220 likes | 346 Vues
Bowling Green State University aims to be a leading learning community, fostering individual growth and shaping future leaders through discovery and collaboration. Our strategic focus on investing in faculty, academic programs, and technology is essential for increasing student success and enhancing our academic profile. We address budgetary policies, efficiently reallocating resources to improve quality and sustain financial health. Through careful analysis of trends and peer comparisons, we are committed to recruiting and retaining students, optimizing administrative infrastructure, and advancing higher enrollment rates.
E N D
Vision Bowling Green State University aspires to be a premier learning community, and a national model, for developing individuals and shaping the future through learning, discovery, collaboration and personal growth
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
NSICP TrendsFTE Student per TT Faculty/FTE Student per NTT Faculty
NSCIP Peer Comparisons* * Based upon Fall 2009 data
General Observations We are good………. But is good, good enough?
Vision Bowling Green State University aspires to be a premier learning community, and a national model, for developing individuals and shaping the future through learning, discovery, collaboration and personal growth
Focus Invest strategically in Faculty + Invest strategically in Academic Programs + Invest strategically in Facilities and Technology + = High Quality Academic Programs and Enhanced Student Success
Budgetary Policy Changes from Prior Year • Open faculty lines return centrally • strategic reallocation between Colleges • held central for subsequent focused investment • Plans are required for optimal use of Colleges/Units Reserves • Using data to inform budgetary decisions • Peer, Productivity, Enrollment Trends, Outcomes
Necessary……. • Protect core academic foundation (i.e., Accreditation, etc.) • Ensure financial sustainability • Adequate and appropriate facilities …………But not sufficient to improve quality
Budget Priorities Quality • Strategically invest in faculty • Academic programming • Recruit and Retain Students Efficiency and Effectiveness • Administrative Infrastructure
Budget Priorities: Quality Strategically Invest in Faculty • Overall, increase the percent of TT Faculty • Balance productivity of faculty • Where appropriate, enhance operating budgets • Development funds to support teaching/research
Budget Priorities: Quality • Academic programming • Refocus current programming • General Education Renewal • Support “high impact” programming (retention, quality, and/or recruitment) • Reallocate resources from “limited impact” programming or low demand programs • Create new academic programming that: • Supports the enhancement of the academic profile of traditional student body • And/or increases overall enrollment
Budget Priorities: Quality • Recruit and Retain Students • Enhance academic profile of traditional students • Increase overall enrollment of new students • International (UG and Grad) • Distance Learning (UG and Grad) • Transfer (2+2, etc.) • Increase retention and 6 year graduation rate • Advising, Long-term Goal: 22,500 to 25,000 HC enrollment
Budget Priorities: Efficiencies and Effectiveness • Administrative Infrastructure • Rethink - Quality • Realign - Focus • Reduce – reallocation of resources • For Example, • Centralize vs. Decentralize • Advising, International programs, Learning communities, Faculty development, Support services • Missing Infrastructure • Assessment, Research support, Decision Support, Curriculum Management
Budget Priorities Quality • Strategically invest in faculty • Academic programming • Recruit and Retain Students Efficiency and Effectiveness • Administrative Infrastructure
Establishing the financial foundation for the future • Grow quality of academic programming • Increase profile and number of UG and Graduate students • Increase external research funding