1 / 15

Spin-boost vs. Lorentz Transformations Application to area invariance of Black Hole horizons

Spin-boost vs. Lorentz Transformations Application to area invariance of Black Hole horizons. Sarp Akcay. Foreword. Area invariance of a black hole’s (BH) 2-dim. Apparent horizon (AH) under Lorentz trans. is well known. But hard to show explicitly.

cybele
Télécharger la présentation

Spin-boost vs. Lorentz Transformations Application to area invariance of Black Hole horizons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spin-boost vs. Lorentz TransformationsApplication to area invariance of Black Hole horizons Sarp Akcay UT Relativity Seminar

  2. Foreword • Area invariance of a black hole’s (BH) 2-dim. Apparent horizon (AH) under Lorentz trans. is well known. • But hard to show explicitly. • Usual derivation is based on spin-boost transformations. • It turns out that spin-boost trans. do not always yield meaningful trans. on a BH spacetime. Meaning: not all spin-boosts are physical boosts. • Spin-boost derivation is not a reliable way to show AH area invariance under Lorentz boosts. UT Relativity Seminar

  3. How we shall proceed • Area invariance: The area of Black Hole’s (BH) apparent horizon (AH) is invariant under Lorentz transformations. • Tetrad formalism: a basis of 4 lin. indep. vectors → a tetrad → null tetrad • Special transformation: Null rotation of a null tetrad looks like a Lorentz boost, called a Spin-Boost transformation (type III rotation). • AH geometry (metric) remains invariant under spin-boost transformations. (→ area invariance) • Spin-boost is not really a Lorentz boost? (Poisson). UT Relativity Seminar

  4. Area Invariance of AH • BH event horizon (EH) is a 3-dim. null surface in spacetime. (see fig.1) • AH is a 2-dim. cross section of EH at a t = constant slice. Any t will do, S2 topology. • Area of AH is invariant under Lorentz transformations. • Null directions do not contribute to the area. (see fig. 2) UT Relativity Seminar

  5. Area Invariance of AH contd. • Explicitly shown in gr-qc:0708.0276 for Kerr BH w/ arbitrary boost. • Area = ∫(det hAB)1/2 = 4π(r+2 + a2)+ ∫ sinφ dφ • Same answer as unboosted Kerr BH. UT Relativity Seminar

  6. Usual derivation for Area Invariance • Let ℓα be a geodesic tangent to EH, λbe the affine parameter for ℓα i.e. ℓβ∂βℓα = ∂ℓα/∂λ • Lorentz transformations change the parametrization of the null vector: • 2-metric → where and • eαAgets a null contribution under the transformation • Therefore hAB remains invariant i.e. 2-metric is invariant. UT Relativity Seminar

  7. Questions? • Why did gαβ remain invariant? (no bars?) • Under a type III rotation (spin-boost), gαβ remains invariant • Given a null tetrad eµ(a) = (ℓµ, nµ, mµ, mµ*) for a spacetime: e(a)2 = 0 and ℓ∙n = -1, m∙m* = 1 (by choice) • The metric is given by gαβ = - ℓαnβ – nα ℓβ + mαmβ* + mα*mβ • A type III rotation on the tetrad is as follows: ℓµ→ A-1ℓµ , nµ → Anµ, mµ → eiθmµ, mµ* → e-iθmµ* Metric is invariant under type III rotation UT Relativity Seminar

  8. Questions • Why a type III rotation? • It looks like a Lorentz boost • Construct unit timelike Tµ = (ℓµ + nµ)/ √2 unit spacelike sµ = (ℓµ - nµ)/ √2 • Type III rotation transforms these • Letting v/c ≡β = (A2 – 1)/ (A2 + 1) we get Boost along sµ UT Relativity Seminar

  9. So Far • Spin-boost transformation gives Lorentz boost along spacelike vector sµ. • 2-metric hAB remains invariant under spin-boost transformation. • But the 2-metric from slide 4 is not invariant yet gives invariant area. • What is going on? UT Relativity Seminar

  10. Spin-Boost in Schwarzschild Spacetime • Apply the spin-boost formalism to Schwarzschild (Sch.) spacetime • 4-metric: • Null tetrad: (ℓµ, nµ, mµ, mµ*) ℓµ is null, tangent to EH, geodesic with λ = r • This gives • Under spin-boost trans. → Boost along r UT Relativity Seminar

  11. Spin-Boost for Sch. Spacetime contd. • Obvious choice for a tetrad in Sch. spacetime gives boost along radial direction r. • Boost along radial direction makes no sense. • Let us pick another tetrad • Start by first picking the spacelike boost direction sµ. • Use ADM formalism to pick timelike Tµ. • Construct the null tetrad from these. UT Relativity Seminar

  12. Spin-Boost for Sch. Spacetime contd. • Boost along x-direction i.e. Xµ = (0, 1, 0, 0) sµ must be unit spacelike, therefore in KS coord. (t, x, y, z) • Unit timelike Tµ is obtained from 3+1 ADM breakdown. • ℓµ is given by ℓµ = (Tµ + sµ)/ √2 UT Relativity Seminar

  13. Spin-Boost for Sch. Spacetime contd. • Put this ℓµ into geodesic eqtn. in Sch. spacetime • Not geodesic! • Worse: this is not tangent to the Sch. event horizon located at r = 2M. Easy to see this in Sch. spherical coordinates (x = r sinθ cosφ) • → can not be used UT Relativity Seminar

  14. Observations • Under spin-boost transformation, null vectors tangent to EH yield radial boost directions. • Boost direction must be rectilinear. • Picking an a priori rectilinear direction results in null vectors that are not tangent to EH, thus can not be used to show the area invariance. UT Relativity Seminar

  15. Conclusions • Although Spin-boost trans. look like regular Lorentz boosts, this is not always the case. • Certain choice of null tetrads give radial boost directions. • 2-metric hAB remains invariant under spin-boost but does NOT under Lorentz-boost. • Spin-boost derivation is not the correct way to show area invariance of AHs. • However, Area of AH still is invariant. UT Relativity Seminar

More Related