1 / 29

Tutorial: Pulmonary Function--Dr. Bhutani Clinical Case

Tutorial: Pulmonary Function--Dr. Bhutani Clinical Case. 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support @ 18 hours age: Settings: 18 / 5 cm H 2 0 x 45 breaths / min; FiO 2 = 0.65 Driving Pressure: 18-5 = 13 cm H 2 0

donald
Télécharger la présentation

Tutorial: Pulmonary Function--Dr. Bhutani Clinical Case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tutorial: Pulmonary Function--Dr. Bhutani Clinical Case 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support @ 18 hours age: Settings: 18 / 5 cm H20 x 45 breaths / min; FiO2 = 0.65 Driving Pressure: 18-5 = 13cm H20 Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg Is this baby a candidate for permissive hypercapnia?

  2. Normocapnia varies? • Maternal:32 -34 mmHg (progesterone effect) • Fetal: 40 -42 mmHg • At birthing: 45 -65 mmHg • First day : 34 mmHg (progesterone effect) • After first week : 35 -42 mmHg • Term PCA: 35 -42 mmHg (RR = 40-60/min) • 52 wks PCA: 35 -42 mmHg (RR = 20-30/min)

  3. Strategies to Prevent Non-Permissive Hypercapnia • Define optimum PaCO2 levels • Level to at which you will intervene • Level to at which you will wean • Ventilate at optimal FRC • Continuous monitoring of tidal volume • Use least pressure for maximal tidal volume • Facilitate spontaneous breathing • Consider “dual wean” of driving pressures • Consider pseudo-adaptive strategies

  4. Alveolar Algebra: Ventilation • Alveolar Ventilation inversely correlated to PaCO2 • Alveolar Ventilation is (VT-VD) x rate • Provided dead space is constant: proportional changes in VT or rate will lead to proportional changes in alveolar ventilation and PaCO2. Based on Pulmonary Gas Law: in a steady state, when inspired CO2 is negligible, then PACO2 = 863 (VCO2 / VA); where, VCO2 is CO2 production; PACO2 is partial pressure of carbon dioxide; 863 is body temp. x std. pressure / standard temperature ( 310 X 760/273 = 863 )

  5. Clinical Case 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support and is now about 18 hours age and has stable vital signs, normotensive and is normoglycemic: Settings: PIP:18 cm H20; PEEP: 5 cm H20; SIMV: 45 br / min; Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg Is the Alveolar Ventilation compromised? If so, by how much?

  6. Clinical Case 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support and is now about 18 hours age and has stable vital signs, normotensive and is normoglycemic: Settings: PIP:18 cm H20; PEEP: 5 cm H20; SIMV: 45 br / min; Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg PaCO2 = 55 mmHg is 35% higher than 40 mmHg Alveolar Ventilation is decreased by 35%

  7. Clinical Case 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support and is now about 18 hours age and has stable vital signs, normotensive and is normoglycemic: Settings: PIP:18 cm H20; PEEP: 5 cm H20; SIMV: 45 br / min; Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg PaCO2 = 54 mmHg is 35% higher than 40 mmHg Questions: Do we wean? Which option?

  8. Clinical Case • OPTIONS: • No Change • Reduce PIP by I cm H20 (17/5) : • Driving Pressure = 12 cm H20 • 3. Reduce PEEP by I cm H20 (18/4): • Driving Pressure = 14 cm H20 • 4. Reduce SIMV: Decrease minute ventilation

  9. Clinical Case: Use of Tidal Volume 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support: Settings: 18 / 5 cm H20 x 35 breaths / min Driving Pressure: 18-5 = 13cm H20 Tidal Volume (measured): = 4 ml (5.7ml/kg) Effective Compliance: = V /  P ; 5.7 / 13 ml/cm H20/kg Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg

  10. Clinical Case 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support: Settings: 18 / 5 cm H20 x 35 breaths / min Driving Pressure: 18-5 = 13cm H20 Tidal Volume (measured): = 4.0 ml (5.7 ml/kg) Effective Compliance: = V /  P ; 5.7 /13 = 0.44 ml / cm H20/kg Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg

  11. Relationship to FRC

  12. Least Intervention or Barotrauma Ventilate at Optimal FRC • Increase Lung Volume : CPAP • Adequate Lung Inflation : T insp. • Adequate Lung Deflation : T exp. • Adjust T insp. / T exp. : by estimating Time Constants

  13. Clinical Case 695 g male neonate with RDS, treated with surfactant and on ventilatory support: Settings: 18 / 5 cm H20 x 45 breaths / min Driving Pressure: 18-5 = 13cm H20 Tidal Volume (measured): = 4.0 ml (5.7 ml/kg) Effective Compliance: = V /  P ; 5.7 /13 = 0.44 ml / cm H20 Arterial Gas: pH = 7.3; PaO2 = 74; PaCO2 = 55 mmHg

  14. Graphic Representation of Ventilator Settings  V = 5.7ml/kg (PEEP) 5 18 (PIP)  P = 13 cm H20

  15. Graphic Representation of Ventilator Settings  V /  P = 5.7/ 13 = 0.44 ml/cm H20 /kg  V = 5.7ml/kg (PEEP) 5 18 (PIP)  P = 13 cm H20

  16. Linear Change in  V/  P 19 18 17  V /  P = 5.7/ 13 = 0.44 ml/cm H20 TLC  V VOLUME 5 PEEP Peak Inflating Pressure RV  P = Driving pressure PRESSURE (cmH20)

  17. Imaginary P-V relationship 19 18 17 TLC  V VOLUME PEEP 5 Peak Inflating Pressure RV  P = Driving pressure PRESSURE (cmH20)

  18. Clinical Case • OPTIONS: • No Change • Reduce PIP by I cm H20 (17/5) : • Driving Pressure = 12 cm H20 • 3. Reduce PEEP by I cm H20 (18/4): • Driving Pressure = 14 cm H20 • 4. Reduce SIMV: Decrease minute ventilation

  19. Wean Peak Inflating Pressure Peak Inflating Pressure 19 16 TLC Tidal Volume decreases with weaning  V VOLUME 5 18 PEEP 17  P = 12 Driving pressure decreased RV PRESSURE (cmH20)

  20. Clinical Case • OPTIONS: • No Change • Reduce PIP by I cm H20 (17/5) : • Driving Pressure = 12 cm H20 • 3. Reduce PEEP by I cm H20 (18/4): • Driving Pressure = 14 cm H20 • 4. Reduce SIMV: Decrease minute ventilation

  21. Wean PEEP Peak Inflating Pressure 19 17 TLC Tidal Volume increases with weaning  V VOLUME 5 PEEP 4 18  P = 14 Driving pressure increased RV PRESSURE (cmH20)

  22. Circuit Airflow • Airflow that is set, at operator’s discretion, to flow from inspiratory to expiratory circuits. • Magnitude dependent on patient’s minute ventilation • Excessive circuit airflow can lead to turbulence and may impede expiratory flow from the patient • Low flow may limit inspiratory airflow • Optimal circuit flow is about 5 to 8 fold minute ventilation

  23. Clinical Case • OPTIONS: • Dual Wean: Reduce both PIP/PEEP • Dual Wean: 18/5 to 17/4 cm H20 • = Driving Pressure • = 13 cm H20

  24. DUAL WEAN: concurrent wean of both PIP and PEEP Peak Inflating Pressure 19 16 TLC Tidal Volume increases with weaning Tidal Volume increases with weaning  V VOLUME 5 18 PEEP 4 17 Driving pressure unchanged RV  P = 13 PRESSURE (cmH20)

  25. DUAL WEAN that allows for permissive hypercapnia 18 Peak Inflating Pressure TLC 14 Tidal Volume unchanged with weaning  V VOLUME 5 PEEP 4 Driving pressure decreased RV  P = 10 PRESSURE (cmH20)

  26. Clinical Case • PaCO2 = 55 torr at 18/5: • IATROGENIC HYPERCAPNIA secondary to ventilation at “flattened” portion of the P-V relationship • After Dual Wean, PaCO2 will be lowered provided ventilation is occurring closer to total lung capacity. • Subsequent weaning to 14/4 may result in a PaCO2 = 55 torr • PERMISSIVE HYPERCAPNIA

  27. Iatrogenic hypercapnia with inappropriate Dual Wean 19 TLC 16 Tidal Volume decreases with weaning VOLUME  V PEEP 18 5 4 Peak Inflating Pressure RV 17  P PRESSURE (cmH20)

More Related