1 / 7

Groupthink Theory: History, Conditions, and Ways to Prevent Negative Outcomes

Explore the history and assumptions of groupthink theory, including conditions that promote high affiliation and homogeneity. Learn about symptoms and ways to prevent negative outcomes through vigilant decision-making processes. Discover weaknesses and limitations of the theory.

dclodfelter
Télécharger la présentation

Groupthink Theory: History, Conditions, and Ways to Prevent Negative Outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To Know from Kramer & Dougherty (2013) • Examples of times groupthink (bad) was present, but outcomes weren’t necessarily • Ways this occurred & how avoided neg. outcomes • Ways the ex’s could easily have had neg. results • Potential for pos, neg, or ambiguous outcomes

  2. History of Groupthink Theory

  3. Assumptions • Conditions in grps promote high • “We” instead of “I” 2. Grp problem solving is mostly • Affiliative constraints - • Homogeneity - 3. Grps & decision-making are complex • Antecedent Conditions - • Symptoms -

  4. Symptoms • Concurrence seeking • Overestimation of group • Illusion of • Belief in • Closed-Mindedness • Collective rationalization (ignore warnings) • Pressure toward • Illusion of • Self-appointed

  5. Ways to Prevent • Engage in vigilant decision-making process • Janis recommended 8, but criticized (collegiality/fractionalism)… so… • ‘tHart (1994) proposes 4: • Require • Embrace • Allow for objection – • Balance

  6. Strengths • Only applied by Janis to decision-making groups in crisis periods

  7. Weaknesses • – ½ symptoms of groupthink are not associated with concurrence seeking, as theory proposes

More Related