Navy Problem

1. Campus-Wide Integrated Projects Navy Problem “Customer” with a problem Institute NPS Expertise Project Leadership NPS Student/Faculty Project

2. Campus-Wide Integrated Projects Navy Problem “Customer” with a problem Institute NPS Expertise Project Leadership NPS Student/Faculty Project

3. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM • Project • Education built around a carefully chosen problem • Of urgent interest to Navy top leadership • Picked in consultation with Superintendent NPS, NWC, SSG, ISEA Advisory Board • Within capability of student/faculty teams • That develops team building/leadership skills • That explores end-to-end problem solutions • Resulting in a substantive report(s) Project is major unifying theme for program. Brings home the systems-based nature of development and of change.

4. 2002 Integrated Project • Examine Expeditionary Warfare from top down and bottom up • Top Down • What is needed to do EW well? • Functional Analysis and flow down • Integrateacross needed functions – describe result • Bottom Up • Review programs, real and planned • Integrate capabilities • Compare; identify mismatches

5. 2002 Integrated ProjectConstituent Parts • Systems Engineering/analysis Students • Ops Analysis; Campaign Analysis; Mission Needs • Total Ship Systems Engineering • Ship Concept Design(s) • Aero Engineering Design • Air Vehicle Concept Design(s) • Logistics students and faculty • Theses/projects • C4I students and faculty • Theses/projects To Explore: Space Systems Engineering; Info Warfare; Electronic Warfare; Spec Ops; etc.

6. OPNAV Tasker • Highlights • ExWar systems using “top down” system of systems approach • Explore in context of emerging operational concepts • Maritime Vision • The Naval Operational Concept • The Maritime Concept • Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare • VARIOUS SUPPORTING CONOPS

7. OPNAV Tasker • Excursions • HSV types of platforms • Seabasing options for logistics, command and support of ops ashore • Options for command and control of forces • Specific Questions • Effects of platform speed on logistics and warfighting • Impact of lower footprint ashore • “Missionizing” or modularity of ship weapons and sensors • Opportunities for reduced manning of systems

8. OPNAV Tasker • Intent to address broad scope of systems, including current programs of record as baseline • Expect wide student and faculty participation

9. Integrated Project Roadmap (?) Spring Summer Fall 4 weeks TSSE Space Ops Aero Design Requirements Generation (SEI) C4I Report Writing Log SEI Analysis & CONOPS

10. Functional Analysis Concept of Operations Determination of needed capabilities Project of expected capabilities Review Programs of Record Top Down COMPARE ID “gaps”, needs, shortfalls, opportunities Bottom Up • Emphasize interfaces and synergies throughout

11. NPS Interdisciplinary Focus Brings Unique Value to the Navy • Students who have “high fidelity” experience in processes for developing combat-effective systems • Reports, analyses, projects with potential to bring innovative solutions to real DON/DOD needs • Both process and product closely tied to students’ educational foundation • Meet all educational goals • Keep faculty involved at forefront of DON/DOD needs • Provide catalyst for application of research to problems and for project-driven future research