180 likes | 613 Vues
Research Climate at the University of Zagreb School of Medicine Vedran Katavic, Ana Vujaklija, Daniela Salopek, Darko Hren University of Zagreb School of Medicine Setting 3 institutions: 2 University of Zagreb Schools (Medicine, Dental Medicine) 1 research institute all in Zagreb, Croatia
E N D
Research Climate at the University of Zagreb School of Medicine Vedran Katavic, Ana Vujaklija, Daniela Salopek, Darko Hren University of Zagreb School of Medicine
Setting • 3 institutions: • 2 University of Zagreb Schools(Medicine, Dental Medicine) • 1 research institute • all in Zagreb, Croatia
Subjects • junior members(highest achievement Ph.D.) • response rate (so far): • School of Medicine (M) – 24% (52/214) • School of Dental Medicine (DM) – 33% (16/49) • Research Institute (RI) – 32% (71/221)
Methods • Questionnaire: • modified questionnaire by Gaddis B et al, Accountability in Research. 2003;10(4):253-88. • 2 parts • biodata – individual, group, organizational • climate measurement • Sent out by mail or hand delivered (both delivering & receiving)
Methods (continued) • originally had 414 questions • reduced to 231 MCQs: • 198 biodata (88 individual, 78 group, 32 organiz.) • 33 climate measures • Likert-type scale: A-E (with some reverse scoring)
Methods (continued) • results organized into “constructs”: • 17 I, 18 G, 8 O • 14 C • lower score more positive experience/attitude
Preliminary results • Biodata measures • individual • group • organizational • Climate inventory
Biodata – Individual • 17 constructs: alienation, competitive pressure, negative peer groups, financial need, anomie, stress, incompetence, lack of situational control/resources, intrinsic work experience, negative professional role models, time frame rewards, negative/positive reward structure, consequences for failure, feedback specificity/ambiguity
Biodata – Group • 18 constructs: transformational leadership vision/individual consideration/intellectual stimulation, accountability, expertise of professor/group members, group trust, normlessness, conflict, unethical norms, competitive/production pressure, uncertainty, instability, pro-social norms, quality, process directiveness
Biodata – Organizational • 8 constructs: turbulence, munificence, integration, accountability, continuity, solidarity, pressure, ethical expectations
Climate Inventory • 14 constructs: challenge/involvement, freedom, trust, idea time, humor, lack of conflict, idea support, debate, risk taking, social caring, procedural/distributive justice, law and cone emphasis, socio-emotional support
Conclusions • ongoing study • 1st assessment of climate in Croatia • very low response rate
Conclusions continued • unsatisfactory expertise of group members • young scientists do not appreciate team leaders • not getting adequate feedback • low observed unethical behavior • social improvement necessary
Open questions • size of questionnaire – response rate (RR) • delivery method of questionnaire – RR • disillusioned young scientists – RR • limitation – cross-sectional study(NO causative conclusions)