1 / 28

Section 12: Mineralized Tissues

Section 12: Mineralized Tissues. 3. Ion exchange Mineralization Fluoride. note: paper on mech of fluorosis: JDR 84 , 832-6, 2005. 3/3/06. Hydroxyapatite (HA): ion exchange. in biological HA, ions are continuously in motion, dissociating, associating, etc. (dynamic equilibrium)

dasan
Télécharger la présentation

Section 12: Mineralized Tissues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Section 12: Mineralized Tissues 3. Ion exchangeMineralizationFluoride note: paper on mech of fluorosis: JDR 84, 832-6, 2005 3/3/06

  2. Hydroxyapatite (HA): ion exchange • in biological HA, ions are continuously in motion, dissociating, associating, etc. (dynamic equilibrium) • even when there's no net precipitation or dissolution,exchange of ions is occurring • ion exchange rates depend on location: crystalinterior v slow slow surface v fast bulk solution hydration shell 1

  3. HA: ions substituted • because bulk solutions in contact with HA vary in ion content, biological HA contains other ions: HA ions substitute ions Ca2+ Mg2+, Sr2+, Pb2+, Fe2+ PO43– CO32–HPO42– citrate3– OH–Cl–, F– , HCO3– 2

  4. HA: ions substituted • because bulk solutions in contact with HA vary in ion content, biological HA contains other ions: HA ions substitute ions Ca2+ Mg2+, Sr2+, Pb2+, Fe2+ PO43– CO32–HPO42– citrate3– OH–Cl–, F– , HCO3– • most substitutions increase HA solubility • e.g., enamel solubility higher due to presence of 2–4% CO32– (1–2 CO32–/20 PO43– ) • the term carbonated apatite sometimes used • F– exception: substitution with F–lowers solubility 2

  5. Ion exchange in HA: CO3= for PO43– trigonal tetrahedral 3

  6. Mineralization • if a solution of calcium & Pi with ion product, e.g.,1.5 mM2 (supersaturated relative to HA) is prepared,no HA forms • if crystal of HA added,it will grow until solution's ion product = K'sp • these experiments illustrate: • Ca-Pi solutions tend to stay supersaturated • precipitation on existing crystals (seed or nucleator) is much faster • stoichiometry of HA formation: 10Ca2+ + 6HPO42– + 8OH–®Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 + 6H2O 4

  7. Mineralization in vitro • if above solution's ion product increased to >3 mM2, a different CaP salt forms: calcium hydrogen phosphate: CaHPO4.2H2OK'sp= 2.6mM2 aka brushite, amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) this illustrates:though more soluble, other simpler salts form faster than HA • stoichiometry of formation & dissolution of ACP: Ca2+ + HPO42– + 2 H2O ® CaHPO4.2H2O • How do the first crystals form in mineralizing tissues? i.e., how is mineralization initiated? 5

  8. Initiation (nucleation) Ca Pi _ _ _ _ OH + + _ – _ – + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + heterogeneous nucleation (aka epitaxy):initiating template different from crystal components • first ions of crystal-to-be aligned by binding to surface of a protein Model of part ofinitiator protein:surface complementaryin shape & chargeto HA unit cell 6 after first few ions have bound

  9. Initiation (nucleation) • this first layer of ions then binds additional complementary ions to form a second layer, etc. • eventually, growth produces the final crystal • initiator proteins:phosphoryns,bone sialoprotein II • have numerous phosphorylatedser side chains: binding sites for Ca2+ of crystal-to-be • cationic side chainssupply + charges: binding sites for PO43– & OH– _ _ + _ – + + + + + + + + 7 HA unit cell

  10. Crystal Growth • matrix vesicles • phospholipid membrane-enclosed • contain bone sialoprotein II (osteoblasts) phosphoryns (odontoblasts) • produced by budding from osteoblasts/odontoblasts • contain transmembrane calcium pump (CaATPase) ATP hydrolysis drives Ca2+ transport ATP + H2O ®ADP + Pi matrix vesicle solid CaPi facil-itateddiffusion activetransport Ca2+ Pi Pi Ca2+ CaATPase 8

  11. Crystal Growth matrix vesicle • growth of crystallites facilitated by concentrating calcium & Pi (maintains ion product > Ksp) • Pi also made by hydrolysis of • phosphoestersalkaline phosphatase ROPO3– + H2O ® ROH + Pi • pyrophosphate (PPi)pyrophosphatase PPi + H2O ® 2 Pi • membrane removed at some time after initiation of crystallization solid CaPi facil-itateddiffusion activetransport Ca2+ Pi Pi Ca2+ CaATPase 9

  12. hole zone Mineralizationin bone &dentin tropocollagen ↑ • crystallitesinitially deposited inhole zones • eventually also deposited in spaces parallel to tropocollagen strands (pores) pore hst731du.gif crystallites pore hole zone hst731dl.gif adapted fromTen Cate, 5thed., Fig. 5-6 10 surface hole

  13. Mineralization of enamel 2 2 ameloblastmovement 3 1 2 3 • matrix proteins • enamelins • nucleator ? • coat surface of mature HA crystallite • amelogenins • regulate HA crystallite growth • digested by proteases during maturation • stages of mineralization 1. nucleation (at DEJ)initiator may be dentin-based 2. 2-D growth (ribbons) 3. 3-D growth (maturation) dashed line indicates volume ofcrystal after maturation 11

  14. Composition of mineralized tissues bone dentin enamelnew mature mineral, wt % 60 70 37 95 vol % 36 47 16 86 HA/total mineral 2/3 1 1 crystallite size, Ålength 200 1400width, thickness 50 800 pores, % of enamel surface area 1-2 organic, vol % 36 33 20 2 main protein collagen amelogenins enamelins H2O, vol % 28 21 64 12 12

  15. Section 12: Mineralized TissuesFluoride 3/3/06

  16. Fluoride metabolism • definitions • [F–]: 1 ppm = 1 mg/L (1 mg/kg in solids) = 50 µM • daily dose ≈ 1 mg from drinking ~ 1 L H2O with 1 ppm F – (dose = mg/L F–x volume ingested) • absorption • stomach & small intestine • via simple diffusion in stomach as HF (pKa = 3.5) • rate = k [F–] • t½ ≈ 30 min 13

  17. Fate of absorbed fluoride • [F–] in plasma: ≈ 1µM for 1 mg daily dose • crosses placenta • present in breast milk • deposited in bone • via ion-exchange (non-enzymatic, at/near equilibrium) • adults: ~50% of dose • infants: 70-80% • rest excreted via kidneys • rate = k [F–] in plasma • t½ ≈ 4 hr (range: 2-9 hr) 14

  18. Fluoride toxicity: lethal dentalfluorosis acutelethal chronicfluorosis • acute lethal:due to • F – inhibition of numerous enzymes • reaction of F – with Ca2+ in ECF (CaF2 precipitates) low [Ca2+] excites nerve & muscle cellshypocalcemic tetany laryngospasm 10 g 1 mg 10 1 g 100 mg daily fluoride dose (log scale) 15

  19. Fluoride toxicity: fluorosis dentalfluorosis acutelethal chronicfluorosis • chronic fluorosis (aka skeletal fluorosis, osteofluorosis) • multi-year exposure • hypermineralization of bone resorption inhibited, formation increased* • ectopic mineralization of tendons, ligaments 10 g 1 mg 10 1 g 100 mg daily fluoride dose (log scale) *these effects are the basis for fluoride use in osteoporosis prevention/treatment 16

  20. Fluoride toxicity: fluorosis dentalfluorosis acutelethal chronicfluorosis • dental fluorosis: enamel hypomineralization • fluorotic enamel contains more protein, less mineral • due to exposure to high [F–] during enamel formation • pore size >2% • probable contributory factors • impaired apoptosis of ameloblasts • inhibition of amelogenin-digesting proteases duringenamel maturation 10 g 1 mg 10 1 g 100 mg daily fluoride dose (log scale) 17

  21. Effect of fluoride on caries & dental fluorosis 10 4 1. v mild: small chalky areas < 25% of surface 2. mild: white opacities < 50% of surface 3. moderate: brown staining; some on all surfaces 4. severe: extensive discoloration & hypoplasia 2 decayed, missing, filled 5 fluorosis index 0 10 1 0.1 ppm fluoride Fluorosis index (one version) 18

  22. Anticaries effect of fluoride • presence of fluoride during enamel formation and/or remineralization results in partial replacement of OH– with F– in HA • molecular rationale for anticaries effect • F– ion smaller & more symmetrical than OH–, allowing better packing of ions • within unit cell • between unit cells (shared ions) • interionic attractions greater, so solid state stabilized, therefore solubility (K'sp) lower 19

  23. Ion exchange: F– for OH– hydroxyapatite unit cell,with 1 OH– replaced by 1 F– for presenting 20

  24. Anticaries effect of fluoride (cont’d) • HA crystals larger, have fewer defects (imperfections) • resulting enamel has less space between crystals (smaller pores) • stoichiometry of hydroxyapatite ↔ fluorapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 +2 F– ↔ Ca10(PO4)6F2 + 2 OH– (complete replacement of OH– by F– would yield 38,000 ppm F–) • maximum replacement <10% of this 21

  25. Tooth surface proximity & F– concentration • HA nearest enamel surface has highest [F–] • surface HA has lower solubilitydue to higher F– content • surface accumulationprobably due to F–incorporation duringcrown maturation • additionally, F– is added by long-term ion-exchange & demineralization/remineralization ppm in H2O 1 2000 0.1 ppm fluoride 1000 25 50 22 microns from surface

  26. Fluoride incorporation over time 4000 5 ppm in H2O • F – content of HA increases with age • dependent on [F–] in H2O • incorporation into HA by: remineralization ion exchange • F – presence in saliva inhibits net demineralization • topical F – application with high [F–] produces CaF2 deposit,providing slow-release of F– 2000 ppm F in surface enamel 1000 600 1 ppm in H2O 400 30 50 tooth age, years 23

  27. Anticaries effect of fluoride:topical vs. systemic high systemic-F– thenlow topical-F– • people with enamel made in high-F– area who move to low-F– area have higher caries rate • people with enamel made in low-F– area who • move to high-F– area • use F– toothpastes have lower caries rate • people take on caries rate of region they move to • results suggest that F– presence during demineralization/ remineralization* is most important anticaries effect • i.e., topical exposure to F– more important than systemic exposure * acid challenges low systemic-F– thenhigh topical-F– (acid challenges) info from"Fluoride in Dentistry" chptr 19 24

  28. Next: 4. Saliva, pellicle, plaque Open next slide-set

More Related