1 / 49

Observation of Anomalous e + e -   ( nS ) h + h - Production at  ( 5S ) Energies

Observation of Anomalous e + e -   ( nS ) h + h - Production at  ( 5S ) Energies. November 15, 2007, SLAC Experimental Seminar. Outline. Motivation  (4S),  (3S)   (1S) p + p - Template Dataset on  (5S) Event Selection for  (nS) h + h - Results Discussion Summary.

devona
Télécharger la présentation

Observation of Anomalous e + e -   ( nS ) h + h - Production at  ( 5S ) Energies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Observation of Anomalous e+e-(nS)h+h- Production at (5S) Energies November 15, 2007, SLACExperimental Seminar

  2. Outline • Motivation • (4S), (3S)  (1S)p+p- Template • Dataset on (5S) • Event Selection for (nS)h+h- • Results • Discussion • Summary All Results Preliminary arXiv:0710.2577 To be submitted soon to PRL

  3. Motivation

  4. 477 fb-1 ~ 1.7 x 10-5 expect limits only ... Motivation I: because it’s there Belle has ~ 20 fb-1(5S)data G≃ 110 MeV G≃ 20.5 MeV Gee≃ 0.13 keV Gee≃ 0.27 keV

  5. Motivation II: Enhancement? PRD 74, 017504 (2006)

  6. Motivation II: Enhancement? Conceived during FPCP2006 April ’06 in Vancouver PRD 74, 017504 (2006)

  7. Motivation of Motivation I sat through this SLAC Expt’l Seminar ...

  8. Motivation of Motivation 1-- Shuwei YE

  9. Motivation II: Enhancement? Y(4260)

  10. Note to myself ~ 7/13/05 Shuwei YE

  11. Shuwei YE

  12. [cs][cs]-bar 4-quark state Shuwei YE

  13. hep-ph/0308293 nucl-th/0307116

  14. Motivation II: Enhancement?

  15. June 2005: Belle @ KEKB ~ 1.86 fb-1 • engineering run • June 9-31, 2006: Belle @ KEKB • ≅ 21.7 fb-1 Backdrop: Data on (5S) • 1985: CUSB, CLEO @ CESR ~ 116 pb-1 • 2003: CLEO III @ CESR ~ 0.42 fb-1

  16. (2S) (3S) (4S)(5S) Hint of events above background 1.86 fb-1 Rough study ~ 9/2006 (post summer) solely because of “computing”. Took a year to analyze 21.7 fb-1,

  17. (3S), (4S)  (1S)p+p- Template Not a new subject

  18. ((1S)) DM (3S)  (1S)p+p-Understanding (for (3S)  p+p-+ nothing) PRL 98, 132001 (2007) 2.9 fb-1 PRD 75, 072001 (2007) 1.14 fb-1

  19. Data from (3S) Run 528±24 3S 2S (3S)(2S)p+p- 1315±39 1S (3S)(1S)p+p- (2S)(1S)p+p- 4556±70 More can be done at Belle ...

  20. CLEO Model PRD 75, 072001 (2007) ☞ allow Ep1Ep2 term ! Data from (3S) Run (2S)(1S)p+p- (3S)(1S)p+p- Moxhay Model Brown-Cahn Model CLEO Model CLEO Model (3S)(2S)p+p- Brown-Cahn Model Much better data than CLEO CLEO Model

  21. 211 fb-1 (4S)  (1S)p+p- Template PRD 75, 071103(R) (2007) ~ 10-4 477 fb-1 2S 3S 4S PRL 96, 232001 (2006)

  22. Data on (4S) (2S)(1S)p+p- (3S)(1S)p+p- CLEO Model CLEO Model (4S)(1S)p+p- Brown-Cahn Model

  23. (3S), (4S)  (1S)p+p- Template Published papers by Belle, BaBar and CLEO So, (5S) straightforward.

  24. Dataset on (5S)

  25. 14 countries, 55 institutes, ~400 collaborators International Collaboration: Belle Seoul National U. Shinshu U. Sungkyunkwan U. U. of Sydney Tata Institute Toho U. Tohoku U. Tohuku Gakuin U. U. of Tokyo Tokyo Inst. of Tech. Tokyo Metropolitan U. Tokyo U. of Agri. and Tech. INFN Torino Toyama Nat’l College VPI Yonsei U. Nagoya U. Nara Women’s U. National Central U. National Taiwan U. National United U. Nihon Dental College Niigata U. Nova Gorica Osaka U. Osaka City U. Panjab U. Peking U. Princeton U. Riken Saga U. USTC BINP Chiba U. U. of Cincinnati Ewha Womans U. Fu-Jen Catholic U. U. of Giessen Gyeongsang Nat’l U. Hanyang U. U. of Hawaii Hiroshima Tech. IHEP, Beijing IHEP, Moscow IHEP, Vienna ITEP Kanagawa U. KEK Korea U. Krakow Inst. of Nucl. Phys. Kyoto U. Kyungpook Nat’l U. EPF Lausanne Jozef Stefan Inst. / U. of Ljubljana / U. of Maribor U. of Melbourne

  26. Belle detector Mt. Tsukuba Ares RF cavity KEKB Belle e+ source ~1 km in diameter The KEKB Collider SCC RF(HER) World record: L = 1.7118 x 1034/cm2/sec First successful op. of Crab cavities ARES(LER) 8 x 3.5 GeV 22 mrad crossing since 1999

  27. Belle Detector ACC (PID) Aerogel Cherenkov Counter n=1.015~1.030 SC Solenoid 1.5T 3.5 GeVe+ ECL CsI(Tl) 16X0 TOF 8 GeVe- CDC Central Drift Chamber small cell +He/C2H6 KLM m/KL detection 14/15 lyr. RPC+Fe SVD Si Vertex Detector 3(4) lyr. DSSD

  28. Dataset on (5S) Main Purpose: Bs Physics e.g. Will be submitted soon. 7

  29. Event Selection for (nS)h+h- h = p, K

  30. Event Selection for (nS)h+h- • Track Prompt: within 5 cm of IP in z (beam direction) 1 cm in transverse • m+m- + h+h-(+ X0 Muon ID; loose h = p, K No other charged tracks with pT > 100 MeV/c2 • |M(m+m-) - M((nS))|< 150 MeV/c2 (3s) (nS) candidate • cos < 0.95 • reject e’sfaking ’s Electron ID • h = K case Kaon ID Main bkg :m+m-  m+m-e+e-that mimic(1S)e+e-(conversions) Remark: Looser than (4S)  (1S) p+p- analysis Crosschecks w/ (4S) and (3S)

  31. e+e- (nS)h+h-at 10.87 GeV 21.7 fb-1 Signal box to optimize on background 3S 2S 1S m+m-g[→e+e-]

  32. New preliminaryResult: 112 fb-1 • Based on new data skim (112 fb-1) w/ 4x efficiency • Now consistent w/ BaBar Revised publication coming soon Corrected (4S)  (1S)p+p- Note improved background shape 477 fb-1 Uncover from this study - Data and signal yield correct - Efficiency estimate for signal normalization was wrong

  33. Results

  34. 3S 4S (4S)  (1S) p+p- 4S 2S 2S 3S 3S 4S Expect to vanish “(5S)” (1S)p+p-, (2S)p+p- (2S)p+p- 3S “(5S)” 2S 1S Striking ! (1S)p+p- “(5S)” >

  35. “(5S)” some other reflection ? 4S 2S 3S Remarks e+e- (1S)p+p- > • Structure at ~ 0.84 GeV/c2 below 3S: “(5S)” → (2S)p+p- ↳(1S) + X0 • “(5S)”: single ECM energy at 10.87 GeV No clear indication of radiative tail

  36. 14s 20s square box gives ~ 3.9s (1S)K+K- 4.9s Kaon ID (3S)p+p- “(5S)” (nS)p+p-, (1S)K+K- 3.2s Signal box to optimize on background (2S)p+p- (1S)p+p-

  37. (2S)p+p- (3S)p+p- (1S)K+K- (1S)p+p- 20s 14s Yield: Unbinned extended ML Fit bkg yield signal yield bkg PDF [linear ⇐ optimize box signal PDF [two Gaussians 3.2s 4.9s

  38. (1S)p+p- (2S)p+p- cosqHel CLEO’07 Efficiency estimate: re-weighted MC according to data M(pp) and cosqHel Distributions phase space Brown-Cahn Model N.B. other two modes use B-C model due to limited statistics

  39. Systematic Uncertainty Source (1S)p+p-(2S)p+p- (3S)p+p- (1S)K+K- Tracking 4.1% 4.6% 5.6% 4.1% Lepton Ident. 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Electron rejection 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% 3.6% Fitting 1.5% 3.7% 1.7% 1.4% pp model 4.4% 6.8% 3.2% 13.6% M(mmpp) selection 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% Bhabha rejection 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% Trigger 0.9% 3.1% 4.5% 1.0% Luminosity 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% Cross-section 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% (nS) →mm bf 2.0% 8.8% 9.6% 2.0% Total 9.0% 14.4% 14.0% 16.1%

  40. Echoes Y(4260) Need Mechanism Need Scan to tell Summary Table Assume “(5S)” = (5S) PDG value taken for (nS) properties N.B. Resonance cross section 0.302 ± 0.015 nb at 10.87 GeV PRD 98, 052001(2007) [Belle] Cf (2S)  (1S)p+p- ~ 6 keV (3S) 0.9 keV (4S)1.8 keV • Is this (5S), or the Yb state? N.B. G(5S)  e+e- ≃ 0.13 keVnormal

  41. Discussion

  42. No Indication ! Certainly “Anomalous” !

  43. 10.75 10.8 10.85 10.9 10.95 11.0 Scan ? ~ 8 fb-1(1 fb-1 pts) PRL 98, 052001 (2007) (10865) could be (5S) - Yb mixture 6/2005 “scan” 5 points, 30 pb-1 each (stat error) fit with G(5S)= 110 MeV Yb!? Compare Hadrons vs (1S)p+p-,(2S)p+p-

  44. More Y’s from BaBar and Belle Y(4320)

  45. Two Y’s ? PRL99, 182004 (2007) Y(4360)=Y(4320) ? Y(4660) ! PRL99, 142002 (2007)

  46. Yb? ’ 10.75 10.8 10.85 10.9 10.95 11.0 Scan could uncover rich structure ! Scan ? ~ 8 fb-1(1 fb-1 pts) PRL 98, 052001 (2007) 6/2005 “scan” 5 points, 30 pb-1 each (stat error) fit with G(5S)= 110 MeV Yb? Compare Hadrons vs (1S)p+p-,(2S)p+p-

  47. A Super B Factory can study in detail.

  48. Summary arXiv:0710.2577 • Observation of“(5S)” (1S)p+p-,(2S)p+p- • Evidence for“(5S)” (3S)p+p-,(1S)K+K- • Assuming (5S) properties, • B((5S) (1S)p+p-) = • B((5S) (2S)p+p-) = • B((5S) (3S)p+p-) = • B((5S) (1S)K+K-) = • w/ partial widths 0.52 – 0.85 MeV⇐ Very Large • New preliminary Bf for (4S)  (1S)p+p- Y(4260)-ish Cf. ~ 0.018 MeV for (4S) (1S)p+p-

  49. Thank you !

More Related