1 / 17

Optical simulation system for brain waves detection & measurements

Optical simulation system for brain waves detection & measurements. Performed by: Yevgeny Safovich Pilnick Nadav. Mid-term presentation. Supervised by: Hen Broodney. Problem Definition. Measure eye vision quality objectively

dena
Télécharger la présentation

Optical simulation system for brain waves detection & measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Optical simulation system for brain waves detection & measurements Performed by: Yevgeny Safovich Pilnick Nadav Mid-term presentation Supervised by: Hen Broodney

  2. Problem Definition • Measure eye vision quality objectively • The vision should be measured (almost) without cooperation of the person being examined

  3. Solution • Use PC to transmit series of images of different colors at certain frequencies in front of the patient (as a stimulation) • Use Electronic device to measure brain waves caused by change of vision • Conclude regarding to the patient’s vision abilities

  4. Requirements • Images • 3 pairs of colors: • Blue, Yellow • Green, Red • Black, White • Each pair has its own “blank” color: the average of the colors in the pair • Steps frequency: 0.5Hz – 10Hz, resolution 1Hz • dx = The delta between the Monitor output and the electrical pulse output. 0.5ms < dx < 1.5ms

  5. End Begin Definitions • Screen Refresh Rate • Vertical Blank Interval (VBI) • DirectDraw • Primary Surface • Front Buffer • Back Buffers • Flip • Performance counter

  6. Solution Algorithm Operator Computer Video Card Brain Waves meter Monitor Human * The red interfaces should be synchronized

  7. Timing Operator Computer Video Card Monitor Human Brain Waves meter t t1a t1b t2 t3 t4 t5 • 0.5ms < |t5 – t3| < 1.5ms • |t4 – t3| - We suppose this time does not matter and is taken care of by the “Brain Waves meter” • |t3 – t2| - We suppose this interval is negligible • |t2 – t1b| - The major problem of the project, discussed below • |t5 – t1a| - A problem discussed below

  8. Timing: focus Time • Ta = VBI begin • Tb = Flip • Tc = Flip Critical time • Td = Flip End • Te =t1a = Out pulse sent • Tf = t5 = Out pulse received (~ t1d) • Tg = t2 = VBI end Ta Tc Td Te Tf Tg Tb Screen Front Buffer

  9. Feasibility Testing • Testing Screen Sync.: • The goal is to ensure that the new image is shown at the screen ‘at the moment’ the Pulse is sent to the parallel port. • Testing Pulse delay: • The goal is to ensure that the time between sending the pulse and receiving (Tf – Te), is negligible Roundtrip delay testing

  10. Synchronization Solution • Build two Surfaces in DirectDraw • Front (Primary Surface) • Back (Attached Surface) • Use windows priority mechanism to give maximum priority to the process (Real-Time) and worker thread (Critical) • Use DirectDraw to determine VBI begin(t1b) • Use DirectDraw to Flip the Surfaces • Use Parallel port in order to send output Pulse • Use performance counter to ensure we did not miss the Flip critical time (t1f)

  11. Parallel port Interface Video Interface Parallel port Wrapper (DLPortIO) Video Interface Wrapper (DirectDraw) Run-time Module Database Module Configuration module Main application Module Project Blocks Diagram

  12. Statistics • The next run assumed pulse delay is 5 ms.The application collects maximum and minimum times • Implicitly neglected the time it takes for the pulse to be received (Tf-Te). Experiments showed Maximum time of ~0.04 ms RoundTrip. • Conclusions: • We did not miss a single sync. • Most Extreme results show 32.7 microsecond difference (~5.05 ms , ~5.08 ms). Way below requirements

  13. Application screens • Main screen

  14. Application screens • Menu options • Colors pairs • Element type • Page layout

  15. Application screens • Page configuration

  16. Application screens • Options

  17. Appendix 1DirectDraw • Interface IDirectDraw7 • ::WaitForVerticalBlank(…) • Interface IDirectDrawSurface7 • ::Flip(…)

More Related