1 / 29

Hard probes capabilities of ALICE: Jets and Direct Photons

Hard probes capabilities of ALICE: Jets and Direct Photons. Andreas Morsch CERN, Geneva. Hard Probes 2006, Asilomar, June 9-15, 2006. Outline. Jet Physics Jets at LHC: New perspectives and challenges High- p T di-hadron correlations Reconstructed Jets g -Jet Correlations Summary. ^.

elaine-blair
Télécharger la présentation

Hard probes capabilities of ALICE: Jets and Direct Photons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hard probes capabilities of ALICE:Jets and Direct Photons Andreas Morsch CERN, Geneva Hard Probes 2006, Asilomar, June 9-15, 2006

  2. Outline • Jet Physics • Jets at LHC: New perspectives and challenges • High-pT di-hadron correlations • Reconstructed Jets • g-Jet Correlations • Summary

  3. ^ Nuclear mod. Factor RAA vs <q> A. Dainese, C. Loizides, G. Paic s = 5500 GeV Hump-backed plateau from toy model x = ln(Ejet/phadron) Jet physics at LHC • As for RHIC energies, RAA at LHC will only give lower limit on transport parameter. • Reason: Surface and trigger bias • We can reduce the trigger and surface bias by studying reconstructed jets and increase sensitivity to medium parameters. • Using reconstructed jets we can study directly • Modification of the leading hadron • Additional hadrons from gluon radiation • Transverse heating.

  4. Jet physics at LHC: New perspectives #Jets ET>ETmin • At LHC rates are high at energies at which jets can be reconstructed over the large background from the underlying event. • Reach to about 200 GeV • Provides lever arm to measure the energy dependence of the medium induced energy loss • 104 jets needed to study fragmentation function in the z > 0.8 region. • To make use of the high rate we need trigger ! Pb-Pb 1 month of running |h| < 0.5 More than 1 jet > 20 GeV per central collision

  5. Jet physics at LHC: New challenges • The high production rates also represent a challenge • More than one particle pT > 7 GeV per event • 1.5 TeV background energy in cone of R = Dh2+Df2 < 1 ! • Challenge for jet reconstruction algorithms ! • We want to measure modification of leading hadron and the hadrons from the radiated energy. Small S/B where the effect of the radiated energy should be visible: • Low z • Low jT • Large distance from the jet axis • Low S/B in this region is a challenge !

  6. central Pb–Pb pp New challenges: Apparatus • Also preparing ALICE for jet physics represents a challenge. • Existing: Tracking system • Momentum resolution < 6% up to pT = 100 GeV • For jet structure analysis • Tracking down to 100 MeV • Excellent Particle ID • New: For improved energy resolution and trigger: EMCAL • Pb-scintillator • Energy resolution ~15%/√E DpT/pT

  7. Azimuthal correlation baseline PYTHIA 6.2 Di-hadron correlations:from RHIC to LHC • Di-hadron correlations will be studied at LHC in an energy region where full jet reconstruction is not possible (E < 30 GeV). • What will be different at LHC ? • Number of hadrons/event large • Decreases S/B at LHC but increases also overall statistics • The width of the away-side peak increases to higher order processes • Wider h-correlation (loss of acceptance for fixed h-widow) due to smaller xB • Power-law behavior of x-section (ds/dpT ~ 1/pTn) changes from n = 8 at RHIC and n = 4 at LHC • Changes the trigger bias on parton energy See also, K. Filimonov, J.Phys.G31:S513-S520 (2005)

  8. RHIC/STAR-like central Au-Au (1.8 107 events) LHC/ALICE central Pb-Pb (107 events), no-quenching Scaling from RHIC to LHC From STAR pTtrig = 8 GeV/c pTtrig > 8 GeV • S/B and significance for away-side correlations can be estimated by scaling rates between RHIC and LHC • Ratio of inclusive hadron cross-section • Replace N(pT) ~1/pT8 by ~1/pT4 50 1/25

  9. Di-hadron correlations with ALICE STAR LHC, ALICE acceptance HIJING Simulation 4 105 events M. Ploskon, ALICE INT-2005-49 O(1)/2p “Peak Inversion”

  10. Under study • For pT < 7 GeV many particles per event • Look for other possibilities to quantify jet-like correlations • Example: Averaged Power-spectra (auto-correlations)

  11. pTtrig > 8 GeV hep-ph/0606098 The biased trigger bias <pTpart> is a function of pTtrig but also pTassoc, s, near-side/away-side, DE See also, K. Filimonov, J.Phys.G31:S513-S520,2005

  12. From di-hadron correlations to jets • Strong bias on fragmentation function • … which we want to measure • Very low efficiency, example: • 1.1 106 Jets produced in central Pb-Pb collisions (|h| < 0.5) • ~1500 Jets selected using leading particles pT > 60 GeV

  13. Reduction of the trigger biasby collecting more energy from jet fragmentation… Unbiased parton energy fraction - production spectrum induced bias

  14. Jets reconstructed from charged particles: Energy contained in sub-cone R Need reduced cone sizes and transverse momentum cut ! How to reconstruct jets in HI environment:Optimal cone size 1.5 TeV in cone of R = 1 Background: E ~ R2 85% of jet energy Jets can be reconstructed using reduced cone size, but what is the energy resolution ?

  15. What determines the energy resolution ? • There exist different kind of energy fluctuations that contribute to the intrinsic energy resolution in HIC • Fluctuations caused by event-by-event variations of the impact parameter for a given centrality class. • Strong correlation between different regions in h-f plane • ~R2 • Can be eliminated using impact parameter dependent background subtraction • Poissonian fluctuations of uncorrelated particles • DE = N[<pT>2 +DpT2] • ~R • Correlated particles from common source (low-ET jets) • ~R • Out-of-cone Fluctuations Ejet = 100 GeV Resolution limited by out-of-cone fluctuations common to all experiments ! pT > 0 GeV 1 GeV 2 GeV

  16. Reconstructed energy for monochromatic jets Tail towards higher energies = Trigger bias ET = 100 GeV DE/E ~ 50% DE/E ~ 30%

  17. Expected resolution including EMCAL Jet reconstruction using charged particles measured by TPC + ITS and neutral energy from EMCAL. Sarah Blyth, QM2004

  18. Trigger performance Background rejection set to factor of 10 =>HLT Centrality dependent thresholds on patch energy A. Mischke and P. Jacobs, ALICE INT-2005-50

  19. ALICE performance studiesWhat has been achieved so far ? • Full detector simulation and reconstruction of HIJING events with embedded Pythia Jets • Implementation of a core analysis frame work • Reconstruction and analysis of charged jets.

  20. Energy spectrum from charged jets Cone-Algorithm: R = 0.4, pT > 2 GeV Selection efficiency ~30% as compared to 6% with leading particle ! No deconvolution, but GaussE-n ~ E-n

  21. Jet structure observables Bump from background Background subtraction under study.

  22. Hump-back plateau Erec > 100 GeV Bias due to incomplete reconstruction. Statistical error 104 events 2 GeV High z (low x): Needs improved resolution (EMCAL). Low z (high x): Systematic error is a challenge, needs reliable tracking. Also good statistics (trigger is needed)

  23. jT Q jT-Spectra Statistical error 104 events Background small where transverse heating is expected.

  24. Q tform = 1/(QkT) tsep = 1/Q More to come … • Dijet correlations • “Sub-jet” Suppression ? • Look for “hot spots” at large distance to jet axis • Small formation time • Can we observe ~10 GeV parton suppression within 100 GeV jets ? R0 = 1fm Q

  25. Dominant processes: g + q → γ+ q (Compton) q + q → γ + g (Annihilation) pT > 10 GeV/c max min EMCal TPC g g IP PHOS Photon-tagged jets g-jet correlation • Eg = Ejet • Opposite direction • Direct photons are not perturbed by the medium • No surface bias • Parton in-medium-modification through the fragmentation function D(z), z = phadron/Eg

  26. Prompt g are likely to be produced isolated Two parameters define g isolation: Cone size R pT threshold candidate isolated if: no particle in cone with pT > pTthres pT sum in cone, SpT < SpTthres R PHOS • pp collisions R = 0.2, pTthres = 0.7 GeV/c • Identification Probability100 % • Misidentification4.5 % • Signal/Background 13 • Pb-Pb collisions R = 0.2, pTthres = 2 GeV/c • Identification Probability 50 % • Misidentification 7 % • Signal/Background 4.2 Promp photon identification:Isolation cut method G. Conesa, ALICE-INT-2005-014, HCP 2005 proceedings

  27. signal x5 Identifying prompt g in ALICE Prompt g reach ~ 100 GeV Statistics for on months of running: 2000 g with Eg > 20 GeV Eg reach increases to 40 GeV with EMCAL

  28. Background non-quenched HIC background Signal quenched jet Fragmentation function Pb-Pb collisions Sensitivity ~ 5% for z < 0.4

  29. Summary • Copious production of jets in PbPb collisions at the LHC • < 20 GeV many overlapping jets/event • Di-hadron correlations • Background conditions require jet identification and reconstruction in reduced cone R < 0.3-0.5 • ALICE will measure jet structure observables (jT, fragmentation function, jet-shape) for reconstructed jets. • High-pT capabilities (calorimetry) needed to reconstruct parton energy • Good low-pT capabilities are needed to measure particles from medium induced radiation. • In this sense ALICE is now optimized for jet studies in HIC • ALICE can measure photon tagged jets with • Eg > 20 GeV (PHOS + TPC) • Eg > 40 GeV (EMCAL+TPC) • Sensitivity to medium modifications ~5%

More Related