1. RTI Snapshot: A Model for AnnualAssessment of Your RTI System May 9th, 2012 OrRTI Spring Conference Bend, Oregon

2. Goals for today • Walk through a step by step process for building an assessment of your RTI system that is . . . • Efficient, • Feasible, • Sustainable, • and most importantly, Meaningful. • Examine RTI Snapshot data for North Clackamas for the past two years to identify strengths and areas in need of improvement.

3. Who we are . . . • District Enrollment in 2011-12: 17,260 • 11% English Learners • 14% Special Education • 44% Free & Reduced Price Lunch • Student Diversity • White/Euroamerica 14,815 • Hispanic/Latino/Spanish 2,736 • Asian 1,573 • Russian/Ukrainian/Slavic 1,128 • American Indian/Alaska Native 1,007 • Black/African American 680 • Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 262

4. Who we are . . . • 18 elementary schools implementing RTI in Reading • 9 School-wide Title Schools • 3 Targeted Assisted Title Schools • 6 Non-title schools

5. Began assessing the health of our RTI system Began Tier II and Tier III interventions Where we’ve been . . . Began using DIBELS Began discussing RTI Began using RTI for LD eligibility Began implementing Treasures Revisited expectations for Core instruction and LD evaluations

6. How our teams in the district connect . . . Curriculum & Instruction Effective Behavioral and Instructional Supports Systems Team (EBISS) K-12 Literacy Plan Team RTI Leadership Team

7. RTI Leadership Team • Meets 2-5 times each school year • Membership rotates • Includes: • District Administrators for Gen ED, SPED, and ELD • Principals • Classroom teachers • Learning Specialist • Counselor • Instructional Coach/SPED TOSAs • RTI Coordinator

8. RTI Leadership Team Goal for 2010-11 • Develop a way to assess the health of our RTI system in each school that is easy to implement, sustainable, and useful.

9. Step 1: Build a framework

13. Step 2: Research & Brainstorm

17. Step 3: Pilot

18. Spring 2011 Pilot • The DIET-SB was embedded into the annual Title I evaluations for the 9 school-wide Title schools • 4 Title and 4 Non-title schools completed the RTI snapshot

19. Implementing the DIET-SB • Representative school team met with a facilitator • Everyone had a set of cards numbered 0 to 3 • Facilitator read item choices out loud and provided clarifications as needed • Each team member held up a card and the principal recorded the most common response and his/her own response • Team discussed that item for 2-3 minutes • At the end, team took 5-10 minutes to identify area(s) of strength and area(s) in need of improvement.

21. Implementing the RTI Snapshot • Audit occurred in early April (Used tax day as our deadline.) • Coach worked with principal, learning specialist, and ELD specialist to complete the Snapshot • Snapshot emailed to Student Support Services secretary who created charts to represent the data • Charts were reviewed with teams at Title I School Evaluation meetings

24. Step 4: Scale up & make it sustainable

25. Annual Assessment for 2011-12 • Embedded into annual School-wide Title I evaluations AND . . . • Offered to non-title and Targeted Assisted Title schools through half-day RTI work-sessions funded through an OrRTI mini-grant.

26. Step 5: Make it matter!

27. Help teams develop action plans Get feedback Check in on progress From problem to solution . . .

28. Sample School Action Plan, Goal 1

29. Sample School Action Plan, Goal 2

30. NCSDRTI Annual Assessment Results 2010-2012

37. Questions, comments, ideas, suggestions? Kelly Tuomikoski tuomikoskik@nclack.k12.or.us Our RTI Website: http://www.nclack.k12.or.us//Domain/249 For help navigating our website: Gail Meyer meyerg@nclack.k12.or.us