1 / 14

Legal Dispute Analysis: Snap Happy Film Processing Case Presentation

This presentation examines a legal dispute involving Snap Happy Pty Ltd and David V. Snap. David entrusted Snap Happy with two urgent film rolls necessary for an important tender. However, when he returned for his films, they were delayed, costing him a potential $4 million opportunity. We explore key areas of law including Contract Law, Negligence, and the Trade Practices Act. The presentation delves into the legal obligations, consumer rights, and possible remedies for breach of contract, alongside a role-play illustrating the case dynamics.

dalton
Télécharger la présentation

Legal Dispute Analysis: Snap Happy Film Processing Case Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GENL5020 Business FundamentalsPresentation David V Snap Happy Pty Ltd Kelvin Butt Dickson Chan Christopher Law Jennie Leung Hedley Tam Julia Suen

  2. Outline of our presentation • A role play of the case • The Areas of Law concerned • Arguments from both sides

  3. Role Play of the case…..

  4. So… David goes to Snap Happy … A film processing shop

  5. And he leaves two rolls of films for processing…… Telling the sales assistant,“These films are urgent, I’ll need them this afternoon for a tender that I need to submit”

  6. A few hours later….. David comes back to pick up his film WTF!!!!!

  7. Snap Happy offers to reprint the photos by next morning David is visibly pissed!!! He lost the chance to submit his tender and win 4 million dollars David says.. “You’ll pay for this!!!!!!” Snap Happy denies any liability whatsoever from the exclusion clause

  8. Areas of Law involved • Contract Law • Negligence (Tort) • Trade Practices Act

  9. Contract Law Satisfy 6 essential elements • Intention to create legal relationship • Offer and Acceptance • Consideration • Legal capacity of the parties • Reality of Consent (Genuine Consent) • Legality of object

  10. Arguments • Contractual Document or Receipt? • Remedies for breach of contract

  11. Arguments Trades Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - Part V Div 2: “by improving consumer contracts for the acquisition of goods and services by implying to them conditions and warranties which favour consumers.” • refund, compensation, repair or replacement for goods that are not of ‘merchantable quality’

  12. - The end -

More Related