1 / 3

Mapping of blobs/filaments from miplane to divertor target

Proposed by J.L. Terry, B. LaBombard , I. Cziegler , S. Zweben , and O. Grulke. How do SOL filaments map onto divertor targets? Are filaments sheared apart as they pass near the X-pt (Cohen,Ryutov 1 )?

corin
Télécharger la présentation

Mapping of blobs/filaments from miplane to divertor target

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposed by J.L. Terry, B. LaBombard, I. Cziegler, S. Zweben, and O. Grulke • How do SOL filaments map onto divertor targets? • Are filaments sheared apart as they pass near the X-pt (Cohen,Ryutov1)? • Does the current carried by the filament perturb the field locally so as to move the filament out radially at the target (Krashenninikov2)? Mapping of blobs/filaments from miplane to divertor target Background: Motivation: • Maqueda, et al.3 show NSTX filaments reaching the targets for rfil>rcrit. • Existing C-Mod data show strong cross-correlation between miplane GPI and target probes (F-port floor), as well as between GPI and FSP. • However, this occurs with a EFIT mapping that that deviates from actual geometry (Dr~7 mm & Dz ~ 6 cm) 1 Cohen & Ryutov NF 37 (1997) p 621. 2 private communication 3Maqueda, et al., NF 50 (2010) p 75002. C-Mod Ideas Forum: Jan. 10-12, 2011

  2. Mapping of blobs/filaments from miplane to divertor target These are low q (q95=3.1)configurations However, these peak correlations/mappings are for mappings that differ from those predicted by EFIT, i.e. Bt=0.925 BtEFIT and midpl view of max corr. maps to an R< the actual R of the probe! C-Mod Ideas Forum: Jan. 10-12, 2011

  3. To date we have only successfully mapped probes above the nose to the 2D GPI view, thus run shots which map those F divertor probes that are closer to the strike pt into the GPI view. Observe at what r’s correlation is observed. • The mapping occurs at q95~3.1. Previous observation was at Bt=3.62T. Scan Bt and Ip, keeping q fixed to see if observed mismatch in r scales with Bp, as it should if the filaments currents are perturbing the local field. • Measure the distribution of time lags • for maximum correlation to see if the • filaments propagate from midplane to • divertor or are born along outboard flux • tubes at the same time (i.e. k||=0). Mapping of blobs/filaments from miplane to divertor target Plan: preliminary: ~3ms lag between GPI & FSP 1 dedicated run is needed. C-Mod Ideas Forum: Jan. 10-12, 2011

More Related