1 / 59

Week 10

Week 10. GSBS6040 Human Resources Management asif.hoshiarpur@newcastle.edu.au. Industrial Conflict, Issues of Employee Voice and Ethics of ER and HRM. Conflict. Different approaches to conflict between unitarist and pluralist approaches Increasing need for skills at workplace level

dean
Télécharger la présentation

Week 10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Week 10 GSBS6040 Human Resources Management asif.hoshiarpur@newcastle.edu.au

  2. Industrial Conflict, Issues of Employee Voice and Ethics of ER and HRM

  3. Conflict • Different approaches to conflict between unitarist and pluralist approaches • Increasing need for skills at workplace level • Less formal methods

  4. The nature of conflict • Leaner organisations • Competitive global environment • Overt conflict decreasing but internal is not • Nature of conflict changing

  5. Negative consequences of conflict Critical Issue 1: Negative Aspects of conflict ‘Conflict is inevitable in the employment relationship’ Debate this statement.

  6. Positive consequencesof conflict • Heightens awareness of issues • Catalyst for organisational change • Strengthens existing relationships • Heightens morale • Promotes awareness of self and others • Enhances personal development

  7. Industrial conflict • Reducing globally due to: • changing nature of work • increasing reliance on sub-contracted and casual labour • increased employee knowledge and skills to negotiate for themselves • focus on individual bargaining

  8. Industrial disputes in Australia

  9. Industrial disputes/conflict • Unresolved dispute/conflict has escalated to a higher level • Threat of lost work time, disruptions and/or work bans • Relate to breaches of law, awards or agreements • Involvement of external agencies • Resolution is formal via a recognised tribunal or conciliation and arbitration third-party mechanisms

  10. Workplace disputes/conflict • Result of differences of opinion during bargaining phases • Lower level • Threat of lost time and/or bans not made • Resolved internally with assistance of a third-party mediator

  11. Alternative dispute resolution • Known as ADR • Independent, third party • Provides stability • Can lead to a sense of ‘failure’ for original parties not being able to resolve issue themselves • Two main forms: Conciliation and arbitration

  12. Conciliation • Precursor to arbitration • Third party seeks to bring the disputants to the point where they can reach agreement • Unsuccessful resolution can be referred to arbitration • Fair Work Act 2009 has reinforced the need for conciliation in the first instance

  13. Arbitration Formal process when conciliation proves unsuccessful Involves low levels of negotiator control Compulsory nature arbitrator is not chosen parties cannot opt out of proceedings decision is legally binding

  14. ADR process Critical Issue 2: Third-party dispute resolution ‘Third-party involvement is undesirable in the employment relationship because it deflects responsibility for decisions and behaviour away from the parties directly involved.’ Do you agree with this statement? Justify your response.

  15. Mediation • The process whereby a third party helps the other parties in a conflict to achieve agreement by guiding them Critical Issue 3: Mediation Are mediators born or developed? Justify your answer.

  16. Mediation vs negotiation

  17. Definition of negotiation ‘Negotiation (or bargaining) involves the bringing together for examination, comparison and argument the opposing claims of employer(s) and employee(s).’ (Nankervis, Compton, Baird & Coffey 2011, p.511) • Aims to: • resolve or avert • produce mutually acceptable solution

  18. Negotiation skills Critical Issue 4: Skills for successful negotiations Reflect on your own negotiation successes. What skills do you believe assisted in achieving such success?

  19. Conflict management styles • Contending (competing, dominating or fighting) • Yielding (accommodating and obliging) • Inaction (avoidance) • Compromising • Problem solving (cooperative problem solving, collaborating or integrating)

  20. Critical Issue 5: Recognising conflict management styles ‘Generally, avoidance is the best conflict management strategy to adopt, as most conflict tends to resolve itself over time and intervening often serves only to escalate the problem.’ Do you agree with this statement? Justify your response.

  21. Cross-cultural awareness • Western individualistic view of conflict not universal • Technology not necessarily a solution • Action plan to avoid cross-cultural misunderstandings: • assess unique features • acknowledge • attitude adjustment • action • analysis

  22. Critical Issue 6: Cross-cultural awareness Is it possible to ever develop a true understanding of cultural issues and differences in a workplace environment?

  23. Employee Voice • Cranfield University view • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8u67DS8osI

  24. A few concepts first • Official employment contract • Psychological contract • Exchange relationship

  25. Definition:Employee Voice (and Exit) “There are two main types of activist reactions to discontent with organizations to which one belongs or with which one does business: either to voice one's complaints, while continuing as a member or customer, in the hope of improving matters; or to exit from the organization, to take one's business elsewhere.” [Hirschman 1978:90] “Voice, as defined by Hirschman, is any attempt to change rather than escape from an unsatisfactory situation. In the employment context, voice involves the expression of dissatisfaction by employees; exit occurs when employees quit.” [Hirschman, 1970 in Batt, Colvin and O’Keefe, 2002: 574]

  26. Voice as: An articulation of individual dissatisfaction (or satisfaction) An expression of collective organisation Contribution to management decision-making Demonstration of mutuality and co-operative relations Mechanisms/practices to express it Complaint to line manager; grievance procedure; speak-up programme; attitude survey (and exit) Union recognition; collective bargaining; industrial action Upward problem-solving groups, QCs, SMTs Partnership agreements; JCCs; Works Councils Definitions and classifications‘Employee voice’

  27. The contested nature and changing contours of employee voice ‘Employee voice’ is a term covering all types of opportunities for employees to have a say and exert some influence over workplace decisions that affect their interests. The fundamental issue is: how much influence do, and should, employees have over decisions that affect them at work? We should not look at this area solely in economic terms. It is heavily political: the tension between social legitimacy and managerial power is involved.

  28. Employee representation • An employee is someone employed directly by an organisation in some capacity/arrangement • Differs from a contractual relationship • Managers make arrangements with employees to set or change terms of employment such as wages, hours, benefits, conditions, policies and procedures • Employee representation describes the mechanism and/or group and/or person who represents the employee’s (or employees’) interests in making or changing those arrangements

  29. Classifications of ‘Employee representation’ There are different forms of representation: • Individual vscollective • Union vs.non-union • State-sponsored vs. employer-initiated Forms of employee representation vary by • purpose • degree of independence from management • rights and powers.

  30. Why do managers recognise employee representation? Put another way, why don’t managers make all decisions about employment arrangements themselves? • Because they want to recognise employee representation… they see advantages in consulting their employees • Because they are forced to recognise employee representation • by the power of an individual employee, or collective organisation • because the state requires them to deal with employees or their representatives

  31. Why do employees want representation? Why do employees want representation other than themselves in this process? • Imbalance of power • Imbalance of information • Imbalance of experience/expertise • Other?

  32. Individual v. collective Employees can represent their interests as individuals, either themselves, or with another party acting for them (eg. lawyer, guardian) For example, through • individual discussions • individual bargaining or using individual agents • employee attitude surveys or similar mechanisms • feedback to line managers/team members • participation in problem-solving groups

  33. Individual v. collective Individual representation may not work: • Impractical/costly (for employers), especially in large organisations • costly (for employees), using lawyers, agents • ineffective (for employees), especially because of power imbalance So collective forms of representation emerge: • Union and non-union forms • Great diversity within and between industries and countries

  34. Collective forms of employee representation

  35. Voluntary recognition by managers of collective representation • Values? Because managers believe in democracy at work • Efficiency? Because managers consider that listening to employees will produce better management decisions, leading to better organisational performance • Significant evidence that this is true [eg. Gill and Krieger 1999] • Pragmatism? Because, tactically, consulting voluntarily with employees avoids more negative and restrictive forms of employees representation

  36. Management-initiated non-union representation • Employers’ interest in management-initiated employee representation has waxed and waned over the years • Employee ‘forums’ • Attitude surveys • Australian managers do not have a strong history of engaging their employees through these mechanisms • Some exceptions eg. ICI Botany (see Davis & Lansbury 1996); Hydro Aluminium Kurri Kurri; Edison Mission Energy at Loy Yang B; BOC Gas; Lincoln Electric • These forms, while they may deliver mutual gains, can be fragile in the face of change (eg. change in management)

  37. State-sanctioned non-union representation • Intervention by the state (mostly through legislative requirements on employers) usually involves: • ‘indirect’ forms of employee representation, such as Works Councils, elected worker directors • both consultative and decision-making (i.e. ‘co-determination’) • Existence is independent of managers • Australia has few examples of state-sanctioned employee representation: • OH&S committees • non-union collective bargaining • Access to grievance procedures • Most common in Europe (eg. Germany, Norway); also in Japan, Korea in the form of Works Councils

  38. Union Forms of Collective Employee Representation • What is a trade union? ‘an organisation consisting predominantly of employees, the principal activities of which include the negotiation of rates of pay and conditions of employment of its members’ (ABS) • Originally a trades focus but may be organised along other lines • A key feature of unions is the degree of their independence from management • ‘enterprise’ unions – traditionally in Japan, now in China • vs. fully independent legal organisations, required to represent the interests of their members

  39. CollectiveVoice “Collective voice achieves what the lone voice could never do: it humanizes and civilizes the workplace.”

  40. The contested nature and changing contours of employee voice … Few governments leave choices in this area solely to management: after all, we are talking here about what sort of limits should be placed on ‘management prerogative’. Ultimately, the justification for employee voice is as an end in its own right in a society committed to democratic values and in a world-order, or international trading environment, in which the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and various governments have an interest in baseline labour standards. Question: How does the demand for employee voice vary over time? In your view, where are we now in what Ramsay (1997) called the ‘cycle of control’?

  41. The contested nature and changing contours of employee voice … Direct voice is about workers having a say in how to do their jobs (e.g. deciding on work methods) or having influence over their personal working conditions (e.g. choosing their start-and-finish times). This form of voice is worked out in the relationship between the individual and their supervisor or it may be based around a process of decision-making in the work team (e.g. problem-solving groups and self-managing teams). This kind of voice is largely informal and located at the point of production.

  42. What is Ethics? • Ethics is a code of behaviour set by a community that may differ from a code of behaviour set by another community. eg consumption of alcohol in public. • Euthanasia, the voluntary ending of a person’s life is legal in some nations but illegal in others • One ordinarily feels obliged to be ethical as it is codified by laws set by the community

  43. Two views of ethics • At one extreme there is the ‘pure’ view of ethics. If an act is wrong then it is wrong!! • At the other extreme there is the view that an act can be seen as ethical if it creates an outcome for the common good.

  44. Ethical Thinking • It is concerned with Justifying • It adopts an impartial point of view, and so is different from Self-interest • It results in Judgements that are not limited to me or you, but are universal in form, e.g. “it is wrong to lie to OR to cheat another person” OR • It may be acceptable to lie to another or others if this is for the common good.

  45. Ethical Theories – Two extremes • Deontology - Ethics as recognizing “Duties”. Based on what is moral. Based very much on philosophy and theology. An act is right or wrong. • Utilitarianism - Ethics as bringing about the most good for the community. Ends may justify the means.

  46. Utilitarianism: Pros and Cons • The Plus Side: we should always act to bring about a better world, not just abide by rules • The Minus Side: what if bringing about a good result requires violating rights? The Utilitarianist will argue that rights are not fundamental

  47. Methods to ensure Ethical Practice in Organisations • How do organisations seek to ensure that employees and associates behave ‘ethically’? • How well do these methods work?

  48. Method 1: Code of practice Eg. Code of conduct for The University of Newcastle • The University of Newcastle is firmly committed to the principles of cooperation, collaboration, inclusion, flexibility and innovation. • As a result, the University is a model for integrity, excellence, achievement and has a clear sense of identity.  ... • The code aims to maintain public trust and confidence in the integrity and professionalism of our graduates, the teaching and learning, research and research training, and community service activities of the University and the facilities and services that make up the University experience. • This code applies to students, staff, [and others eg. University Council] ... What is required to make a Code of Conduct effective?

  49. Method 2: Organisational values Values can be defined as: “central desires or beliefs regarding final states or desirable conducts that transcend specific situations, guide the choice and evaluation of our decisions and, therefore of our conducts, becoming an integral part of our way of being and acting to the point of shaping our character … Values are normative: they tell us how we should behave - although they are often presented in positive terms.” Can organisations have values?

  50. Method 3: Whistleblower protection • One definition of ‘whistleblowing’ is: • … the disclosure by organisation members (former or current) of illegal, immoral or illegitimate practices under the control of their employers to persons that may be able to effect action. [Select Committee, 1994] • In Australia, legislation is generally limited to people with information about public sector organisations • Protections may include anonymity, protection from reprisal or prosecution • What might barriers to effective whistleblower protection within private sector organisations?

More Related