SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Valence bond theory

don avatar
24 diapositives · 913 Views · Mar 08, 2014

Valence bond theory. Electrons are not simply dots And bonds are not sticks. Learning objectives. Describe principles of valence bond theory Predict hybridization of orbitals based on Lewis dot structures and electronic geometry Describe difference between sigma and pi bonding.

Valence bond theory - slide 1
01 / 24Valence bond theory
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Valence bond theory
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Valence bond theory Electrons are not simply dots And bonds are not sticks

  2. Learning objectives • Describe principles of valence bond theory • Predict hybridization of orbitals based on Lewis dot structures and electronic geometry • Describe difference between sigma and pi bonding

  3. Taking it to the next level: acknowledging orbitals • VSEPR is quite successful in predicting molecular shapes based on the simplistic Lewis dot approach • But our understanding of the atom has the electrons occupying atomic orbitals • How do we reconcile the observed shapes of molecules with the atomic orbital picture of atoms

  4. Valence bond theory • Valence bond theory is the simplest approach to an orbital picture of covalent bonds • Each covalent bond is formed by an overlap of atomic orbitals from each atom • The individual orbital identity is retained • The bond strength is proportional to the amount of orbital overlap

  5. Overlap of two 1s orbitals in H2

  6. Overlap of two 2p orbitals directed along the bond axis (sigma bond) • Overlap of p and s orbitals

  7. Problems with tetrahedral bonds • In CH4 the bonds are all equivalent and at angles of 109.5° • The 2p orbitals in C are at 90° - far from optimum for overlap • The ground state configuration is 2s22p2 • Reconcile these facts with the known structure

  8. Hybridization • The wave mechanics permits mixing of the atomic orbital set to produce “hybrid” orbitals • Hybridization alters the shape and energy of the original • In the case of C, the differences between the 2s and 2p are smoothed out and a homogeneous collection of four sp3 hybrid orbitals is produced

  9. sp3 hybridization • Formally, one of the 2s electrons is promoted to the empty 2p orbital (an energy cost, which is repaid on bond formation) • The four basis orbitals are then “hybridized” to yield the set of four sp3

  10. Tetrahedral directions and sp3 hybrids

  11. Valence bond picture of CH4 • Each C sp3 hybrid contains one electron • Each H 1s contains one electron

  12. Lone pairs occupy sp3 hybrid orbitals • Valence bond picture of the tetrahedral electronic geometry provides same results for the molecules with lone pairs

  13. Notes on hybridization • The total number of orbitals is unchanged • Four atomic orbitals (s + 3 x p) give four hybrid orbitals (4 x sp3) • The electron capacity remains unchanged • There is one hybridization scheme for each of the five electronic geometries • The same hybridization scheme is always used for a given electronic geometry

  14. sp hybridization for linear geometry • One s and one p orbital

  15. sp2 hybridization for trigonal planar • One s and two p orbitals

  16. Sigma and pi bonding • The hybridized orbitals describe the electronic geometry: bonds along the internuclear axes (sigma bonds) • The “unused” p orbitals overlap in a parallel arrangement above and below the internuclear axis (pi bonds)

  17. Comparison of pi and sigma bonding

  18. Pi bonding accounts for bond multiplicity • Two unused p orbitals in sp hybrid (linear geometry) • Two pi bonds • N≡N triple bond (one sigma, two pi) • One unused p orbital in sp2 hybrid (trigonal planar geometry • One pi bond • C=C double bond (one sigma, one pi)

  19. Valence bond picture of ethylene H2C=CH2 • Sigma bonds between C and H (blue/red) and C and C (blue) • Six electrons around C • Pi bond between C and C (green) • Two electrons around C

  20. Valence bond picture of acetylene HC≡CH • Sigma bonds between C and H (red and blue) and C and C (blue) • 4 electrons around C • Two pi bonds between C and C (green) • 4 electrons around C

  21. Beyond coordination number 4 • Invoke empty d orbitals (impossible for second row elements) • One d orbital for trigonal bipyramidal • Two d orbitals for octahedral • Number of orbitals in hybrid always equals number of charge clouds

  22. Trigonal bipyramid – sp3d

  23. Octahedral –sp3d2

  24. Shortcomings of valence bond • The orbitals still maintain atomic identity • Bonds are limited to two atoms • Cannot accommodate the concept of delocalized electrons – bonds covering more than two atoms • Problems with magnetic and spectroscopic properties