1 / 23

Interactions and Zonation in Marine Ecology: Physical Factors vs Biological Interactions

Explore the role of physical and chemical factors versus biological interactions in zonation patterns in marine ecosystems. Learn about competition for space, predator-prey interactions, symbiotic relationships, larval ecology, and the effects of disturbance on succession.

crystalcash
Télécharger la présentation

Interactions and Zonation in Marine Ecology: Physical Factors vs Biological Interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Marine Ecology May 9 & 12, 2008 Between the tides: Interactions 1

  2. Zonation: Role of physical/chemical factors vs. biological interactions • Joe Connell, 1972: Hypothesis • Physical factors primarily responsible for upper limits • Biological interactions primarily responsible for lower limits • Support for hypothesis?

  3. Effects of biotic factors on zonation/distribution in intertidal • Competition for space • Predator-prey interactions • Role of grazers • Symbiotic relationships and species distribution • Larval ecology • Disturbance (abiotic)  succession (biotic)

  4. Competition for space • Example: Vertical distribution of the intertidal barnacles ChthamalusBalanus/Semibalanus

  5. Barnacle zonation (after Connell, 1961)

  6. Barnacle zonation in New England

  7. Competition for space • Example: Algal distribution • Species with small body forms initially settle and grow (opportunistic) • Slower-growing, larger forms outcompete if no disturbance occurs

  8. Competition for space • Example: Lottia gigantea (owl limpet) territoriality

  9. Competition for space • Example: Mussel bed succession

  10. Example: Nucella sp. Predatory snail Excretes enzymes with an accessory boring organ to dissolve test of barnacles Has operculum: enables it to retreat into shell at low tide Predator-prey interactions

  11. Example: Pisaster ochraceus and the mussel Mytilus californianus Bob Paine’s Caging experiments Follow-up (14-17 yrs) Comparisons to Chile and New Zealand studies Predator-prey interactions

  12. Bob Paine’s experiments:Effects of Pisaster removal Castro and Huber, Fig. 11.22

  13. Bob Paine’s experiments:Effects of Pisaster removal • What happened when he returned to his study site 14-17 years after cages were removed? • How do Bob Paine’s results compare to similar studies in New Zealand and Chili?

  14. Fig. 6.18: Pisaster ochraceus as a Keystone species

  15. Fig. 6.19: Natural experiments on New England coast (Menge and Lubchenco)

  16. Predator-prey interactions • Distribution within a zone • Oystercatchers affect limpet distribution Black oystercatcher (Pacific) Variable oystercatcher (New Zealand)

  17. Role of grazers • Limitation of algae by grazers • Overview • Case study: Katharina tunicata

  18. Role of grazers • Maintenance of diversity by grazers • Example: Effects of snails on algal diversity in a tidepool.

  19. Complex interactions

  20. Role of grazers • Grazing deterrents • Morphological • Chemical defenses • Crustose vs. erect forms • Size refuges • Limitation of grazers by algae

  21. Symbiotic relationships • Commensal: One species may create suitable habitat for another • Example: Mussel beds

  22. Marine BiologyMay 9, 2007 Between the tides: Interactions 2 Larval ecology and disturbance

  23. Symbiotic relationships • Mutualistic relationships • Example: Anthopleura spp.

More Related