1 / 13

Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda

Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda  BERINA UWIMBABAZI. Structure of presentation What is Biodiversity Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment Constraints and Challenges.

Télécharger la présentation

Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda  BERINA UWIMBABAZI

  2. Structure of presentation • What is Biodiversity • Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda • Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment • Constraints and Challenges

  3. What is Biodiversity? “Means the variability among living organisms from all sources, including, inter alia, terrestrial ecosystems and aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they, are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems”; (National Environment Act, 1995)

  4. Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda • Surveys report the occurrence of over 18,783 species that are known or have been recorded in Uganda; • Uganda harbours seven of Africa’s 18 plant kingdoms – more than any other African country; • Biodiversity conservation in Uganda is currently being managed mainly through Protected Area System in form of Forest Reserves, National Parks, Wildlife Reserves and Animal Sanctuaries. A network of protected areas in key biodiversity habitats has been put in place and this provided a basis for sound conservation and management; • Other Fragile Ecosystems protected by Law include Aquatic resources, Wetlands and Montane Ecosystems; • Management of Uganda’s biodiversity is largely a responsibility of Government, as a result Government has put in place relevant policies and legislative measures to support conservation and the sustainable use of biodiversity;

  5. Cont’d • These include National Policies on environment, wildlife, fisheries and wetlands as well as National Acts on environment, wildlife, land, water and decentralisation; • During budget allocation and national planning, some budgetary items reflect biodiversity conservation requirements; • Institutions like Uganda Wildlife Authority, National Environment Management Authority, National Forest Authority, National Agricultural Research Organization, the Wetlands Inspectorate Division etc. concerned with bio-diversity have been established; • Management structures conducive to biodiversity conservation have been put in place, such as Decentralization of power to Local Governments, this for example led to the decentralization of management of natural resources

  6. Con’td • The National Forest Action Plan and National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy been prepared; • Awareness is being raised in local communities on the importance of biodiversity conservation

  7. Integration of Biodiversity Conservation in the Ugandan EIA System • The National Environment Act makes it mandatory for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) to be undertaken prior to the implementation of any project likely to have adverse effects on the environment; • In the National Environment Act, Environment is defines as “the physical factors of the surroundings of the human beings, including land, water, atmosphere, climate sound, odor, taste, the biological factors of animals and plants and the social factor of aesthetics and includes both the natural and the built environment”. Going by this definition, environment in this sense covers all levels of biodiversity; • The Ugandan EIA system therefore recognizes EIA to include all the three dimensions of the environment namely; ecological, social and economic. In other words, all EIAs are expected to be carried out in a manner that embraces these aspects of the environment. It is for this reason that the practice so far has been not to separate Environmental Impact Assessment from biodiversity conservation;

  8. Cont’d • The National Environment Act, also lists the types of Projects that should undertake mandatory EIA studies examples include; • Natural Conservation Areas • Agricultural Projects • Forest related activities • Dams, Rivers and Water Resources • Aerial Spraying • Transportation

  9. Basic steps in the Ugandan EIA Process • Step I: The developer submits a project brief to NEMA • Step II: Based on the contents of the Project Brief, the Authority (NEMA), in consultation with an appropriate lead agency(ies), carries out screening • Step III: The developer is informed of the findings and decision whether further assessment is necessary or not • Step IV: If the Project Brief is not adequate, a full Environmental Impact Study will be required

  10. Con’td • Step V: The Environmental Impact Study is then carried out based on approved TORs (Scoping) • Step VI: After the assessment, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is submitted to NEMA for review • Step VII: Based on the review of the EIS, a final decision is then taken on the environmental aspects of the project

  11. Integration of biodiversity conservation in EIA faces challenges in Uganda due to: • unclear institutional mandate • lack of coordination between institutions • limited capacity and experience in the area • ineffective conservation networks • inadequate stakeholder consultations • Lack of a national land use policy • Lack of a national food policy • Ineffective Post EIA Monitoring and implementation of mitigation measures

  12. Cont’d • Developers still do not recognise the value of EIA as a planning tool • Inadequate awareness of biodiversity issues • Use and application of EIA after Project development has commenced • Lack of data to guide policy-makers and managers of biodiversity • Inadequate community participation in biodiversity- related decision making processes

  13. End Thank You

More Related