1 / 59

Stephen Gray, USGS Tucson

Nonlinear Interactions Between Climate, Landscape Structure, and Plant Migration. Stephen Gray, USGS Tucson With: Julio Betancourt, Lisa Graumlich, Steve Jackson, Mark Lyford, Jodi Norris, and Greg Pederson. Global Change Impacts?. TNC Invasives Project. Plant Migration and Invasion.

Télécharger la présentation

Stephen Gray, USGS Tucson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nonlinear Interactions Between Climate, Landscape Structure, and Plant Migration Stephen Gray, USGS Tucson With: Julio Betancourt, Lisa Graumlich, Steve Jackson, Mark Lyford, Jodi Norris, and Greg Pederson

  2. Global Change Impacts?

  3. TNC Invasives Project

  4. Plant Migration and Invasion • Expect significant shifts in the distribution of plant species • Will contribute to major vegetation/ ecosystem change across the West • Driven by: • Changing climate • Land use • Exotic introductions • Human vectors, etc.

  5. Forecasting Environmental Change • Sustainable land management requires realistic predictions for future vegetation change • Provide viable scenarios for planning and policy • Tool for policy makers and stakeholders to explore potential ecological outcomes and the costs/consequences of management and mitigation efforts

  6. Nonlinear Behavior and Environmental Forecasting • Nonlinearity is a major obstacle to environmental forecasting • Examples of nonlinear behavior- • Threshold responses • Feedbacks • Cascading responses • Cross-scale interactions

  7. The Classic Example: Nonlinear Behavior in the Spread of Large Fires Large Area: feedbacks and nonlinear interactions Predictability? Ignition- single tree Spread within patch Spread among patches Peters et al (2004) PNAS

  8. Nonlinearity in Western Ecosystems • Focus on inherent complexity in biological processes or cross-scale interactions

  9. Nonlinearity in Western Ecosystems • Focus on inherent complexity in biological processes or cross-scale interactions • But, non-stationary (i.e. regime-like) behavior in the climate system may also produce nonlinear dynamics in natural systems

  10. Nonlinearity in Western Ecosystems • Focus on inherent nonlinearity in biological processes or cross-scale interactions • But, non-stationary (i.e. regime-like) behavior in the climate system may also produce nonlinear dynamics in natural systems • Examples: Woody plant migration and invasion in western North America

  11. The Ecologist’s Concept of Climate 0 50 100 25 75 Traditional View: Climate as stochastic variations around STATIONARY mean

  12. North American Tree-ring Network NOAA-NCDC Spring 2005

  13. Test Case: Greater Yellowstone Precipitation • High variance explained (r2 =0.58) • Well replicated (n = 133) • Long segments (Avg. Length = 385 yr) • Conservative detrending Gray, Graumlich and Betancourt(in review) Quat. Res.

  14. Test Case: Greater Yellowstone Precipitation

  15. 21-yr Spline 60-yr Spline Test Case: Greater Yellowstone Precipitation

  16. Rocky Mountain Climate-Reconstruction Network Gray et al. GRL (2003)

  17. D2M variability and associated wet/dry regimes can become synchronized across large portions of the West Gridded PDSI reconstructions from Cook et al. 2004, Science

  18. Example: Upper Colorado Basin Annual Precipitation Standard deviations Non-stationary (regime-like) behavior Year AD • The mean, SD, probability of • extreme single year events, etc. • changes over D2M timescales Hidalgo 2004; Gray et al. 2003, 2004

  19. Is this D2M Variability Real? • Not an artifact of tree-ring methodology • Signals are coherent at regional to sub-continental scales • Feature of winter and growing season temp/precip • Recent modeling studies reproduce D2M variability • Schubert et al. (2004) Science • Seager et al. (2005) J. Climate • Sutton and Hodson (2005) Science • But, will D2M variability continue in the future?

  20. D2M Variability and Internal Ocean Processes

  21. Coupled interactions (i.e. the Bjerknes feedback) amplify the East/west temperature difference Uniform heating Larger temperature response in the West 0 m Cooling by upwelling opposes forcing in the East, reducing temperature response Warm, mixed Surface layer 50 ~20ºC 100 Deep, cold ocean waters ~20ºC 150 Ocean ‘thermostat’ mechanism (Clement et al. 1996)

  22. The Big Question… • How does D2M variability and associated climatic regimes impact plant invasion and migration processes?

  23. Tree rings: Climate/Demography

  24. Climatic Regimes Pace Migration/Invasion Events Dutch John Mtn., Utah -Northernmost P. edulis -Study encompasses 25 km2 watershed -Reconstructed pinyon dynamics from woodrat middens and dated wood Jackson et al. (2005), J. Biogeography 32:1085-1106. Gray et al. (in press), Ecology

  25. Migration Dynamics at the Landscape/Watershed Scale all sites no pinyon % Area Occupied pinyon dominates no sites Step-like change in the distribution and abundance of pinyon pine at the watershed/landscape scale

  26. Migration Dynamics at the Landscape/Watershed Scale Medieval Dry Period Modified drought index all sites Little or no successful establishment % Area Occupied no sites

  27. Migration Dynamics at the Landscape/Watershed Scale Modified drought index “Great Drought” all sites Small Population % Area Occupied no sites

  28. Migration Dynamics at the Landscape/Watershed Scale “Great Wet” Modified drought index all sites Step-like change in pinyon abundance & distribution % Area Occupied no sites

  29. Switching between dry/wet regimes drives nonlinear invasion dynamics Step-like Change “D2M” Wet Regime Rapid Recruitment Low Mortality

  30. Switching between dry/wet regimes drives non-linear invasion dynamics Broadscale Mortality Abundance of Open Niches “D2M” Dry Regime Step-like Change “D2M” Wet Regime Rapid Recruitment Low Mortality

  31. absent present Holocene Migration Dynamics: Utah Juniper • - Reconstructed from 205 • woodrat middens at 14 sites • Lyford et al. (2003) Ecol. • Monog. 73:567-583 Rocky Mts Distribution of Utah Juniper: Modern (shaded) Glacial (>13 kyr BP)

  32. 10,000 yr BP CLIMATIC REGIMES AND UTAH JUNIPER MIGRATION 12 MT Current Dist. 10 WY 8 6 Sites Occupied 4 2 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 cal yr B.P. - Reconstructed from 205 woodrat middens at 14 sites • Climate inferred from lake • sediments and dune records Lyford et al. (2003) Ecol. Monog. 73:567-583

  33. 10,000 yr BP CLIMATIC REGIMES AND UTAH JUNIPER MIGRATION 12 MT Current Dist. 10 WY Migration Stalls During Cold Periods 8 6 Sites Occupied 4 2 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 cal yr B.P. - Reconstructed from 205 woodrat middens at 14 sites • Climate inferred from lake • sediments and dune records Lyford et al. (2003) Ecol. Monog. 73:567-583

  34. CLIMATIC REGIMES AND UTAH JUNIPER MIGRATION MT Youngest WY Oldest 10 kyr BP Lyford et al. (2003) Ecol. Monog. 73:567-583

  35. CLIMATIC REGIMES AND UTAH JUNIPER MIGRATION MT MT Youngest 5.7 kyr BP WY WY 6.4 kyr BP Oldest 10 kyr BP 10 kyr BP Lyford et al. (2003) Ecol. Monog. 73:567-583

  36. UTAH JUNIPER DISTRIBUTION IN RELATION TO CLIMATE AND SUBSTRATE (Lyford et al. 2003) Modern Climate Cold Scenario WY > 350 km ~ 60 km • Abundant habitat • in northern areas • Short distances • between suit. hab. • Less suitable habitat • in northern areas • Requires long-distance • dispersal Lyford et al. (2003) Ecol. Monog. 73:567-583

  37. INTERACTION BETWEEN CLIMATIC REGIMES AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE Favorable Climatic Regime Less-favorable Regime + + Lower probability of survival Higher probability of survival

  38. INTERACTION BETWEEN CLIMATIC REGIMES AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE Favorable Climatic Regime Less-favorable Regime High connectivity Reduced connectivity

  39. Climatic Regimes Nonlinear Dynamics Regime-like behavior in the climate system promotes step-like changes that may persist for decades to millennia MT Interactions between climate and other factors may introduce marked spatial and temporal complexity to ecological processes 5.7 kyr BP WY 6.4 kyr BP 10 kyr BP

  40. How/why does climate drive nonlinear change?

  41. How/why does climate drive nonlinear change? • Climate affects large areas simultaneously

  42. CLIMATIC REGIMES MAY BECOME SYNCHRONIZED OVER WIDE AREAS After Fye et al. 2003

  43. What Governs the Impact of Climatic Regimes? Magnitude/ Duration of regimes? Magnitude/ Rate of Shift? Past Present

  44. Does the Frequency of Regime Shifts Alter the Ecological Impact of Climate? Woodhouse, Gray and Meko (in review) = sig. (p < 0.05) decadal to multidecadal power

More Related