1 / 1

Facilitating a Universal Design for Learning Faculty Learning Community Nigel Davies & Leslie Cook

Facilitating a Universal Design for Learning Faculty Learning Community Nigel Davies & Leslie Cook. Administrating FACULTY LEARNING COMMUNITY - DESIGN Topic : Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Based around CAST framework Design : Three Phase Commitment:

elam
Télécharger la présentation

Facilitating a Universal Design for Learning Faculty Learning Community Nigel Davies & Leslie Cook

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Facilitating a Universal Design for Learning Faculty Learning Community Nigel Davies & Leslie Cook • Administrating • FACULTY LEARNING COMMUNITY - DESIGN • Topic: • Universal Design for Learning (UDL) • Based around CAST framework • Design: • Three Phase Commitment: • Phase 1 – Learn and Course (re)Design • Learning about & exploring & researching UDL • Attending Lilly Conference • FLC meetings, forums & projects • Attending course (re)design retreat • Course (re)design with external evaluations • Phase 2 – Research Design - pedagogical action research (Norton & Owens, 2013) • Designing assessment instruments (rubrics) • Course (re)Design implementation & peer observations (3) • Data collection • Phase 3 – Research Sharing (SoTL) • Data analysis & summary • Presentations &/or publications • Member Recruitment: • Application • Sequentially offered to faculty of varying experience • 0-3 years; pre-tenure; all faculty • Identify course(s) • Departmental Chair approval/recommendation • Completion: • Stipend payments • Recognition (yet to occur) • Successes: • Recruited 6 dedicated faculty that really wanted to learn • Completion of the 3 phases (met deadlines) • Support to enable ALL to present SoTL findings • Challenges: • Recruitment & commitment to FLC • Scheduling meetings • Data collection • Participating • FACULTY LEARNING COMMUNITY - LEARNING • Role: • Perceivedby other FLC members as: • Having greater expertise in UDL • Authority • Personally perceived as: • Multi-function • Administrator • Facilitator • Participant • Role(s) Impact: • Slowed initial progress • Gained momentum as we developed as a team • Point person for all ideas • Successes: • Learned a great about: • FLCs • Group dynamics (across disciplines • Course design • UDL (conceptually & practically) • Strong bond between group members • Group wants to continue to learn & research • Changed as instructors • Also, what & how we reflect • Challenges: • Much to learn about UDL • Frustrations with topic/concept (UDL) • Data collection & analysis challenges • Cautious observation ratings & comments • Maintaining group momentum • Offering direction • Facilitating • FACULTY LEARNING COMMUNITY - FUNCTION • Activities: • Administrative (contracts, commitment/expectations, etc.) • Advocacy for faculty & financial support for activities • Meetings • Meeting stated contractual deadlines • Conference attendance • Maintenance of FLC: • Website • Blogs & forums • Shared files • Investigating UDL • Course design • Rubric development & consensus • Data collection (video, rubrics, student feedback, student ratings of instruction) • Cheerleader • Homework activities • Data analysis & summaries • SoTL • Successes: • All completed teaching & data collection • SIX peer-reviewed presentations accepted, so far • Working on publication submissions • Honest & open discussions • Challenges: • Limited understanding of UDL implementation best practices • Usefulness of rubrics we developed • Technology limitations • Turn around of observation feedback • Departmental recognition/value • UDL • Multiple means of: • Representation • Action & Expression • Engagement

More Related