1 / 0

T he New Comprehensive Teacher and Principal Evaluation Law

T he New Comprehensive Teacher and Principal Evaluation Law. September 22, 2010. Timeline. APPR. Current categories include: Content Knowledge Pedagogical Practices Instructional delivery Classroom Management Knowledge of student development Use of assessment techniques/data

cormac
Télécharger la présentation

T he New Comprehensive Teacher and Principal Evaluation Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The New Comprehensive Teacher and Principal Evaluation Law

    September 22, 2010
  2. Timeline
  3. APPR Current categories include: Content Knowledge Pedagogical Practices Instructional delivery Classroom Management Knowledge of student development Use of assessment techniques/data Effective collaborative relationships Reflection of teaching practices
  4. APPR Changes Adds Student Growth Category The student growth category will be weighted 40% of the final evaluation. 20% to be based on student growth 20% to be based on locally agreed to criteria The weighting of the remaining eight categories will be locally determined, total to = 100 points 2013-2014 planned adoption of value added-growth model.
  5. APPR Changes Establishes four rating categories: Highly effective Effective Developing Ineffective Rating to be determined by 100 point scale- scale breakdown yet to be determined.
  6. Value - Added Model Uses pre-test/post-test model to determine growth for the given timeframe Subtracts the typical growth shown for that timeframe Difference is the “Value – Added” attributable to a particular teacher Ex. (660 scale score on grade 3 exam – 680 on grade 4) – (10pt. average growth) = 10 pts.
  7. Value – Added Shortcomings Must be alignment between pre-test and post test
  8. Value – Added Shortcomings Horizontal scale should be more linear.
  9. Sample Value – Added Calculation
  10. Sample Value – Added Calculation
  11. Sample Value – Added Calculation Teacher Average District Average Value Added
  12. Sample Value – Added Calculation Teacher Average District Average Value Added
  13. Sample Value – Added Calculation School A School B Building comparison for principal evaluations
  14. Next Steps Negotiate the “locally selected criteria” Triangulate assessments to yield a balanced score Establish weighting of remaining categories Establish appeal process Formalize mandatory educator improvement plan process (cost of professional development)
More Related