1 / 19

LUCA: Last Universal Common Ancestor

LUCA: Last Universal Common Ancestor. 12 September 2016. LUCA is not an Italian biochemist.

dlapointe
Télécharger la présentation

LUCA: Last Universal Common Ancestor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LUCA: Last Universal Common Ancestor 12 September 2016

  2. LUCA is not an Italian biochemist • This venerable ancestor was a single-cell, bacterium-like organism. But it has a grand name, or at least an acronym. It is known as Luca, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, and is estimated to have lived some four billion years ago, when Earth was a mere 560 million years old.

  3. Root of the tree of life • LUCA created two types of single-celled microorganisms: Archaea on one hand, or cells with no nucleus or organelles — specialized structures in the cell — and bacteria on the other, which have a nucleus. This separation would have occurred about 3.5 billion years ago.

  4. New results reported in Nature 2016 • A recent finding sharpens the debate between those who believe life began in some extreme environment, such as in deep sea vents or the flanks of volcanoes, and others who favor more normal settings, such as the “warm little pond” proposed by Darwin.

  5. Nature of our earliest ancestor • The nature of the earliest ancestor of all living things has long been uncertain because the three great kingdoms of life seemed to have no common point of origin. The kingdoms are those of the bacteria, the archaea and the eukaryotes. Archaea are bacteria-like organisms but with a different metabolism, and the eukaryotes include all plants and animals.

  6. LUCA’s nature • Specialists have recently come to believe that the bacteria and archaea were the two earliest kingdoms, with the eukaryotes emerging later. That opened the way for a group of evolutionary biologists, led by William F. Martin of Heinrich Heine University in Düsseldorf, Germany, to try to discern the nature of the organism from which the bacterial and archaeal kingdoms emerged.

  7. Follow the genes • Their starting point was the known protein-coding genes of bacteria and archaea. Some six million such genes have accumulated over the last 20 years in DNA databanks as scientists with the new decoding machines have deposited gene sequences from thousands of microbes.

  8. Primordial genes? • Genes that do the same thing in a man and a mouse are generally related by common descent from an ancestral gene in the first mammal. So by comparing their sequence of DNA letters, genes can be arranged in evolutionary family trees, a property that enabled Dr. Martin and his colleagues to assign the six million genes to a much smaller number of gene families. Of these, only 355 met their criteria for having probably originated in LUCA, the joint ancestor of bacteria and archaea.

  9. The 355 genes pointed quite precisely to an organism that lived in the conditions found in deep sea vents, the gassy, metal-laden, intensely hot plumes caused by seawater interacting with magma erupting through the ocean floor.

  10. Deep sea vents are surrounded by exotic life-forms and, with their extreme chemistry, have long seemed places where life might have originated. The 355 genes ascribable to LUCA include some that metabolize hydrogen as a source of energy as well as a gene for an enzyme called reverse gyrase, found only in microbes that live at extremely high temperatures

  11. Two alternatives • The fact that LUCA depended on hydrogen and metals favors a deep sea vent environment for the origin of life rather than the land environment posited in a leading rival theory. • Others believe that the LUCA that was already a highly sophisticated organism that had evolved far beyond the origin of life, meaning the formation of living systems from the chemicals present on the early Earth, like created in Miller-Urey experiments

  12. LUCA and the origin of life are “events separated by a vast distance of evolutionary innovation,” said Jack Szostak of Massachusetts General Hospital, who has studied how the first cell membranes might have evolved.

  13. Warm Pond • It is like a beaker in the lab: • Chemicals mix • Reactions occur • Cells are created • Organisms evolve, becoming better adapted • They make some needed compounds, get others from the environment • RNA and DNA develop to assure heredity

  14. Evidence life arose in a warm pond • Miller-Urey experiments show it is easy to make the building blocks of life in the early Earth environment • The first cell membranes could form to encapsulate the reactions of life • It took a long time, and happened long before thermophiles developed their particular enzymes

  15. Hot Vent • In a hydrothermal vent at the bottom of the ocean, energy is from chemical reactions • Photosynthesis could develop later

  16. Evidence life arose in a hot vent • Extremophiles are found near the root of the tree of life • Early life would be protected from asteroid and comet impacts • Genetic analysis shows the genes shared by all organisms are similar to those of existing thermophiles

More Related