kg/m2s G=400 kg/m2s D=2.75mm, Tsat=35°C Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory • Graph analysis for R134a 40

  41. Heat transfer G=175 kg/m2s G=400 kg/m2s D=2.75mm, Tsat=35°C Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory • Graph analysis for R410a 41

  42. Questions ?

  43. Thank you for your (hard) attention !

More Related